On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:29:22AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> a little confusion arised from ports/146627.
>
> The Porter's Handbook defines PREFIX as the place where port should
> install its files including config files. However, it doesn't say where
> the port should try to read its config files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/05/2010 12:56:11, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:29:22AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
>> a little confusion arised from ports/146627.
>>
>> The Porter's Handbook defines PREFIX as the place where port should
>> install its files in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 May 2010 13:13:36 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 18/05/2010 12:56:11, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:29:22AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> >> a little confusion arise
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> The next wave of the challenge, fear, there is one more already
> composed to be released with 8.1!
>
> --
>
> Give Freeze a chance
> with apologies to John Lennon et al
>
> Ev'rybody's talkin' 'bout
> portism, srcism, docism, cvsism, svni
Anyone cares to comment/act on this?
on 21/03/2010 13:56 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> There is the following snippet in mail/moztraybiff/Makefile:
>
> .if !exists(../thunderbird/Makefile)
> BROKEN= ${PORTNAME} needs the Thunderbird port in order to build
> .else
> TBVER!= c
Matthew Seaman writes:
> On 18/05/2010 12:56:11, Wesley Shields wrote:
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:29:22AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
>>> a little confusion arised from ports/146627.
>>>
>>> The Porter's Handbook defines PREFIX as the place where port should
>>> install its files including config
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:50:07PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> Matthew Seaman writes:
>
> > On 18/05/2010 12:56:11, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:29:22AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> >>> a little confusion arised from ports/146627.
> >>>
> >>> The Porter's Handbook defines PREF
On 5/18/2010 12:57 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:50:07PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
>
>> This still doesn't clarify where to look for files that are *not*
>> installed, e.g. config files. Such files can be created by user and only
>> used by the port itself when they exist. Do
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:21:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 5/18/2010 12:57 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:50:07PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> >
> >> This still doesn't clarify where to look for files that are *not*
> >> installed, e.g. config files. Such files can be
Wesley Shields writes:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:21:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> In the world where PREFIX and LOCALBASE are different, PREFIX cannot be
>> relied on to exist after the port is installed. Therefore regarding
>> configuration files that are not installed by the port the thi
On 5/18/2010 2:57 PM, Anonymous wrote:
> Wesley Shields writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:21:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> In the world where PREFIX and LOCALBASE are different, PREFIX cannot be
>>> relied on to exist after the port is installed. Therefore regarding
>>> configuration f
Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following to the
list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3)?
math/ised
misc/xsw
sysutils/rdup
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Doug Barton writes:
> On 5/18/2010 2:57 PM, Anonymous wrote:
>> Wesley Shields writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 01:21:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
In the world where PREFIX and LOCALBASE are different, PREFIX cannot be
relied on to exist after the port is installed. Therefore
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:41, Charlie Kester wrote:
> Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following to
> the
> list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3)?
>
> math/ised misc/xsw sysutils/rdup
Done, thanks for reporting.
On 19 May 2010 10:49, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:41, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following to
>> the
>> list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndGPLv3)?
>>
>> math/ised misc/xsw
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:05 PM, David N wrote:
> On 19 May 2010 10:49, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 00:41, Charlie Kester wrote:
>>> Will someone with edit privileges for the wiki please add the following to
>>> the
>>> list of GPLv3-licensed ports (http://wiki.freebsd.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martin,
On 05/13/2010 11:38 AM, Martin Turgeon wrote:
> Le 2010-05-11 18:36, Janky Jay, III a écrit :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi Darrell,
>>
>> Darrell Betts wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Jay,
>>>
>>> I have been in contact
To whom it may concern:
I would like to request a port of TrueCrypt. TrueCrypt 6.3a was the
last stable version. The official website url is
http://www.truecrypt.org/
I appreciate your time and consideration in this matter.
--
The content of this email and any attachment may contain proprie
Hi list,
I would like to know if there is a way to tell a port that it depend
on an other port
but build with particulars options.
Eg : port foo build depend on bar but won't build if bar is not build
with WITH_PARTICULAR.
I don't see anything to say that in bsd.port.mk, so before to
implement
19 matches
Mail list logo
