Hi,
Works here too !
I'm running FreeBSD current amd64, with nouveau driver.
I just need to recompile x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau because of the
following error :
(EE) module ABI major version (5) doesn't match the server's version (6)
Is it possible to bump the portrevision for this port ?
I
x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd (1.3.0_1) attempts to reinstall already
installed devel/libpci when WITH_UTILS is set.
I see this in the port's Makefile:
LIB_DEPENDS+= pci.3:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libpci
But I see this in the system:
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 44927 11 Mar 10:14 /usr/local/lib/libp
Hi,
This might just be a heads up for other people who haven't upgraded this
port yet but my
sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.14.4 < needs updating (port has 8.14.4_1)
led to a unstartable sendmail with:
sendmail in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense
I just used portdowngrade to go ba
on 12/03/2010 11:59 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd (1.3.0_1) attempts to reinstall already
> installed devel/libpci when WITH_UTILS is set.
>
> I see this in the port's Makefile:
> LIB_DEPENDS+= pci.3:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libpci
>
> But I see this in the system:
Hi,
This might just be a heads up for other people who haven't upgraded this
port yet but my
sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.14.4 < needs updating (port has 8.14.4_1)
led to a unstartable sendmail with:
sendmail in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense
I just used portdowngrade to go bac
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:48 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Call for Testing Xorg 7.5
> >
>
> Works here too.
> For some reason, Xfce doesn't work after the upgrade, xf
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 08:55 +0100, Miki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Works here too !
> I'm running FreeBSD current amd64, with nouveau driver.
> I just need to recompile x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau because of the
> following error :
> (EE) module ABI major version (5) doesn't match the server's version (6
I've just updated fsvs port to the latest fsvs version. As usual, no
warranties.
New fsvs port may be found at http://sfedu.ru/~alp/other/fsvs122.tar.bz2 .
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Computer Center of South Federal University
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega
wrote:
> Hello Diego,
>
> On 12/03/2010, at 00:48, Diego Schulz wrote:
>
>> My main reason for updating from 0.99.38 to 0.99.43 was an extrange
>> behavior: cherokee daemon doesn't respond to TERM signals sent with
>> kill(1) (or whatever comm
On 12/03/2010, at 13:30, Diego Schulz wrote:
>>> Bad news is that the problem persists in 0.99.43.
>>> Cherokee 0.99.43 doesn't show this problem running on linux (debian).
>>
>> Could you please log a bug for it?
>> http://bugs.cherokee-project.com/new
>
> Done, issue #170.
>
>> It's kind of
> Just finished compiling on my desktop with no issues.
>
> FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64, KDE 4.4.1, nvidia binary driver.
>
> The update was smooth so i am compiling 7.5 on my laptop too, i will
> test it with both intel and radeon.
>
> Thank you very much for your work!
>
> Regards.
I am using the l
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:15:38 +0300
Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
AP> I've just updated fsvs port to the latest fsvs version. As usual,
AP> no warranties.
AP> New fsvs port may be found at
AP> http://sfedu.ru/~alp/other/fsvs122.tar.bz2 .
may be better way - fill pr with subject [NEW PORT] devel/fsvs ?
Hi,
I installed the nxserver and freenx ports on FreeBSD 8.0, but I'm
having the problem that any changes I make in
/usr/local/NX/etc/nxserver/node.conf are ignored.
Here are more details:
After installing the ports and running nxsetup --install (output
below), the setup fails because sshd is ru
On 12/03/2010 10:55, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi,
This might just be a heads up for other people who haven't upgraded
this port yet but my
sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.14.4 < needs updating (port has 8.14.4_1)
led to a unstartable sendmail with:
sendmail in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to mak
Hi,
I don't know if it is a problem but I also found out that the install
does not create a cherokee user on freebsd and that cherokee is running
as root default on freebsd...
Security wise it does not sound as a good idea to let it run as root ;)
(I know I can change it manually but it would
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Michiel van Es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if it is a problem but I also found out that the install does
> not create a cherokee user on freebsd and that cherokee is running as root
> default on freebsd...
Yes, I noticed that too. I also changed the user manuall
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee Web Server version in ports tree
From: Diego Schulz
To: Michiel van Es
Date: 03/12/2010 02:33 PM
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Michiel van Es wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if it is a problem but I also found out that the ins
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michiel van Es wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee Web Server version in ports tree
> From: Diego Schulz
> To: Michiel van Es
> Date: 03/12/2010 02:33 PM
>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Michiel van Es
>> wrot
I wait for the updated port :)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee Web Server version in ports tree
From: Diego Schulz
To: Michiel van Es
Date: 03/12/2010 02:52 PM
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michiel van Es wrote:
Original Message
Su
I don't know if I should also cc the maintainer for FF3.6, but I'm
posting here. Hopefully they'll see it.
When will we have an updated Java for use in Firefox 3.6? I guess I
could downgrade back to 3.5 if absolutely necessary, but I'd rather not.
Though I imagine an upgraded java would mean I wou
On Friday 12 March 2010 22:36:21 George Liaskos wrote:
> > Just finished compiling on my desktop with no issues.
> >
> > FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64, KDE 4.4.1, nvidia binary driver.
> >
> > The update was smooth so i am compiling 7.5 on my laptop too, i will
> > test it with both intel and radeon.
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:48 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Call for Testing Xorg 7.5
> >
>
> Works here too.
> For some reason, Xfce doesn't work after the upgrade, xf
Isn`t it time for FreeBSD to fully support Unicode/UTF-8 by now?
It is considered to be standard charset by now. XML uses it by default.
If you are working with texts in different languages there is no
alternative to UTF-8.
If you chat with a Linux machine you can easily run into charset
troubles i
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> Isn`t it time for FreeBSD to fully support Unicode/UTF-8 by now?
> It is considered to be standard charset by now. XML uses it by default.
> If you are working with texts in different languages there is no
> alternative to UTF-8.
> If yo
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> Did you recompile everything like the instructions state, or at
> the very least libxcb dependent pieces (cairo, et all)? Memory serves
> me correctly cairo and libxcb links into xfce4, and it turns into a
> nasty mess if the ABI mism
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Robert Noland wrote:
>
> Hrm... That presents an interesting issue... While I think we will need
> to get agp fixed up first, the 2.9.1 version of the driver may actually
> support your card. It will not have drm support, but it would be a much
> better sol
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Robert Noland wrote:
> Can you try the attached patch and verify that AGP attaches and reports
> correctly. I will try and see if I can enable drm on this chip with the
> current driver, or import version 2.9.1 of the driver this weekend. You
> won't get drm wit
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 20:10 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Robert Noland
> wrote:
> Can you try the attached patch and verify that AGP attaches
> and reports
> correctly. I will try and see if I can enable drm on this
> chi
On 12/03/2010 19:23, 葉佳威 Jiawei Ye wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>> Isn`t it time for FreeBSD to fully support Unicode/UTF-8 by now?
>> It is considered to be standard charset by now. XML uses it by default.
>> If you are working with texts in different langua
Update:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>>
>> Did you recompile everything like the instructions state, or at
>> the very least libxcb dependent pieces (cairo, et all)? Memory serves
>> me correctly cair
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Update:
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Did you recompile everything like the instructions state, or at
>>> the very least lib
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 23:07 +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Update:
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Did you recompile everything like the instructions state, or at
> >> the very
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 14:09 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > Update:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Did you
33 matches
Mail list logo
