ap22-mod_auth_pam

2010-08-04 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. I've been using mod_auth_pam everywhere for years. Yet I cannot seem to get it to work on a 7.2/i386 box of mine. Here's what I get when I try to start it: httpd: Syntax error on line 104 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_auth_pam.so into

ipsec-tools fix broken in CURRENT

2010-08-04 Thread Michael Pounov
Hi, this patch file ipsec-tools_fbsd90.txt Fix broken ipsec-tools in freebsd 9.0-current. Because after change syscons stop compiling sources. You can access the state of your problem report at any time via this link: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149270 >Category: ports >Res

ipsec-tools fix broken in CURRENT

2010-08-04 Thread Michael Pounov
Hi, this patch file ipsec-tools_fbsd90.txt Fix broken ipsec-tools in freebsd 9.0-current. Because after change syscons stop compiling sources. You can access the state of your problem report at any time via this link: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149270 >Category: ports >Res

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-04 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: >>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement ove

Re: ap22-mod_auth_pam

2010-08-04 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/10 10:48, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > I've been using mod_auth_pam everywhere for years. > Yet I cannot seem to get it to work on a 7.2/i386 box of mine. > > Here's what I get when I try to start it: > > httpd: Syntax error on line 10

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-04 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just for the sheer sake of saying it since its the least I can do for this, I would like to say thanks to the gecko team for all the nice work. Having email with a nice project integrated like lightning means a world of difference for a lot of people

:${foo_enable:=NO} in rc.d script

2010-08-04 Thread Hiroki Sato
Hi, This may be discussed already but I could not find which was correct, so please point out it if we already have a consensus... Well, I am wondering if an rc.d script installed by a port must have ": ${foo_enable:=NO}" line. An example in the porter's handbook includes this, and I can un

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-04 Thread Jimmie James
On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a significant improvement over 3.0.x, so I'd like to run the native version and get out

Re: :${foo_enable:=NO} in rc.d script

2010-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/04/10 20:25, Hiroki Sato wrote: Hi, This may be discussed already but I could not find which was correct, so please point out it if we already have a consensus... Well, I am wondering if an rc.d script installed by a port must have ": ${foo_enable:=NO}" line. That particular sty

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-04 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/04/10 08:12, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > On 03.08.2010 20:52, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 08/03/10 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >>> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: > Just curious about the status