Re: Use of license in ports Makefile

2010-10-29 Thread Carmel
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:37:02 -0400 Sahil Tandon articulated: > On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 18:52:42 -0400, Carmel wrote: > > > I have a application that I want to port to FreeBSD. It is licensed > > under the BSD license from what I can understand. In the new port's > > Makefile, would I just put some

Re: Use of license in ports Makefile

2010-10-29 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 28/10/2010 00:52, Carmel wrote: > I have a application that I want to port to FreeBSD. It is licensed > under the BSD license from what I can understand. In the new port's > Makefile, would I just put something like this: > ... To my understanding this LICENSE stuff is not mature. And the more

Re: Use of license in ports Makefile

2010-10-29 Thread Alberto Villa
On Friday 29 October 2010 10:58:49 Carmel wrote: > Should I just remove them and place the ".include " entry > in their place; or add it to the list of other includes? I cannot find > any documentation specifically defining what to do. I thought I had read > the Porter's Handbook thoroughly, but

Re: Use of license in ports Makefile

2010-10-29 Thread Carmel
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:21:34 + Alberto Villa articulated: > On Friday 29 October 2010 10:58:49 Carmel wrote: > > Should I just remove them and place the ".include " > entry > > in their place; or add it to the list of other includes? I cannot > > find any documentation specifically defining

Re: pkg_add -r could be better?

2010-10-29 Thread Sean McAfee
On 10/28/10 18:57, Aragon Gouveia wrote: Hi, On 10/28/10 22:07, Sean McAfee wrote: Why are you using -r (which fetches the default packages from freebsd.org/mirrors) in conjunction with custom packages? My intention is to serve them to multiple systems from a single FTP/HTTP server. I set PAC

Re: ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64

2010-10-29 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Addendum: I believe doing this with a specific port for amd64, at least initially is a good idea, and making this a slave port of emulators/wine so that things like constantly changing pkg-plist and general updates come for free. I am also happy to make adjustments to that port, as long as the "

Re: File ownership being changed to root:wheel ownership after copying to samba server

2010-10-29 Thread Troy
On 10/28/2010 10:15 AM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Troy wrote: A very strange problem just started happening with Samba after I upgraded to version samba34-3.4.9 on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE. Let's say my username is foobar. I copy a file named To Fix.txt from a win