On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:21:35 -0400
jhell wrote:
> You being the originator of the thread called "Users and groups kept
> after a port deinstallation" which implies to me that you had a
> problem with users left behind on a system am I correct ?
No, and the OP and I have different names and emai
On Sun, 23 May 2010 07:57:36 +0400
Anonymous wrote:
> > You don't have to remember, just look at the UID/GID values,
> > ordinary users start at 1001, ports create UIDs < 1000.
>
> You're presuming non-ordinary users are created only by ports
> framework. That's not always the case. I may want
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:30:20PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:09:01PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > > > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:49:06AM +, Helmut Schn
It has been several months now since Firefox-3.6.3 was released into
the ports system. Has a viable version of Java been created to work
with this version of Firefox? I am unable to locate any information in
regards to this on the FreeBSD web page.
--
Jerry
freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net
Discl
Warren,
> > If this is the wrong place, please be gentle! I need
> to get a Canon 8800F scanner running on FreeBSD 7.2 .
> SANE's latest version is said to support this scanner.
>
> sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this morning...
I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupg
Warren,
> > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this
> morning...
>
> I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupgrade
> and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even though the
> INDEX-7 file indicates that the sane-backend version is
> 1.0.21 I keep getting 1.0.20 downloaded.
Mark Terribile writes:
> Warren,
>
>> > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this
>> morning...
>>
>> I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupgrade
>> and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even though the
>> INDEX-7 file indicates that the sane-backend version is
>> 1.0.21 I
Lowell,
--- On Sun, 5/23/10, Lowell Gilbert > >
Warren,
> >
> >> > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this
> >> morning...
> >>
> >> I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried
> portupgrade
> >> and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even
> though the
> >> INDEX-7 file indicates t
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Mark Terribile wrote:
sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this morning...
I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupgrade and pkgdb
-FU followed by portupgrade and even though the INDEX-7 file indicates
that the sane-backend version is 1.0.21 I keep getti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 2010 02:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
In Message-Id: <4bf8c4f8.9090...@infracaninophile.co.uk>
On 23/05/2010 04:47:49, jhell wrote:
But if a port can install a user there is no reason that it can not
uninstall a user via pw(8) that is
Hi--
On May 22, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> OpenBSD has a convention that all system user accounts start with a '_'
> character. There are a few accounts in UIDs that have adopted that, but
> no great stampede to adopt the idea despite most people agreeing with it.
That convention
On 05/23/10 09:24, jhell wrote:
That shouldn't actually be to hard. If a utility like the three main
upgrade tools that are being used the most right now would export a
variable for say "UPGRADING=yes" then the uninstall script could check
against that to decide whether or not the port is being
audio/xmms-infopipe, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
preparin
Thanks to help from Warren Block and Lowell Gilbert, I now have the offical
ported version of sane-backends-1.0.21 running. Unfortunately, it's behaving
the same way as before, apparently not properly recognizing the USB device. It
Does anyone have experience using this? Or better yet, some
Hello here,
I am a new freebsd user and would like to know how to install port from link
below:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/nav/
There are not much info on howto for this particular package.
Any help or guide would be appreciated.
M
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, madal 30 wrote:
>
> Hello here,
>
> I am a new freebsd user and would like to know how to install port from link
> below:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/nav/
>
> There are not much info on howto for this particular package.
>
> Any help o
Greetings again. A few years ago, I proposed editors/emacs-nox11 and submitted
a patch to create it, and thus became listed in the comments at the beginning
of the Makefile (but I am not the package maintainer, I believe). Today I got a
report that the package does not build; I verified this. I
Hello,
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. A few years ago, I proposed editors/emacs-nox11 and
> submitted a patch to create it, and thus became listed in the comments at the
> beginning of the Makefile (but I am not the package maintainer, I believe).
> Tod
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 04:46:46PM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. A few years ago, I proposed editors/emacs-nox11 and
> submitted a patch to create it, and thus became listed in the comments at the
> beginning of the Makefile (but I am not the package maintainer, I believe).
> Tod
Hi!
After all of updtaes I have a little problem with GIMP:
on the image window doesn't show anymore pointer coordinates, units and zoom.
It show just Background...
I have FreeBSD 8.0 p2, KDE 4.4.3.
If I start GIMP from Konsole I got:
gimp
** Message: Module '/usr/local/lib/gegl-0.1/ff-load.so' l
On Sun 23 May 2010 at 17:05:04 PDT Julien Laffaye wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. A few years ago, I proposed editors/emacs-nox11 and submitted
a patch to create it, and thus became listed in the comments at the beginning
of the Makefile (b
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Eitan Adler wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll definitely consider that for the next
version. I already have problems with the documentation being long and
detailed, whether it is too much of either is sort of in the eye of the
beholder. :)
Detailed documentation is al
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 08:02:19AM -0400, jhell wrote:
> Attached is the copy of the sudoers.default take a look through it to
> see how to set a environment variable for use with portupgrade or
> portmaster etc...
Hmm. I see that that is now the installed default, but of
course (by design) the f
Hi,
x11/kdebase4-runtime doesn't in pull security/libssh as dependency if we
have misc/compat7x installed (installs libssh.so.4 as well, in different
location). Detection of security/libssh could be changed to
${LOCALBASE}/include/libssh/libssh.h. Patch attached.
Thanks,
Yuri
Index: Makefile
===
On May 23, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Indi wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 03:40:47PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:25 PM, madal 30 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello here,
>>>
>>> I am a new freebsd user and would like to know how to install port from
>>> link below:
>>>
>>> http://www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/05/2010 02:07:24, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Sun 23 May 2010 at 17:05:04 PDT Julien Laffaye wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Paul Hoffman
>> wrote:
>>> Greetings again. A few years ago, I proposed editors/emacs-nox11 and
>
Hi Andrew and All,
On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:52:37 +1000 Andrew Reilly wrote:
> I haven't changed my configuration recently, but I've noticed
> that sudo processes have stopped inheriting my environment
> variables like MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX and PORTSDIR. I read the man
> page, and tried sudo -E, and th
27 matches
Mail list logo
