lighttpd/1.4.28 + lighttpd-mod_h264_streaming won't start

2010-09-30 Thread Paul Macdonald
Hi, After an update to lighttpd today, the server won't start with the mod_h264_streaming module (it does otherwise). This was also the same on a fresh build on 8.1 release, (with the new lighttpd config format) There's nothing in the error logs (other than reporting the server started!)

Re: libgpod

2010-09-30 Thread Alberto Villa
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 21:21:26 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > would anyone happen to have a port patch for the new libgpod i had one, and sent it to danfe, but afaik he's busy with real life. i'll try to clean it up and make it committable. it's not an easy task, because it requires the porti

Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275

2010-09-30 Thread Paolo Bormida
Hi, I am here again with a consideration about the choiche to use a snapshot for the amule port. I understand maintaing a port is an huge gift to the FreeBSD community, and gratitude goes to those, such as you, that do this job. It is not my goal to ask you to steer the port in the direction tha

Re: lighttpd/1.4.28 + lighttpd-mod_h264_streaming won't start

2010-09-30 Thread Steven Hartland
Not really an answer to your problem but we've found nginx works very well with this. Tried lighttpd and had no end of problems with it nginx just works. If you switch to nginx I'd advise going with the dev version which has quite a few new features and fixes and again never had any issues with. /

Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275

2010-09-30 Thread Anonymous
Paolo Bormida writes: > I understand maintaing a port is an huge gift to the FreeBSD > community, and gratitude goes to those, such as you, that do this > job. Keep the thanks for previous maintainers. It seems like I've contributed only confusion. > I have built and installed the port on SPARC

Re: libgpod

2010-09-30 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:18:22PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Wednesday 29 September 2010 21:21:26 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > > would anyone happen to have a port patch for the new libgpod > > i had one, and sent it to danfe, but afaik he's busy with real life. i'll try > to clean it up and m

Re: libgpod

2010-09-30 Thread Romain Tartière
Hi On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:21:26PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > would anyone happen to have a port patch for the new libgpod > http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkpod/files/libgpod/libgpod-0.7.9x/libgpod-0.7.95.tar.gz/download I was just digging in this: multimedia/banshee can conditionally

some problem with portsnap servers?

2010-09-30 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi! I have not have any updates from aprox 2010/09/30 14:00 +0400. portsnap says that ports tree is up to date all the time. It's just me or anybody have this problem right now? -- Regards, Ruslan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: some problem with portsnap servers?

2010-09-30 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Ruslan Mahmatkhanov on Thursday, 30 September 2010: > Hi! > > I have not have any updates from aprox 2010/09/30 14:00 +0400. portsnap > says that ports tree is up to date all the time. It's just me or anybody > have this problem right now? > Same here -- but I just assumed there haven't

Re: some problem with portsnap servers?

2010-09-30 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
30.09.2010 23:38, Chip Camden пишет: Quoth Ruslan Mahmatkhanov on Thursday, 30 September 2010: Hi! I have not have any updates from aprox 2010/09/30 14:00 +0400. portsnap says that ports tree is up to date all the time. It's just me or anybody have this problem right now? Same here -- but I

Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275

2010-09-30 Thread Paolo Bormida
2010/9/30 Anonymous > Paolo Bormida writes: > > > I understand maintaing a port is an huge gift to the FreeBSD > > community, and gratitude goes to those, such as you, that do this > > job. > > Keep the thanks for previous maintainers. It seems like I've contributed > only confusion. > Have you

Re: Using portmaster with different PYTHON_VERSION

2010-09-30 Thread Doug Barton
On 9/29/2010 1:57 PM, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: Hello! 2010/9/28 Doug Barton: I would also argue that there is a fundamental assumption in the ports infrastructure that what you're doing here (installing both versions on the same system) is not supported. The ability to make the version of t

package generation on FreeBSD ftp server

2010-09-30 Thread Rainer Hurling
I have a question about packages at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/ . They are automatically generated from time to time. I understand that this depends on computing capacities on the server farm etc. So some packages are relatively new, some are older and some are missing...

Re: package generation on FreeBSD ftp server

2010-09-30 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:17:53AM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: > I have a question about packages at > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/ . > > They are automatically generated from time to time. I understand > that this depends on computing capacities on the server farm etc. So >

Re: Using portmaster with different PYTHON_VERSION

2010-09-30 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 01/10/2010 01:04, Doug Barton wrote: > On 9/29/2010 1:57 PM, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >> Hello! >> >> 2010/9/28 Doug Barton: >>> >>> I would also argue that there is a fundamental assumption in the ports >>> infrastructure that what you're doing here (installing both versions >>> on the >>> s