security/libprelude fails during portupgrade

2011-06-06 Thread dave shar
Hi, Hope you are well. During portupgrade of libprelude-0.9.24.1 the build fails with this log - portupgrade libprelude-0.9.24.1 ---> Upgrading 'libprelude-0.9.24.1' to 'libprelude-0.9.24.1_1' (security/libprelude) ---> Building '/usr/ports/security/libprelude' ===> Cleaning for libprelude-0.9

Re: security/libprelude fails during portupgrade

2011-06-06 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:18:31 +0800 dave shar articulated: {snip} > configure: error: "libgnutls development headers are required to build > libprelude" > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to po...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and > attach the > "/usr/ports/se

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2011-06-06 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

libgnutls development headers are required to build libprelude

2011-06-06 Thread Колигойда Алексей
Good afternoon. Today, when you upgrade the system find problems configure: error: "libgnutls development headers are required to build libprelude" ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to po...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/security/libprelud

portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

2011-06-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
# pkg_version -vXs openlda openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port # portmaster gconf ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.0_2 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/gconf2 ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for

Re: libgnutls development headers are required to build libprelude

2011-06-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:01:01AM +0300, ? ??? wrote: > Good afternoon. > Today, when you upgrade the system find problems > configure: error: "libgnutls development headers are required to build > libprelude" > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem

make failed for devel/gvfs

2011-06-06 Thread Leslie Jensen
Following the instruction in /usr/ports/UPDATING I do portmaster -r gnutls But it fails with the message below (gvfs) Any suggestions? Thanks /Leslie gmake[4]: Går till katalogen "/usr/ports/devel/gvfs/work/gvfs-1.6.6/daemon" CC gvfsda

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

2011-06-06 Thread Chris Rees
On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > # portmaster gconf > > ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.0_2 > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/gconf2 > > ===>>> Gathering dist

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

2011-06-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > > > # portmaster gconf > > > > ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

2011-06-06 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > > > # portmaster gconf > > > > ===>>> Currently installed version: gconf2-2.32.

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

2011-06-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:15:29PM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:07:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 6 Jun 2011 12:41, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > > > > > > > > > # pkg_version -vXs openlda > > > openldap-sasl-client-2.4.25_2 = up-to-date with port > > > > >

Dropping maintainership for www/php5-redis

2011-06-06 Thread Benedikt Niessen
Hi, I am not using redis anymore and don't have the time to maintain this port in the future. Others have provided the last updates since my initial release. If anybody wants to take over, you are welcome. Thanks and regards, Benedikt ___ freebsd-por

Re: portmaster - updating devel/gconf2 triggers install of net/openldap24-sasl-client, even though it's installed and up to date

2011-06-06 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> > Did you set any OPTIONS on openldap when you first installed it? >> >> I bet the SASL option is set and net/openldap24-client (origin) is >> installed. > > yes and yes > >> We should just kill the openldap2{3,4}-sasl-{client,server} >>

Re: make failed for devel/gvfs

2011-06-06 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
06.06.2011 15:58, Leslie Jensen пишет: Following the instruction in /usr/ports/UPDATING I do portmaster -r gnutls But it fails with the message below (gvfs) Any suggestions? Thanks /Leslie Fix was commited recently. Try to update your ports, then rebuild gnutls, then rebuild gvfs. gm

Re: 8.2-RC1 tightvnc-1.3.10 installs 0 byte files, deinstall fails

2011-06-06 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
05.06.2011 22:54, efbatey пишет: Is tightvnc (1 3 10) the most or only viable VNC Server for FreeBsd 8.2? Fails to install because Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp in a web browser and follow the "Download" link for "JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1_3_18

Re: Dropping maintainership for www/php5-redis

2011-06-06 Thread Mikhail Tsatsenko
On 06.06.2011 16:52, Benedikt Niessen wrote: Hi, I am not using redis anymore and don't have the time to maintain this port in the future. Others have provided the last updates since my initial release. If anybody wants to take over, you are welcome. Hi, I'll be glad to maintain this port.

Re: 8.2-RC1 tightvnc-1.3.10 installs 0 byte files, deinstall fails

2011-06-06 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
I use the vnc port (net/vnc) it is faster, and works very good with inetd/Xvnc. thightvnc lacks features in Xvnc. and it is slower than the realvnc too ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

archivers/unzip vs tar -xf

2011-06-06 Thread Eir Nym
Since FreeBSD 5.4.0-Release libarchive(3) support to unpack zip files. Why not to use it to unpack distributives to workdir? I've downloaded all distros and tried to unpack them all with tar(1) with no problems. I use FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r222717. -- Yours, Eir Nym __

Re: archivers/unzip vs tar -xf

2011-06-06 Thread Xin LI
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Eir Nym wrote: > Since FreeBSD 5.4.0-Release libarchive(3) support to unpack zip files. > Why not to use it to unpack distributives to workdir? > > I've downloaded all distros and tried to unpack them all with tar(1) > with no problems. I use FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r2

Re: archivers/unzip vs tar -xf

2011-06-06 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:50:36AM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Eir Nym wrote: > > Since FreeBSD 5.4.0-Release libarchive(3) support to unpack zip files. > > Why not to use it to unpack distributives to workdir? > > > > I've downloaded all distros and tried to unpack the

Re: archivers/unzip vs tar -xf

2011-06-06 Thread Alex Kozlov
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:50:36AM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Eir Nym wrote: >> Since FreeBSD 5.4.0-Release libarchive(3) support to unpack zip files. >> Why not to use it to unpack distributives to workdir? >> >> I've downloaded all distros and tried to unpack them al

Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "moz" module on amd64 8-STABLE

2011-06-06 Thread Don Lewis
On 8 May, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for your report. I'm aware of this issue, since my OOo build > is broken at the same place. Sorry and I don't have a clue yet, but, > I guess from folllowing error message, somehow moz module > invoke make instead gmake. >> Makefile:83: *** missing sep

Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "moz" module on amd64 8-STABLE

2011-06-06 Thread Maho NAKATA
Hi Don, Great. I'll apply as soon as possible. thanks, Nakata Maho From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: OO 3.3.0 fails to build "moz" module on amd64 8-STABLE Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:30:04 -0700 (PDT) > On 8 May, Maho NAKATA wrote: >> Hi >> >> Thanks for your report. I'm aware of this issue, since