On 14.07.2010 07:57 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
I am afraid your newest patch is not working for me. This is on
9.0-CURRENT amd64.
Obviously there went something wrong with the intime generated (faked)
plist:
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/vlc-1.1.0'
/bin/rm -f
/
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:45:34PM -0400, Joseph S. Atkinson wrote:
> > On 07/12/2010 20:24, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:42:46PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
> > >> 2010/7/12 David Southwell:
> > >>> cd: can't cd to
> > >>> /usr/ports/multimedia/vlc/work/fake/usr/local/
On 07/14/2010 04:20, David Southwell wrote:
> his morning I was just going to test your patch when I saw you had committed
> the patch. I updated my ports and tested the result - which now produces a
> different error.
>
...
> Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "fi")
> *** Error c
Request received for list 'nikosoft' via request address.
>> The original message was received at Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:26:38 +0200
Unknown command.
>> from freebsd.org [75.151.3.79]
Unknown command.
>> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
Unknown command.
>>
Unknown co
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
> On 07/14/2010 04:20, David Southwell wrote:
> > his morning I was just going to test your patch when I saw you had
> > committed the patch. I updated my ports and tested the result - which
> > now produces a different error.
>
> ...
>
> > Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "fi")
>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:57:24AM -0400, Joseph S. Atkinson wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 04:20, David Southwell wrote:
> > his morning I was just going to test your patch when I saw you had
> > committed
> > the patch. I updated my ports and tested the result - which now produces a
> > different err
2010/6/28 Anonymous :
> Anonymous writes:
>
> I've filed ports/148196.
>
> However, I think there should be a way to prepend search paths in
> /etc/rc.d/ldconfig despite possible footshooting. Using libmap.conf
> as described in custom-gcc article looks ugly to me.
>
Folks,
I've just returned fr
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:01:18 -0500, Frank A. Greco
wrote:
HI,
I'm running 8.0-RELEASE, amd64. The port installs fine as a package but
when I try to run gimp I get an error message that gegl 0.1.2 needs to
be updated to gegl 0.0.18. The description of the port says that gegl
0.1.2 is re
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:57:24AM -0400, Joseph S. Atkinson wrote:
> > On 07/14/2010 04:20, David Southwell wrote:
> > > his morning I was just going to test your patch when I saw you had
> > > committed the patch. I updated my ports and tested the result - which
> > > now produces a different
Sahil Tandon wrote:
[mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d]
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon :
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I
saw this port I just didn't u
2010/7/14 Jim Pazarena :
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>
>> [mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d]
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon :
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pazarena wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> [mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d]
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon :
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> Yes someti
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Jim Pazarena wrote:
my own ports confusion (in general) is that in some ports
you use a "-Dxx" to define a required (or not required) option
while in others (at least dspam) you use WITHOUT_xxx or WITH_xxx=1.
It would be nice if all ports has the same standard of definit
This morning I tried to build and install a port, math/emc2 and received
an error message saying there was a size mismatch. As I understand it,
this means the upstream source package is now a different size than it
was when the emc2 port was created. If I understand correctly, this
usually happens
Hello all,
A few of you have asked me about patch of linux-opera update to 10.60.
Here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mezz/diff/linux-opera1060.diff
The flash plugin 10.1 has an issue of sometimes the mouse click does not
work. I am not sure if it's Opera 10.60 or flash plugin 10.1 issue as I
*** Makefile.orig Wed Jul 14 14:54:22 2010
--- Makefile Wed Jul 14 15:04:32 2010
***
*** 6,13
#
PORTNAME= bochs
! PORTVERSION= 2.4
! PORTEPOCH= 2
CATEGORIES= emulators
MASTER_SITES= SF
--- 6,13
#
PORTNAME= bochs
! PORTVERSION= 2.4.5
! #PORTEPOCH= 2
CATE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Wallace wrote:
>
> *** Makefile.orig Wed Jul 14 14:54:22 2010
> --- Makefile Wed Jul 14 15:04:32 2010
> ***
> *** 6,13
> #
>
> PORTNAME= bochs
> ! PORTVERSION=2.4
> ! PORTEPOCH= 2
> CATEGORIES= emulator
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jesse Smith wrote:
> This morning I tried to build and install a port, math/emc2 and received
> an error message saying there was a size mismatch. As I understand it,
> this means the upstream source package is now a different size than it
> was when the emc2 port
19 matches
Mail list logo
