Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
Regards
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a b
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
>> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
>> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
>
> I've seen kdelibs fail on
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x amd64 8.1-RC2, breaking build of
graphics/
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 03:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
>
> Regards
I did install Arch Linux on my w
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
> >> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
> >> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present)
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 11:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
It already started
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2010-July/008931.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
>> other mirrors:
>>
> ...
>>
>> yet it does not have those packages.
>>
>> How could something like this happen ?
>
> By being examined while a resync
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:15:42 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>
> Yeah that was it, but it is really, really bad. Mirroring must be atomic
> (mirror to temporary directory then rename). Otherwise there is a large
> window of time every couple of days when upgrading packages will at best
> fail or le
> Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
That could double disc requirement, & reduce mirror sites willing
to provide space ?
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Mail plain text. Not HTML, Not quo
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
>
> That could double disc requirement, & reduce mirror sites willing to
> provide space ?
>
Indeed it would. But there is no other way to solve it.
Alternative
I can no longer maintain the following ports:
* multimedia/abby
* multimedia/cclive
* multimedia/clive
* multimedia/clive-utils
* multimedia/quvi
* multimedia/umph
Perhaps someone reading this list could take them over.
clive-utils could be removed from the collection, altogether.
Th
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Toni Gundogdu wrote:
> I can no longer maintain the following ports:
>
> * multimedia/abby
> * multimedia/cclive
> * multimedia/clive
> * multimedia/clive-utils
> * multimedia/quvi
> * multimedia/umph
>
> Perhaps someone reading this list could take them over
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:01:19PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Toni Gundogdu wrote:
> > I can no longer maintain the following ports:
> >
> > ?* multimedia/abby
> > ?* multimedia/cclive
> > ?* multimedia/clive
> > ?* multimedia/clive-utils
> > ?* multimedia/quvi
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> >> Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
> >
> > That could double disc requirement, & reduce mirror sites willing to
> > provide space ?
>
> Indeed it would. But there is no
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
>
>> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>> At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
>>> other mirrors:
>>>
>> ...
>>>
>>> yet it does not have those packages.
>>>
>>> How could something
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
>>
>>> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
>>> ...
>>>
On Monday 26 July 2010 22:05:06 Thomas Zander wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> recently an update to x264 version 98 has been committed to the ports
> tree. I now have prepared an mplayer snapshot that requires it :-)
> You can find a tarball containing mplayer and mencoder ports at:
> http://www.rrr.de/~ri
Hi
Build failure in portupgrade of gnome-terminal
Thanks in advance for any information on how to fix this one
David
Extract from scripted console output:
terminal-util.c: In function 'terminal_util_array_to_strv':
terminal-util.c:624: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: executing libtool commands
===> Building for
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:11:25 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively it could be prevented with no disk cost by putting
>> "MIRROR-IN-PROGRESS" file and making all package utilities check for
>> its existence and fail with explanation to try again later.
>
> P
28.07.2010 20:53, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
Build failure in portupgrade of gnome-terminal
Thanks in advance for any information on how to fix this one
David
Extract from scripted console output:
/usr/local/lib/libICE.so -lutil -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-
rpath -Wl,/usr/lo
> David Southwell writes:
> > [ 72%] Building CXX object
> > src/highgui/CMakeFiles/highgui.dir/grfmt_imageio.o [ 72%] Building CXX
> > object src/highgui/CMakeFiles/highgui.dir/grfmt_pxm.o Linking CXX shared
> > library ../../lib/libhighgui.so
> > [ 73%] Built target highgui
> > [ 73%] Generating
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: exe
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
David
config.status: ex
On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
>>>
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> At this very moment, french package mirror has INDE
> 28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> > 28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> >> take a
> >> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> >> Is all the code in that script strict enough for py
On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to take
> a
> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
No, that script contains syntax that doesn't work wi
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> > take a look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
> > Is all the code in that script strict enough for python 3.
>
> No, that script contains syntax that doesn't
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
Is all the code in that script strict enou
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> In that case should the port not call for 26?
>
> Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is installed
> on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call for it as a
> dependency rather than failing bec
> 28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
> >> 28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> >>> 28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
> Hi
>
> This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
> take a
> look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:13 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > In that case should the port not call for 26?
> >
> > Here is an extract from my pkgdb from which you can see python26 is
> > installed on the system. If the port needs 26 surely should it not call
> > for it as a dependency rather than fa
28.07.2010 22:26, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 22:05, David Southwell пишет:
28.07.2010 21:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
28.07.2010 21:00, David Southwell пишет:
Hi
This is a python error. Is anyone sufficiently familiar with python to
take a
look at tools/glib-signals-marshall-gen.py.
On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:28 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> I believe the porters handbook recomends that ports should set the
> appropriate
> python environment at build time to prevent this problem occuring.
Sure, modulo that setting USE_PYTHON isn't going to change the default Python
which gets r
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:13:56 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0?
> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because
> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present).
>
> Regards
>
Port for k3b-2.0.0 is availa
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:40 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>
>> I think you could also detect inconsistent mirror by comparing
>> modification time of package against mtime of INDEX. If pkg is newer
>> than INDEX then it's a sign of incomplete sync.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:39, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
>>
>>> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
>>> ...
On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:39, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
>>>
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX new
On 28/07/2010 23:36, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:40 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you could also detect inconsistent mirror by comparing
>>> modification time of package against mtime of INDEX. If pkg is newer
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:18:01 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>>
>> Excuse me? The ports check downloaded source tarball against SHA
>> checksum. Just for nay case like downloading error or malicious
>> inject. Did you try to say that binary package
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:23:58 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 23:36, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by master ? If you think about ftp-master then it's
>> password protected. AFAIK there is no publicly available ftp site that
>> is an authoritative source, ftp.freebsd.
These are the results that I get on my home machine:
$ make index
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for
:/home/pcvs/ports/lang
make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for :/home/pcvs/ports/lang
make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for :/home/pcvs/p
Its a bit to late for me to think about this tonight, but on quick
glance our diffs not equivalent.
On 7/29/2010 12:14 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> These are the results that I get on my home machine:
>
> $ make index
> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry
On 29/07/2010 01:29, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:18:01 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Excuse me? The ports check downloaded source tarball against SHA
>>> checksum. Just for nay case like downloading error or malicious
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mark Linimon wrote:
These are the results that I get on my home machine:
--
Here is my /etc/make.conf:
OPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes
WITH_APACHE2=yes
X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
USE_LOCAL_MK= yes
Thi
46 matches
Mail list logo
