Hi !
While struggling with DATADIR-safety messages from portlint, I've
noticed something very odd : DATADIR, which is supposed to be an
absolute path, is recorded as a relative path (to ${PREFIX}, I suppose)
in pkg-plist.
This leads to being unable to deinstall a port which has been installed
wit
Hello.
I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found
myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically,
in most cases I get the error:
XDM authorization key matches an existing
client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin
"Ganael LAPLANCHE" writes:
> # make DATADIR=/tmp/pciids deinstall
> ===> Deinstalling for misc/pciids
> ===> Deinstalling pciids-20101124
> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local//tmp/pciids/pci.ids' doesn't exist
> pkg_delete: file '/usr/local//tmp/pciids' doesn't exist
> pkg_delete: unable to complete
"O. Hartmann" writes:
> Hello.
> I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found
> myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically,
> in most cases I get the error:
>
> XDM authorization key matches an existing
> client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/open
2011/2/2 Sam Fourman Jr. :
>
>> nice thank you very much for the tests now it is in the ports tree.
>>
>
>
>
> I am using FreeBSD 9-CURRENT amd64 and a fresh ports tree
> my build is failing, what can i do?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> sw deliver
> Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 281 files unc
I've put a port of Slatec together:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151970
Recently I realised that some 110 routines in Slatec
are already present in math/blas, and the Blas versions
seem to be newer.
% ar -t /usr/local/lib/libblas.a | sort > blas.sorted
% ar -t /usr/local/lib/l
> nice thank you very much for the tests now it is in the ports tree.
>
>
I am using FreeBSD 9-CURRENT amd64 and a fresh ports tree
my build is failing, what can i do?
sw deliver
Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 281 files unchanged
---
02.02.2011, 13:28, "Anton Shterenlikht" :
> I've put a port of Slatec together:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151970
>
> Recently I realised that some 110 routines in Slatec
> are already present in math/blas, and the Blas versions
> seem to be newer.
>
> % ar -t /usr/local/l
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 01:31:50PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
> 02.02.2011, 13:28, "Anton Shterenlikht" :
> > I've put a port of Slatec together:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151970
> >
> > Recently I realised that some 110 routines in Slatec
> > are already pres
Hello, another build failure here :)
amd64, 9.0-current, building from ports.
# make showconfig
===> The following configuration options are available for libreoffice-3.3.0:
WEBDAV=off "Support webdav protocol"
CUPS=off "Support cups for printing"
KDE4=on "With Qt4/KDE4 vclplug sup
2011/2/2 George Liaskos :
> Hello, another build failure here :)
>
> amd64, 9.0-current, building from ports.
>
> # make showconfig
> ===> The following configuration options are available for libreoffice-3.3.0:
> WEBDAV=off "Support webdav protocol"
> CUPS=off "Support cups for printing"
>
On Wednesday February 2 2011 05:50:52 George Liaskos wrote:
> Hello, another build failure here :)
>
First, thank you very much for the LibreOffice. I installed it from the ports
and it works perfect and faster on my system then OO whch I deinstalled :).
What doesn't work for now is just "systr
> I realise that fortran numerical libraries will
> not interest many, so perhaps this is irrelevant anyway..
>
I guess ones who are interested will prefer to have a choice of BLAS
implementation depending on target hardware, parallelization scales,
peculiarities of problem, personal preference
2011/2/2 ajtiM :
> On Wednesday February 2 2011 05:50:52 George Liaskos wrote:
>> Hello, another build failure here :)
>>
>
> First, thank you very much for the LibreOffice. I installed it from the ports
> and it works perfect and faster on my system then OO whch I deinstalled :).
>
> What doesn't
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:17:13 +0300, Anonymous wrote
Hi,
> You cannot define DATADIR that's PREFIX-unsafe without using @cwd.
> And using @cwd makes `-p/-P' options in pkg_add(1) less useful.
>
> Not sure why portlint even mentions safeness for
> DOCSDIR/EXAMPLESDIR/DATADIR as they were never saf
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:21:21 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/2/2 George Liaskos :
> > Hello, another build failure here :)
> >
> > amd64, 9.0-current, building from ports.
> >
> > # make showconfig
> > ===> The following configuration options are available for
> > libreoffice-3.3.0:
> >
> I can see benefits and disadvantages of having same
> routines in different libraries. Advantages are
> that a user can choose to only install Slatec,
> with no Blas, and that no fine tuning of the
> distribution is required.
> Disadvantages could be extra size and potential
> for confusion, e.g.
[1]Cartões Mais Barato
Pensando no Produto mais barato que existe?
Só aqui é mais barato!
[2]Cartões de visita Para você vender mais e lucrar mais.
[3]Varios pontos de distribuição em São paulo
Entregas em todo Brasil
[4]Cartões Mais Barato
A Cartoes Mais Barat
I did a recompile with kde integration disabled and it failed again.
---
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
http://wiki
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
>
> Can you please test it?
>
> by default it builds without java.
2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko :
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
>> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice
>>
>> Can you please test it?
>
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko :
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or
> >>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Joseph Olatt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble getting x11-wm/awesome (3.4.9) to start up. I'm
> getting the following error on start up.
>
> W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image
> /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, tha
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Sam Fourman Jr. :
>>
>>> nice thank you very much for the tests now it is in the ports tree.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I am using FreeBSD 9-CURRENT amd64 and a fresh ports tree
>> my build is failing, what can i do?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> sw
2011/2/2 Steve Randall :
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko :
>> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
>> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all
>> >>
>> >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here:
>> >> http://people.free
2011/1/31 Martin Wilke :
> Hello Internet,
>
> The FreeBSD KDE Team is happy to let you know that KDE SC 4.6.0 has been
> released a few Days ago, and the Release is ready for a public test. Before
> you ask, no, we do not want to put KDE 4.6.0 in the ports tree before
> FreeBSD 8.2/7.4 is released
Any news about a fix or something ?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:57:47 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Steve Randall :
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100
> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko :
> >> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100
> >> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all
> >> >
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 01:09 pm, LOL wrote:
> Any news about a fix or something ?
As I said, it seems Freedesktop.org fixed the problem for UMS case.
So, you have two choices, a) wait for the next vendor release or b)
check out head of xf86-video-ati from Freedesktop.org git and build
i
> I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
> that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
> counts 178 missing files.
>
> 19 have "x86_64" in their paths. These directories do not exist on my
> system, but I have directories with "x86" in the nam
Dear list,
since there is no maintainer for net/mpich2 I am writing directly to the
list. Hope this is ok.
I need MPICH2 for math/R (package Rmpi) and others (e.g. upcoming new
package math/sprng, PR 154249). Software using MPICH2 complains about
'undefined symbols' like 'MPL_trfree'.
Look
On 01/26/2011 11:50, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Just a small notice:
The V4L DVB options depends on: DVBPSI=ON
I moved the --enable-dvb to the DVBPSI section with 1.1.7. These are not
features I am able to test myself. Does this address the issue? V4L is needed
for viewing webcams atta
Le mer 2 fév 11 à 21:54:34 +0100, Rainer Hurling
écrivait :
> Dear list,
Hello,
> since there is no maintainer for net/mpich2 I am writing directly to the
> list. Hope this is ok.
>
> I need MPICH2 for math/R (package Rmpi) and others (e.g. upcoming new
> package math/sprng, PR 154249). Sof
From: Baptiste Daroussin
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:44:45 +
> 2011/2/2 Maho NAKATA :
>> Hi bapt,
>>
>> Following port built fine on my tinderbox (8.1-RELEASE/amd64)
>>
>> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/commit/
>> author Baptiste Darou
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011 01:09 pm, LOL wrote:
> > Any news about a fix or something ?
>
> As I said, it seems Freedesktop.org fixed the problem for UMS case.
> So, you have two choices, a) wait for the next vendor release or b)
> check out
At the end of the port build there is a message that says ADS support was not
included in the build. Does this mean that even if you added ADS support in the
port config, it is still not in the build? If so, why the option?
Sent from my iPad
David M. Wassman, MCSE, CCENT, Security+
Carr, Rig
Hi!
You should distinct between *packages*, which a precompiled ready to
install binaries and *ports*, which are merely recipies how to
assemble binaries with the options you like.
The message stresses that *package* doesn't include ADS functionality
and that you have to compile port yourself.
R
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:47:08 Joseph S. Atkinson wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 11:50, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a small notice:
> >
> > The V4L DVB options depends on: DVBPSI=ON
>
> I moved the --enable-dvb to the DVBPSI section with 1.1.7. These are not
> features I am a
38 matches
Mail list logo