Hi,
I'm experiencing problems running ClamAV 0.96.2 on FreeBSD 7.1 (i386).
The clamd will stop working immediately after startup. The process
is still there, but unresponsive:
# /usr/local/bin/clamdtop
[...]
Connecting to: /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock
/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock: Resource temporari
Synopsis: [maintainer-update] multimedia/mplayer and mencoder dependency
corrections
Responsible-Changed-From-To: bapt->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: bapt
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 27 12:18:03 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Unable to find a fix so back to the pool.
Sorry
ht
On 27/08/2010 12:39, Frank Wall wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing problems running ClamAV 0.96.2 on FreeBSD 7.1 (i386).
The clamd will stop working immediately after startup. The process
is still there, but unresponsive:
i had something similar and eventually found that disabling JIT
Bytecode
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:20:23PM +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>
> i had something similar and eventually found that disabling JIT
> Bytecode compiler option, returned it to being stable.
> This only happened on one of my boxes though so i figured it was 'me'.
Thanks for the hint. Setting "By
How hard would it be to port i7z to FreeBSD? Seems like a very useful tool.
http://code.google.com/p/i7z/
Emanuel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs
Synopsis: [maintainer-update] multimedia/mplayer and mencoder dependency
corrections
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 27 13:59:43 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Canonicalize assignment.
http://www
Hi,
why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?
pkg_delete: package 'xz-4.999.9_1' is required by these other packages
and may not be deinstalled:
gtar-1.23_2
kdeutils-3.5.10_6
Heino
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
Hi!
> why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?
>
>
>
> pkg_delete: package 'xz-4.999.9_1' is required by these other packages
> and may not be deinstalled:
> gtar-1.23_2
> kdeutils-3.5.10_6
Because it became part of the base system with 8.1.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
> any issues. A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit
> host (8.1-RELEASE), where I noticed clamd (0.96.2_1) segfaults when queried.
>
> The issue seems specific to 32bit/64bit compatibility. I have
On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
>> any issues. A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit
>> host (8.1-RELEASE), where I noticed clamd (0.96.2_1) segfaults when queried.
>>
>> The issue seems
Hello,
I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
any issues. A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit
host (8.1-RELEASE), where I noticed clamd (0.96.2_1) segfaults when queried.
The issue seems specific to 32bit/64bit compatibility. I have a gdb
s
On 8/27/10 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46:48PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
any issues. A few days ago one of these jails was migra
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46:48PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit hosts without
> >> any issues. A few days ago one of these jails was migrated to a 64-bit
> >> host (8.1-RELEASE), where
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?
>>
>>
>>
>> pkg_delete: package 'xz-4.999.9_1' is required by these other packages
>> and may not be deinstalled:
>> gtar-1.23_2
>> kdeutils-3.5.10_6
>
> Because it became part of the base system with 8.1.
Ah, how can
Hi,
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:16:15 +0200
> Heino Tiedemann said:
rotkaps> Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?
>>
>>
>>
>> pkg_delete: package 'xz-4.999.9_1' is required by these other packages
>> and may not be deinstalled:
>> gtar-1.23_2
>> k
On 08/27/2010 07:21 AM, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Hi,
why is archivers/xz marked as IGNORE?
To fix up your system without rebuilding everything you could use
ports-mgmt/portmaster:
portmaster -d -e xz
portmaster --check-depends
When running the 2nd command when it tells you that xz is listed
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:06:49PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/27/10 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46:48PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit ho
On 8/27/10 1:32 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734
>
> I want to make sure I understand the environment -- on a native i386
> (32-bit) FreeBSD host, the software works fine. But on a native amd64
> (64-bit) FreeBSD host, the software
Hello, I've a question about compiling FreeRADIUS with
E-Directory support. In the FreeRADIUS 1.x branch, there is a
toggle in options for compiling with support for e-dir. In the
2.x branch, there is no toggle. I have sent an e-mail to the
FreeRADIUS mailing list and had it confirmed that FR still
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:58:25PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/27/10 1:32 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734
> >
> > I want to make sure I understand the environment -- on a native i386
> > (32-bit) FreeBSD host, the software w
On 8/27/10 2:20 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> To be honest, this is the first non-base software I've had an issue with
>> in a mixed-arch environment.
>
> Okay, so it's sort of what I thought. Your system has a series of
> include files on it that are for amd64 (64-bit), but clamav, when built
>
Hello Kostik,
On 8/27/10 2:58 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734
>
> I suspect that this was fixed in r210796/HEAD and r211138/RELENG_8.
>
I will check this out on a test machine. Thanks.
>>
>>> 2) Was the software rebuilt from so
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:58:38PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:06:49PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On 8/27/10 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46:48PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> > >> On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > >>> H
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:06:49PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 8/27/10 12:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46:48PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> On 8/27/10 12:33 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> I have a few clamav instances running in jails on 32-bit ho
Glen Barber wrote:
Hello Kostik,
On 8/27/10 2:58 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734
I suspect that this was fixed in r210796/HEAD and r211138/RELENG_8.
I will check this out on a test machine. Thanks.
2) Was the software reb
On 8/27/10 3:26 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Can you try it with original clamav 32-bit binary package?
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/clamav.tbz
>
> (or can you build your own on real 32-bit system instead of 32-bit jail
> on 64-bit host?)
>
I've tri
On 27/08/2010 20:53, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/27/10 3:26 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Can you try it with original clamav 32-bit binary package?
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/clamav.tbz
(or can you build your own on real 32-bit system instead of 32-bit
On 8/27/10 5:03 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
> On 27/08/2010 20:53, Glen Barber wrote:
>> On 8/27/10 3:26 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> Can you try it with original clamav 32-bit binary package?
>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/clamav.tbz
>>>
>>>
>>> (or
28 matches
Mail list logo
