Quoting Chris Forgeron (from Wed, 06 Oct 2010
11:45:03 -0300):
I'd like to step up and offer to modernize and maintain the ICC port
for FreeBSD.
I may be crazy, specially as 9 is going towards Clang/LLVM. With
that move, there may be a lot of very talented people modifying the
build/ma
Hello,
I have several questions concerning creating Makefile
I don't understand in what sequence USE_* flags in Makefile are processed,
for example - in archives/jzlib/Makefile add
USE_APACHE=22, before
USE_JAVA=yes
USE_JAVA=1.4+
but when i execute make install, first install JAVA.
Is it
Hello.
I've seen interesting commit message in postgresql90-server port: "Also,
try to break the previous 1:1 relation between FreeBSD system and
PostgreSQL versions installed. Use different PREFIX:es to install
different versions on the same system."
I've fetched new version of ports and tried
Hi,
True, it is a first shot at breaking the 1:1 relationship, it is not a
solution. I think that if you install all PostgreSQL:s in different
PREFIXes, it will work to install them.
As you say, they should opimtally install in their own non-conflicting
places without changing prefix.
Lets
--On 7 oktober 2010 15.06.37 +0200 Palle Girgensohn
wrote:
Hi,
True, it is a first shot at breaking the 1:1 relationship, it is not a
solution. I think that if you install all PostgreSQL:s in different
PREFIXes, it will work to install them.
or if you install in prefix first...
or manual
Hello.
Just a notice. It seems it will not work to install different postgresql
versions in different PREFIX'es at least because of bsd.databases.mk:
lines 181 - 186: if we look at postgresql version in $LOCALBASE, it will
be different from one from $PREFIX.
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
True, it
Please see ports/150493 for someone who seems to be looking at it.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The new version of mutt-devel nolonger honors my mailcap entry to invoke lynx
when it encounters a text/html file type. Instead it simply displays the raw
html text. According to their UPDATING file, they say:
"all text/* parts can be displayed inline without mailcap"
Which is suspiciously in
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:22:09AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> The new version of mutt-devel nolonger honors my mailcap entry to invoke lynx
> when it encounters a text/html file type. Instead it simply displays the raw
> html text. According to their UPDATING file, they say:
>
> "all text/* p
Chris Jones posted a pf action for fail2ban over a year ago with the
suggestion that it should be added to the official port. I've attached a
patch to include in the port which provides the bsd-pf action out of the
box.
Can this be included into the fail2ban port?
Regards
--
John Bayly
Syst
True, if you start by installing the client, then the server, then contrib,
then it work. Otherwise, the LOCALBASE stuff screws things up.
--On 7 oktober 2010 17.17.38 +0400 Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
Just a notice. It seems it will not work to install different postgresql
versions in di
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 06:51:38AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:22:09AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > The new version of mutt-devel nolonger honors my mailcap entry to invoke
> > lynx
> > when it encounters a text/html file type. Instead it simply displays the raw
> >
I just want to report that it seems that portsnap5.FreeBSD.org is not
responding.
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... failed.
...
___
freebsd-ports@fre
What's holding it against updating to a more recent version, e.g 2.0.3?
Does any port depend on it, excluding fasl?
I want to convert stumpwm to bsd.cl-asdf.mk. In order to do it I need
textproc/cl-ppcre and x11/cl-clx ports. I've made a port for the latter.
However, stumpwm doesn't like the old v
Hi,
I've seen the security alert for the current horde-base (3.3.8) port.
It looks like 3.3.9 was released just over a week ago, and the release
notes seem to indicate it fixes the security problems.
I also see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151191, but
I have no idea if that p
On 07/10/2010 21:47:34, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen the security alert for the current horde-base (3.3.8) port.
>
> It looks like 3.3.9 was released just over a week ago, and the release
> notes seem to indicate it fixes the security problems.
>
> I also see http://www.freebsd.org/cg
Your mail to 'sage-members' with the subject
Mqdrrxknlafvix
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
