Re: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'

2011-02-28 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 28/02/2011 00:41 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied >> below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now. > > The problem seems to be with libtool. If I run a command like: >

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2011-02-28 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

Re: pdnsd leaking udp sockets

2011-02-28 Thread Marius Nünnerich
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 21:34, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: > Hi Marius, > > Marius Nünnerich writes: > > [...] > >> Ok, I applied the patch and reinstalled the port. I will leave it >> running for a few days and report back. So far it's looking good. >> Thank you very much! :) > OK, I had it running for

Re: pdnsd leaking udp sockets

2011-02-28 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Marius Nünnerich writes: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 21:34, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> Hi Marius, >> >> Marius Nünnerich writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> Ok, I applied the patch and reinstalled the port. I will leave it >>> running for a few days and report back. So far it's looking good. >>> Thank you ve

Re: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'

2011-02-28 Thread b. f.
> > On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied > >> below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now. > >> > >> The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is > >> include

Re: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'

2011-02-28 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
b. f. wrote: On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now. The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx is included twice at s

pr 155131

2011-02-28 Thread Dean Freeman
the distinfo portion of my udiff should be removed from the patch i supplied earlier for the DAQ port. Apparently the tarball got garbled slightly on Sourceforge earlier and that's why the file size was off. We re-uploaded and the file size and sha256 hash are back to being normal. -- Dean Free

Re: xf86-video-ati 6.14.0 crashes System

2011-02-28 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Feb-27 20:50:03 +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >Also reported by me for the ATI Radeon RV370 X300 SE and somebody >else for a differently branded card with the same chip. Breaks my ATI Technologies Inc RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)] as well. I have discovered that disabling DRI or accele

Re: pr 155131

2011-02-28 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:26:12PM -0500, Dean Freeman wrote: > the distinfo portion of my udiff should be removed from the patch i supplied > earlier for the DAQ port. Apparently the tarball got garbled slightly on > Sourceforge earlier and that's why the file size was off. We re-uploaded > and

xz

2011-02-28 Thread ajtiM
Hi! Today I tried to run portmaster -ad on FreeBSD 8.2 and I got: portmaster -ad ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates ===>>> Launching child to update xz-5.0.0 to xz-5.0.1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/archivers/xz

Re: xz

2011-02-28 Thread Rene Ladan
Op 28-02-2011 23:31, ajtiM schreef: > Hi! > > Today I tried to run portmaster -ad on FreeBSD 8.2 and I got: > portmaster -ad > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates > ===>>> Launching child to update xz-5.0.0 to xz-5.

Re: xz

2011-02-28 Thread lum...@gmail.com
Thank you. BTW: this problem exist more than one year. Sent from my HTC Inspire™ 4G on AT&T - Reply message - From: "Rene Ladan" To: "ajtiM" Cc: Subject: xz Date: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 16:46 Op 28-02-2011 23:31, ajtiM schreef: > Hi! > > Today I tried to run portmaster -ad on FreeBSD 8.

Re: xz

2011-02-28 Thread Scott Lambert
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:31:27PM -0600, ajtiM wrote: > Than If I run: > portmaster -e xz-5.0.0 > ===>>> Warning: Ports with dependencies on xz-5.0.0: > k9copy-2.3.4_4 > kde4-4.5.5_1 > kdebase-4.5.5 > kdenetwork-4.5.5_2 > kdesdk-4.5.5_1 > kdeutils-4.

SIGBUS running `gpg-agent --daemon`

2011-02-28 Thread Yuri Pankov
Hi, Guys, I'm getting the same SIGBUS when running `gpg-agent --daemon` as you discussed on cvs-ports@ list. I'm not sure about the fix, so I have created the entry in gnupg bugtracker: https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1320 JFYI, Yuri ___ freebsd-po

Re: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'

2011-02-28 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: b. f. wrote: On Sun 27 Feb 2011 at 12:24:06 PST Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am the maintainer of the port vis5d+. I just got this email (copied below) saying that vis5d+ isn't building right now. The issue seems to be that some reference to __i686.get_pc

Re: SIGBUS running `gpg-agent --daemon`

2011-02-28 Thread Doug Barton
On 2/28/2011 8:00 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: Hi, Guys, I'm getting the same SIGBUS when running `gpg-agent --daemon` as you discussed on cvs-ports@ list. I'm not sure about the fix, so I have created the entry in gnupg bugtracker: https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1320 Thanks, hopefully they can

net/samba-libsmbclient SAMBA_PORT= -> SAMBA_PORT?=

2011-02-28 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Timur, Could you please change the SAMBA_PORT= directive in samba-libsmbclient to SAMBA_PORT?= samba34 so it can be overridden by make.conf or command line ? There is probably some bad magic that will happen on a machine with samba35 install