On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:26:03PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> > This is wrong, FreeBSD has native 64-bit stat() etc. and does not need
> > _LARGEFILE_WHATEVER.
>
> Yes we do not need that and it just cause compilation errors.
>
> The problem is that some third party software thinks that they need to
It seems to stop with mozilla. All ports are up to date. This is the
only one that won't build for us on 7.3.
c++ -o nsHtml5NamedCharacters.o -c -I../../dist/system_wrappers
-include ../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API
-D_IMPL_NS_COM -DEXPORT_XPT_API -DEXPORT_XPTC_API
-D_IMPL
On 3/27/10 2:46 PM, eculp wrote:
> It seems to stop with mozilla. All ports are up to date. This is the
> only one that won't build for us on 7.3.
>
> c++ -o nsHtml5NamedCharacters.o -c -I../../dist/system_wrappers -include
> ../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_IMPL_NS_COM
> -DEXPO
Hi,
I was wondering why LyX in the FreeBSD ports isn't upgraded anymore. The
current version in ports is still 1.5.7, but the latest LyX version is
1.6.5. The version in ports is 1,5 years old.
Regards,
Marco
--
In every hierarchy the cream rises until it sours.
-- Dr. Laure
Le Saturday 27 Mar 2010 à 17:32:42 (+0100), Marco Beishuizen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering why LyX in the FreeBSD ports isn't upgraded anymore. The
> current version in ports is still 1.5.7, but the latest LyX version is
> 1.6.5. The version in ports is 1,5 years old.
>
Probably because n
On Sat 27 Mar 2010 at 09:34:54 PDT Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Le Saturday 27 Mar 2010 à 17:32:42 (+0100), Marco Beishuizen a écrit :
Hi,
I was wondering why LyX in the FreeBSD ports isn't upgraded anymore. The
current version in ports is still 1.5.7, but the latest LyX version is
1.6.5. The vers
Quoting Florian Smeets :
On 3/27/10 2:46 PM, eculp wrote:
It seems to stop with mozilla. All ports are up to date. This is the
only one that won't build for us on 7.3.
c++ -o nsHtml5NamedCharacters.o -c -I../../dist/system_wrappers -include
../../config/gcc_hidden.h -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -D_I
On 03/27/10 21:49, eculp wrote:
Quoting daniele :
HI !
do you get any system message similar to "swap_pager_getswapspace(2):
failed" ?
d
Hi Daniele,
I just greped the log files on both machines for swap and found nothing.
I'm going to keep looking at swap and memory.
Thanks,
ed
On 03/2
This is the error I'm getting (both with cvsup8 and cvsup.freebsd.org)
Connecting to cvsup.FreeBSD.org
Connected to 72.233.193.64
Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
Negotiating file attribute support
Exchanging collection information
Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection
Running
Updating
The error:
# Parsing supfile "/etc/cvsupfile"
Connecting to cvsup.FreeBSD.org
Connected to 72.233.193.64
Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
Negotiating file attribute support
Exchanging collection information
Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection
Running
Updating collection ports-all/cv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 03/27/10 14:50, Tim Kellers wrote:
> This is the error I'm getting (both with cvsup8 and cvsup.freebsd.org)
>
> Connecting to cvsup.FreeBSD.org
> Connected to 72.233.193.64
> Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
> Negotiating file attribute sup
Doug Barton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 03/27/10 14:50, Tim Kellers wrote:
This is the error I'm getting (both with cvsup8 and cvsup.freebsd.org)
Connecting to cvsup.FreeBSD.org
Connected to 72.233.193.64
Server software version: SNAP_16_1h
Negotiating file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 03/27/10 16:02, Tim Kellers wrote:
> Thanks. rm -rf ports/audio/aureal-kmod/ did the trick
If that's true you probably have other errors that you don't know about.
Make sure you run csup without the -s option on a regular basis to make
sure t
Doug Barton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 03/27/10 16:02, Tim Kellers wrote:
Thanks. rm -rf ports/audio/aureal-kmod/ did the trick
If that's true you probably have other errors that you don't know about.
Make sure you run csup without the -s option on a
Hi,
As part of taking a look at the differences in our implementation
of pkg_install(1) in order to afford an improvement over the existing
code, I've looked at various implementations of pkg_install, one being
NetBSD's evolution [1]. It's several years ahead from our's and while
I don't believ
The Restless Daemon identified a nested_declaration error while trying to build:
upclient-5.0.b8_5 maintained by po...@freebsd.org
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/misc/upclient/Makefile,v 1.36 2010/03/28
06:25:22 dougb Exp $
Excerpt from http://QAT.TecNik93.com/logs/8-STABLE-NPD/upclient-5.0.b8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Howdy,
As should be obvious by now I'm following through on my previously
stated plans to remove the no longer necessary %%RC_SUBR%% and
%%RC_SUBR_SUFFIX%% from the ports tree. In a few cases where
substitutions for the former are still necessary
17 matches
Mail list logo