Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and after
an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated from
lighttpd-1.4.26 to lighttpd-1.4.26_1 I receive this error when trying to
start lighttpd:
2010-05-27 09:34:56: (network.c.529) SSL:
error::lib(0):fun
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:39:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and
> after an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated
> from lighttpd-1.4.26 to lighttpd-1.4.26_1 I receive this error when
> trying to start lighttpd:
>
>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:29:19AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:39:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and
> > after an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated
> > from lighttpd-1.4.26 to lig
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:29:19AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:39:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and
> > after an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated
> > from lighttpd-1.4.26 to lig
On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:35:02 +0200
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> > > >Hello list!
> > > >
> > > >There seems to be a known/fixed
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:38:08AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:29:19AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:39:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and
> > > after an update of the po
Hi!
I submitted the PR in the subject a while ago. It's still there.
I also wrote directly to the maintainer a few weeks before submitting
the PR without an answer.
I know the port committers have a lot of work to do, but I'd just like
to ask if someone could have a look at this PR before the po
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
Hello list!
There seems to be a known/fixed bug in new xserver that leads to
(many|all?) motif-based applications to ma
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:35:02 +0200
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
Hello list!
There seems to be a known/fixed bug in new xser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/27/10 00:39, O. Hartmann wrote:
> (network.c.529) SSL: error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0)
http://redmine.lighttpd.net/attachments/1095/08-ssl-retval-fix.patch
or wait for version 1.4.27 or 1.4.28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
Am 26.05.2010 22:24, schrieb Jerry:
> I inquired about it a month or so ago. Other posters replied favorable
> regarding it. However, since there is a dearth of drivers for any of the
> newer chip sets that support the 'N' wireless protocol, it might well
> be of limited usefulness.
Porting Netwo
Good day there!
Since gnome update i have two very unpleasantly problems that i wasn't
able to solve by myself. So it would be great if you can point me in
right direction.
Problem #1. Nautilus and samba passworded shares.
When i'm trying to access any samba share that requires authentication,
Good day there!
Since gnome update i have two very unpleasantly problems that i wasn't
able to solve by myself. So it would be great if you can point me in
right direction.
Problem #1. Nautilus and samba passworded shares.
When i'm trying to access any samba share that requires authentication,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:02:06PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I submitted the PR in the subject a while ago. It's still there.
>
> I also wrote directly to the maintainer a few weeks before submitting
> the PR without an answer.
>
> I know the port committers have a lot of work to do, b
Hi freebsd-ports@,
Since slim do not use login(1) to log your user in, everything set in
/etc/login.conf won't be present on your session. If you did set some
settings they won't appear.
in the /usr/local/etc/slim.conf you can see :
login_cmd exec /bin/sh - ~/.xinitrc %session
As desc
On 05/27/10 18:30, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:02:06PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
Hi!
I submitted the PR in the subject a while ago. It's still there.
I also wrote directly to the maintainer a few weeks before submitting
the PR without an answer.
I know the port committers
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> I think you can remove PORTEPOCH in the patch.
You can never, ever turn back PORTEPOCH.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server
> to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far.
> Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7?
Alas, this does not address the problem with mwm(1).
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:33:12PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
>
> > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server
> > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far.
> > Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7?
>
> Ala
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:17:28PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:33:12PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> >
> > > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server
> > > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far.
> >
On 27/05/2010 08:39, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and after
> an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated from
> lighttpd-1.4.26 to lighttpd-1.4.26_1 I receive this error when trying
> to start lighttpd:
>
> 2010-05-27 09:34:56:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:19:50 +0200
Matthias Andree articulated:
> Am 26.05.2010 22:24, schrieb Jerry:
>
> > I inquired about it a month or so ago. Other posters replied
> > favorable regarding it. However, since there is a dearth of drivers
> > for any of the newer chip sets that support the 'N
editors/cooledit, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
preparing
Am 22.05.2010 um 19:08 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating the net/netatalk port from 2.0.5 to 2.1. You can
> find the most current version of my work at
> http://www.lassitu.de/freebsd/netatalk/
>
> Initial testing looks promising. There's one outstanding issue: upgradi
24 matches
Mail list logo