libcii upgrade

2011-03-31 Thread Franco Marchesini
Hello, can you upgrade the libcii port to version 2? Thank in advance for your work Franco http://code.google.com/p/cii/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail t

Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:34:53 +0200 (CEST) Barbara articulated: > >On Wednesday 30 March 2011 07:03 pm, Barbara wrote: > >> I'm referring to this commit: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=422486+0+current/cvs-po > >>rts > >> > >> After updating nspluginwrapper-devel, firefox instead

Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Robert Huff
Jerry writes: > > I run "nspluginwrapper -a -v -i" in that directory, as I always did > > after upgrading that port. > > I think that you are talking about that, aren't you? > > When I try and run that command, I receive this error message: > > $ nspluginwrapper -a -v -i > Auto-install p

Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:21:45 -0400 Robert Huff articulated: > > Jerry writes: > > > I run "nspluginwrapper -a -v -i" in that directory, as I always > > > did after upgrading that port. > > > I think that you are talking about that, aren't you? > > > > When I try and run that command, I rec

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-31 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 29/03/2011 23:29 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > ok let's try to say it simpler :) the main goal is to keep it simple > for now, simple and rock solid, so that we can replace pkg_install and > do some cleanup in the ports tree, add the "must have" features while > doing that. And only w

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-31 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/3/31 Andriy Gapon : > on 29/03/2011 23:29 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: >> ok let's try to say it simpler :) the main goal is to keep it simple >> for now, simple and rock solid, so that we can replace pkg_install and >> do some cleanup in the ports tree, add the "must have" features

Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 31 March 2011 10:14 am, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:21:45 -0400 > > Robert Huff articulated: > > Jerry writes: > > > > I run "nspluginwrapper -a -v -i" in that directory, as I > > > > always did after upgrading that port. > > > > I think that you are talking about that, ar

deskutils/calibre does not build after Python 2.6 to 2.7 update

2011-03-31 Thread Greg Rivers
I had to remove calibre to allow upgrade-site-packages to finish successfully during the Python update. Trying to install calibre afterwards fails: # portmaster -D deskutils/calibre ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/deskutils/calibre ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for deskutils/calibre in

Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:34 am, Barbara wrote: > >On Wednesday 30 March 2011 07:03 pm, Barbara wrote: > >> I'm referring to this commit: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=422486+0+current/cvs > >>-po rts > >> > >> After updating nspluginwrapper-devel, firefox instead of > >> rand

Re: deskutils/calibre does not build after Python 2.6 to 2.7 update

2011-03-31 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/11 1:07 PM, Greg Rivers wrote: > I had to remove calibre to allow upgrade-site-packages to finish > successfully during the Python update. Trying to install calibre > afterwards fails: > > # portmaster -D deskutils/calibre > > ===>>> Port di

Re: deskutils/calibre does not build after Python 2.6 to 2.7 update

2011-03-31 Thread Greg Rivers
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Greg Larkin wrote: Try running this command: grep WITH_EXTENSION=true /var/db/ports/sqlite3/options If that doesn't return any output, then you should reinstall databases/sqlite3 with the "loadable extensions" option turned on. Then reinstall databases/py-sqlite3 and cali

Re: [SOLVED] PORTDOCS strangeness

2011-03-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 30 March 2011 21:00, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm updating castor to the new version (thanks for the email > Portscout!), and I've decided to add in docs option. > > However... when I set PORTDOCS= * as normal, on deinstall it complains > about being unable to remove ${DOCSDIR}, yet it h

Re: deskutils/calibre does not build after Python 2.6 to 2.7 update

2011-03-31 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/11 1:49 PM, Greg Rivers wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Greg Larkin wrote: > >> Try running this command: >> >> grep WITH_EXTENSION=true /var/db/ports/sqlite3/options >> >> If that doesn't return any output, then you should reinstall >> database

Re: [SOLVED] PORTDOCS strangeness

2011-03-31 Thread Pan Tsu
Chris Rees writes: > On 30 March 2011 21:00, Chris Rees wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm updating castor to the new version (thanks for the email >> Portscout!), and I've decided to add in docs option. >> >> However... when I set PORTDOCS= * as normal, on deinstall it complains >> about being unable

R: Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Barbara
>On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:34 am, Barbara wrote: >> >On Wednesday 30 March 2011 07:03 pm, Barbara wrote: >> >> I'm referring to this commit: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=422486+0+current/cvs >> >>-po rts >> >> >> >> After updating nspluginwrapper-devel, firefox instead of >

Re: [SOLVED] PORTDOCS strangeness

2011-03-31 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2011-03-31 23:25, Pan Tsu wrote: > Chris Rees writes: ... > + @${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR} > + @${TAR} cf - -C${WRKSRC}/doc . | ${TAR} xof - -C${DOCSDIR} > Please use the preferred ${COPYTREE_SHARE} instead of ${TAR} -@${TAR} cf - -C${WRKSRC}/doc . | ${TAR} xof - -C${DOCSDIR} +@(cd ${WRKS

Re: Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Barbara wrote: > >>On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:34 am, Barbara wrote: >>> >On Wednesday 30 March 2011 07:03 pm, Barbara wrote: >>> >> I'm referring to this commit: >>> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=422486+0+current/cvs >>> >>-po rts >>> >> >>> >> A

Re: R: Re: firefox 4 crashes after last nspluginwrapper-devel

2011-03-31 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 31 March 2011 06:27 pm, Barbara wrote: > >On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:34 am, Barbara wrote: > >> >On Wednesday 30 March 2011 07:03 pm, Barbara wrote: > >> >> I'm referring to this commit: > >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=422486+0+current/ > >> >>cvs -po rts > >> >> >

Automating Port Building- Setting options on the command line

2011-03-31 Thread Patrick Powell
First, before you tell me to do it, I have already RTFM, done a google search, and even looked for examples. Here is what I am trying to do. I have to generate a set of packages for amd64 and i386 systems. I usually have a simple script that does: cd /usr/ports/XXX make make install make p

Re: Automating Port Building- Setting options on the command line

2011-03-31 Thread Jason Helfman
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:49:06PM -0700, Patrick Powell thus spake: First, before you tell me to do it, I have already RTFM, done a google search, and even looked for examples. Here is what I am trying to do. I have to generate a set of packages for amd64 and i386 systems. I usually have a

Re: Automating Port Building- Setting options on the command line

2011-03-31 Thread Patrick Powell
On 03/31/11 17:48, Jason Helfman wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:49:06PM -0700, Patrick Powell thus spake: First, before you tell me to do it, I have already RTFM, done a google search, and even looked for examples. Here is what I am trying to do. I have to generate a set of packages for

Re: Automating Port Building- Setting options on the command line

2011-03-31 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/31/2011 18:03, Patrick Powell wrote: Is there an idiot simple, put this on the command line alternative to this to handle the 3 (three) ports that require me to hand tune them? No. The ports tree is not designed to do what you want it to do, sorry. If it's only 3 ports, apologies if I do

Removing Cruft from the ports tree

2011-03-31 Thread Eitan Adler
Hi, I’m been working recently on a series of PRs that called “Reaper of the Dead” PRs. I have been going through the various build files we have (for source, docs, and especially ports) and attempting to remove dead code, old cruft, and unneeded checks. Some examples include ports/155543, port

Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree

2011-03-31 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hi, > >I’m been working recently on a series of PRs that called “Reaper > of the Dead” PRs. I have been going through the various build files we > have (for source, docs, and especially ports) and attempting to remove > dead code, old cru

Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree

2011-03-31 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2011/4/1 Eitan Adler : > Hi, > >    I’m been working recently on a series of PRs that called “Reaper > of the Dead” PRs. I have been going through the various build files we > have (for source, docs, and especially ports) and attempting to remove > dead code, old cruft, and unneeded checks. Some ex

Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree

2011-03-31 Thread Zhihao Yuan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>    I’m been working recently on a series of PRs that called “Reaper >> of the Dead” PRs. I have been going through the various build files we >> have (for source, d

Re: Automating Port Building- Setting options on the command line

2011-03-31 Thread Alberto Villa
On Friday 01 April 2011 02:49:06 Patrick Powell wrote: > What I would like to do is pass in a set of default options on the > command line > such as: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions > make configure THIS=yes THAT=no cd /usr/ports/multimedia/kdenlive make -DWITH_DVD -DWITH_FREI0R -DWITHOUT_

Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree

2011-03-31 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:55:02PM -0400 I heard the voice of Eitan Adler, and lo! it spake thus: > > Not only that but because maintainers would be able to choose the > best possible configuration for the their port users would no longer > have to mess around. This doesn't sound like a good idea

Re: Removing Cruft from the ports tree

2011-03-31 Thread b. f.
> Hi, > > I’m been working recently on a series of PRs that called “Reaper I'm glad to see that you're helping to clean up. > > One of the features that has given us the most trouble has been > the options framework for ports. We automatically test ports using the > default options, b