On Mon, 01.03.2010 at 23:51:25 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
>
> Let me back up...
>
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported our mi
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:51 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
>
> Let me back up...
>
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported our mips supp
In message: <20100302120308.ga53...@elmar.spoerlein.net>
Ulrich Spörlein writes:
: On Mon, 01.03.2010 at 23:51:25 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > ... that builds part of FreeBSD?
: >
: > Let me back up...
: >
: > I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
:
Warner Losh wrote:
> I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils that is configured
> for FreeBSD for a given machine. FreeBSD mips, say. binutils was
> relatively easy (once I ported our mips support forward). However,
> gcc vexes me.
This is not an answer to your question, but a related
Doug Barton wrote:
> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.
> On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> >> On 24.02.2010 02:45, We
On 3/2/2010 4:44 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after
> you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not
> built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing !
I didn't "refuse" anything, I have no actual authority. :)
