Re: drupal6

2011-01-06 Thread wen heping
Hi, Drupal7 released! Would you send a PR of repocopy of it ? wen 2011/1/3 wen heping : > It is time to send a PR to request repocopy drupal6 --> drupal7 . > > wen > > 2011/1/2 David Southwell ARPS : >>> On 2 Jan 2011, at 15:40, David Southwell ARPS wrote: >>> > Any chance of a ports upgrade

Re: drupal6

2011-01-06 Thread Marin Atanasov Nikolov
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, wen heping wrote: > Hi, Hi, > >   Drupal7 released! Would you send a PR of repocopy of it ? I was about of sending a request for adding Drupal 7 to the ports tree, but I see you've already started the discussion :) Anyone working on this one already? Regards, M

Re: java/netbeans segfaults

2011-01-06 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:13:58 +0100, David Demelier a écrit : > Hello, Hello, > I just wanted to try netbeans here on FreeBSD : > Is it possible that openjdk could be the problem? Try it, here Netbeans 6.9.1 works fine with the Sun JDK (except the profiler). I use it on 8.1 and -STABLE but on a

Re: jpeg build problem

2011-01-06 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:00:03AM +0100, Radek Krej?a wrote: > Hi, I have problem with build of jpeg from ports - latest ports, csup > 10 minutes ago. > > => Attempting to fetch from http://www.ijg.org/files/. > jpegsrc.v8b.tar.gz > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===>

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-06 Thread Wesley Shields
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:14:26AM -0800, Douglas Thrift wrote: > Hello, > > Since ISC dhcpd 4.1 now supports DHCPv6, but a single instance of the > daemon can't do both IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6, it would be nice if the rc.d > script from the port could be configured to start the daemon twice. Has > a

print/teTeX-base failed to install on ia64

2011-01-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
I've no problems updating to teTeX-base-3.0_21 on amd64 and on sparc64. HOwever, on ia64 I get this error on "make install": *snip* install -o root -g wheel -m 444 ./mktex.opt /usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/mktex.opt install -o root -g wheel -m 555 ./mktexdir /usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/mktexdi

Re: print/teTeX-base failed to install on ia64

2011-01-06 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:59:44PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I've no problems updating to teTeX-base-3.0_21 on amd64 and > on sparc64. HOwever, on ia64 I get this error on "make install": > > *snip* > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 ./mktex.opt > /usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/mktex.opt >

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-06 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/05/2011 01:14, Douglas Thrift wrote: Hello, Since ISC dhcpd 4.1 now supports DHCPv6, but a single instance of the daemon can't do both IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6, it would be nice if the rc.d script from the port could be configured to start the daemon twice. Has anyone thought about this at all

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-06 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:49:36PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/05/2011 01:14, Douglas Thrift wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Since ISC dhcpd 4.1 now supports DHCPv6, but a single instance of the > > daemon can't do both IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6, it would be nice if the rc.d > > script from the port cou

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-06 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:49:36PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 01/05/2011 01:14, Douglas Thrift wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Since ISC dhcpd 4.1 now supports DHCPv6, but a single instance of the > > > daemon can't do both IPv

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-06 Thread Freddie Cash
The OpenVPN port does a pretty good job of this. Default rc.d script is just openvpn. But you can create manual symlinks to it using openvpn_somename, and it checks rc.conf for openvpn_somename_enable. Having to manually create the symlink is kind of needed in the openvpn setup and can lead to l

Re: Xfce 4.8pre3

2011-01-06 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Bernhard Froehlich wrote: http://home.bluelife.at/patches/xfce48.tgz Wouldn't it be a good to talk to oliver@ first before duplicating all the work? I'm right now working on a new archive with the latest 4.8.pre version of Xfce based on miwi's work. --

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2011-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2011-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2011-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2011-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2011-01-06 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th