why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Hey, why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? It IS fetchable, e.g. here: http://www.kde-apps.org/CONTENT/content-files/30375-akode-2.0.2.tar.bz2 Or here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/akode/30375-akode-2.0.2.tar.bz2/659ced0c9c735cb3e55b9138ff02342c/30375-akode-2.0.2.tar

Re: why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Frank J. Laszlo
On 7/10/2011 6:32 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: Hey, why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? Hello, See ports/155297. (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155297) Regards, Frank Laszlo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Chris Rees
On 10 Jul 2011 13:21, "Frank J. Laszlo" wrote: > > On 7/10/2011 6:32 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> >> why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? >> > > Hello, > > See ports/155297. (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155297) > > Regards, > > Frank Laszlo > > Is there

Re: why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Hans Ottevanger
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Hey, > > > why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? > > > It IS fetchable, e.g. here: > > > http://www.kde-apps.org/CONTENT/content-files/30375-akode-2.0.2.tar.bz2 > > > Or here: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/r

Re: why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 10 Jul 2011 13:21, "Frank J. Laszlo" wrote: >> >> On 7/10/2011 6:32 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> >>> why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? >>> >> >> Hello, >> >> See ports/155297. (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/qu

Re: why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable?

2011-07-10 Thread Chris Rees
On 10 Jul 2011 15:34, "Scot Hetzel" wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 10 Jul 2011 13:21, "Frank J. Laszlo" wrote: > >> > >> On 7/10/2011 6:32 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > >>> > >>> Hey, > >>> > >>> > >>> why is audio/akode marked as BROKEN: Unfetchable? > >>> >

Re: ports/156029: [UPDATE] dns/py-dns: update to 2.3.5

2011-07-10 Thread Chris Rees
On 10 Jul 2011 07:37, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" wrote: > > 10.07.2011 03:52, lini...@freebsd.org пишет: >> >> Synopsis: [UPDATE] dns/py-dns: update to 2.3.5 >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> State-Changed-By: linimon >> State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 9 23:51:15 UTC 2011 >> State-Changed-Why: >

Re: ports/156029: [UPDATE] dns/py-dns: update to 2.3.5

2011-07-10 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
10.07.2011 19:56, Chris Rees пишет: On 10 Jul 2011 07:37, "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov" wrote: 10.07.2011 03:52, lini...@freebsd.org пишет: Synopsis: [UPDATE] dns/py-dns: update to 2.3.5 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 9 23:51:15 UTC 2011 St

INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-07-10 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: hs-wai-0.4.0: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-wai-0.4.0: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-hoogle-4.2.5: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-hoogle-4.2.5: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-warp-

INDEX-8 not updated?

2011-07-10 Thread Barbara
It seems that after the commit of math/hs-Agda + math/hs-Agda-executable + www/hs-wai + www/hs-warp, INDEX-8 doesn't get updated. The last one updated is sysutils/fusefs-ntfs $ cd /usr/ports $ grep PORTVERSION www/hs-wai/Makefile PORTVERSION=0.4.0 $ grep ^hs-wai INDEX-8 | cut -d "|" -f 1 hs

Re: INDEX-8 not updated?

2011-07-10 Thread Chris Rees
On 10 July 2011 22:29, Barbara wrote: > > It seems that after the commit of math/hs-Agda + math/hs-Agda-executable + > www/hs-wai + www/hs-warp, INDEX-8 doesn't get updated. > The last one updated is sysutils/fusefs-ntfs > > $ cd /usr/ports > $ grep PORTVERSION www/hs-wai/Makefile > PORTVERSION=  

INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-07-10 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. make_index: hs-wai-0.4.0: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-wai-0.4.0: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-hoogle-4.2.5: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-hoogle-4.2.5: no entry for /usr/ports make_index: hs-warp-

Re: INDEX-8 not updated?

2011-07-10 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Barbara writes: > It seems that after the commit of math/hs-Agda + math/hs-Agda-executable + > www/hs-wai + www/hs-warp, INDEX-8 doesn't get updated. > The last one updated is sysutils/fusefs-ntfs > $ cd /usr/ports > $ grep PORTVERSION www/hs-wai/Makefile > PORTVERSION= 0.4.0 > $ grep ^hs-wai

Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x

2011-07-10 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Erwin Lansing writes: > INDEX build failed with errors: > Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. > make_index: hs-wai-0.4.0: no entry for /usr/ports > make_index: hs-wai-0.4.0: no entry for /usr/ports > make_index: hs-hoogle-4.2.5: no entry for /usr/ports > make_index: hs-hoogle-4.2.5: no entry f

Re: cvs commit: ports/accessibility/kdeaccessibility Makefile ports/arabic/kde3-i18n Makefile ports/arabic/koffice-i18n Makefile ports/audio/arts Makefile ports/audio/juk Makefile ports/audio/mpeglib_

2011-07-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Jul-07 23:13:08 +0400, Max Brazhnikov wrote: >Until ports are not broken or/and forbidden I see no reason for deprecation >and removing them. >However you may consider this step as a recommendation to migrate from >Qt3/KDE3 ports to anything else. I would suggest that deprecation (witho

INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x

2011-07-10 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: cvs commit: ports/accessibility/kdeaccessibility Makefile ports/arabic/kde3-i18n Makefile ports/arabic/koffice-i18n Makefile ports/audio/arts Makefile ports/audio/juk Makefile ports/audio/mpeglib_

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:51:02AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > It would be useful if there was a mechanism to warn users > that the port they are about to install (or have installed) is no > longer recommended. IMHO using DEPRECATED without EXPIRATION_DATE is just fine for this. mcl