Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

2011-02-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > >> I only just noticed that you've added a port for xpra. > >> I wasn't aware of that and you're pointing to the source on my server, > >> so I guess that it means I have to be careful not to remove it from now on? > > > > The files should eventually get automatically mirrored to the FreeBS

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

2011-02-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > There are always hosts out there that still have old port Makefiles > > on their disks, so having a stable path would be useful. > Well, in truth, the port's Makefile may be trivially configured to look > into the old/ subdirectory if the distfile is not found in the "real" one > (see the

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

2011-02-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:49:39AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > >> I only just noticed that you've added a port for xpra. > > >> I wasn't aware of that and you're pointing to the source on my server, > > >> so I guess that it means I have to be careful not to remove it from now > > >> on

Re: security/rkhunter 1.3.8 - false warning?

2011-02-04 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Update: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hi, > > rkhunter 1.3.8 from ports complains about the /etc/passwd file. Why > does it do that? > From /var/log/rkhunter.log: > [03:01:30]   /etc/passwd                                     [ Warning ] > [03:01:30] Warning: The file

Re: FreeBSD Port: minidlna-2010.12.12

2011-02-04 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Jan, good day. Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:50:34AM +0100, Jan ??olc wrote: > With help from the maker of miniupnpd I have done patches for minidlna. > > patch-ssdpd ??? minidlna can use minissdpd when you need using more > upnp services at once (in example miniupnpd and minidlna > simultaneously). >

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/2/3 Robert Huff : > Chip Camden writes: > >>  Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet? > >        I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday. > Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO. >        After minimal testing, it appears to behave c

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Olivier Smedts on Friday, 04 February 2011: > 2011/2/3 Robert Huff : > > Chip Camden writes: > > > >>  Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet? > > > >        I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday. > > Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Robert Huff
Olivier Smedts writes: > >>  Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet? > > > >        I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday. > > Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO. > >        After minimal testing, it appears to behave correctly

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final (final test here...)

2011-02-04 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
There is a final "bug" in the package list when you define in the options (make config) gnome=yes the pkg-plist builds the +CONTENTS with a "/" in front of the gnome file list Solution: edit the pkg-plist and remove the first "/" from the GNOMEOPT at line 1791, 1792 make reinstall package, and t

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden écrivait : > It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase > still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic > link to /usr/tmp, and then it installed OK. My usual /tmp partition has > 500MB -- why

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Thierry Thomas on Friday, 04 February 2011: > Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden > écrivait : > > > It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase > > still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic > > link to /usr/tmp, and the

KDE on FreeBSD 8.1 - Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus

2011-02-04 Thread Bahman Kahinpour
Hello, I have installed X.org and KDE on my FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (directly from the packages collection on the Installation DVD-ROM) and I have taken these steps: +/etc/rc.conf: dbus_enable="YES" +/etc/rc.conf: hald_enable="YES" and also: I have added startkde4 to .xinitrc While using KDE, I conti

Re: FreeBSD Port: minidlna-2010.12.12

2011-02-04 Thread Mikhail T.
On 04.02.2011 05:50, Jan Solc wrote: With help from the maker of miniupnpd I have done patches for minidlna. patch-ssdpd - minidlna can use minissdpd when you need using more upnp services at once (in example miniupnpd and minidlna simultaneously). patch-zsamsung - it's latest

Re: KDE on FreeBSD 8.1 - Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus

2011-02-04 Thread Alexey Serebryakoff
This is my /etc/rc.conf ... hald_enable="YES" polkitd_enable="YES"

PR153950, Repocopy complete but port not available yet

2011-02-04 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153950 The repocopy is complete but the port is not available yet. A few poeple already emailed me so I just would like to know why it is not available yet. Due to the upcoming release of 8.2? Thanks, Helmut

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Thierry Thomas writes: > Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden > écrivait : > >> It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase >> still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic >> link to /usr/tmp, and then it installed OK. My usual

Re: PR153950, Repocopy complete but port not available yet

2011-02-04 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:07:40PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote: > The repocopy is complete but the port is not available yet. A few > poeple already emailed me so I just would like to know why it is not > available yet. Due to the upcoming release of 8.2? No, adding new ports is allowed during m

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final

2011-02-04 Thread Charlie Kester
On Fri 04 Feb 2011 at 10:58:28 PST Lowell Gilbert wrote: Thierry Thomas writes: Le ven 4 fév 11 à 17:01:37 +0100, Chip Camden écrivait : It finally came through on portsnap late yesterday. The install phase still filled up my /tmp drive, so I had to umount /tmp, create a symbolic link to

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

2011-02-04 Thread Doug Barton
I'm confused. Why are we not using the sources from the "regular" location, and patching to make them work for us? And has anyone contacted the upstream about the changes and why they are necessary? This whole thing seems very confusing to me (but that's not saying much). :) Doug -- N

Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final (final test here...)

2011-02-04 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/04/2011 08:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: There is a final "bug" in the package list when you define in the options (make config) gnome=yes the pkg-plist builds the +CONTENTS with a "/" in front of the gnome file list Solution: edit the pkg-plist and remove the first "/" from the GNOM

Re: PR153950, Repocopy complete but port not available yet

2011-02-04 Thread Helmut Schneider
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:07:40PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > The repocopy is complete but the port is not available yet. A few > > poeple already emailed me so I just would like to know why it is not > > available yet. Due to the upcoming release of 8.2? > > No, add

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

2011-02-04 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi Doug, The last proper file release from upstream was 0.0.6 in November 2009. Since then, I've fixed a number of things (from typos to build fixes for some platforms), supported new platforms (mac osx, I originally added win32 support but the author then re-wrote that), etc Any help in getting

Re: FreeBSD Port: xpra-0.0.7.16p4

2011-02-04 Thread Doug Barton
To the extent I understand all this, it sounds reasonable, albeit complex. You might want to consider setting up a new project on sourceforge, google code, etc. but I'll leave that up to you and swills. Thanks for answering my questions. Doug On 02/04/2011 13:59, Antoine Martin wrote: Hi D

Re: KDE on FreeBSD 8.1 - Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus

2011-02-04 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Bahman Kahinpour writes: > Hello, > > I have installed X.org and KDE on my FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (directly > from the packages collection on the Installation DVD-ROM) and I have > taken these steps: > +/etc/rc.conf: dbus_enable="YES" > +/etc/rc.conf: hald_enable="YES" > and also: > I have added sta

Re: security/rkhunter 1.3.8 - false warning?

2011-02-04 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/05/2011 00:31, Vaida Bogdan wrote: Hi, I'm no longer the maintainer of this port, please remove me from there. Done. Thanks for your work on this port in the past. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Bread

[CFT] xf86-video-ati 6.14.0

2011-02-04 Thread Martin Wilke
Howdy, 2 days ago was a new ati driver released. fluffy@ and me was using for few weeks the git version without problems, but we’d like to make sure this dosen’t broke anything for our ati users. Here is a patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/ati-6140.diff