During the recent massive port upgrades, I decided to uninstall net/samba3 and
install net/smb-smbclient as I need just the client component.
Now I've noticed that, every times I start smbclient, a file named
"smbclient.gmon" (about 2 mb), reported as "data" by file(1), is generated in
the CWD.
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
On 14/02/2010 09:27, barbara wrote:
> During the recent massive port upgrades, I decided to uninstall
> net/samba3 and install net/smb-smbclient as I need just the client
> component. Now I've noticed that, every times I start smbclient, a
> file named "smbclient.gmon" (about 2 mb), reported as "
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:27 AM, barbara wrote:
> During the recent massive port upgrades, I decided to uninstall net/samba3
> and install net/smb-smbclient as I need just the client component.
> Now I've noticed that, every times I start smbclient, a file named
> "smbclient.gmon" (about 2 mb),
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:27 AM, barbara wrote:
> > During the recent massive port upgrades, I decided to uninstall net/samba3
> > and install net/smb-smbclient as I need just the client component.
> > Now I've noticed that, every times I start smbclient, a file named
> > "smbclient.gmon" (ab
Hi there,
since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD
port/finance/homebank-4.2"
see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2
===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2
===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1
=> homebank-4.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:26:39PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> I'm working on a revision to a port where the current version doesn't
> work on 8.0-R; however, an older version does. Rather than roll the
> entire port back to an older version, I'd like to have the newer version
> available to
Hi,
I updatet ports tree and try to update compiz fusion, but I got
this message:
compiz.Tpo -c compiz.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/compiz.o
compiz.cpp: In function 'void loadPluginsFromXMLFiles(CCSContext*, char*)':
compiz.cpp:2884: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(const dirent*)'
to '
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:54, barbara.xxx1975@ wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:27 AM, barbara wrote:
During the recent massive port upgrades, I decided to uninstall net/samba3 and
install net/smb-smbclient as I need just the client component.
Now I've noticed that, every times I start smbclie
On 14.02.2010 14:46, hanno Krusken wrote:
Hi there,
since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD
port/finance/homebank-4.2"
see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2
===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2
===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1
=>
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:47, rfarmer@ wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:08 AM, b. f. wrote:
In bsd.gcc.mk there is:
. if ${_USE_GCC} != 3.4
CFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${PREFIX}/lib/${_GCC_BUILD_DEPENDS}
LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${PREFIX}/lib/${_GCC_BUILD_DEPENDS}
. endif
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:26:39PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I'm working on a revision to a port where the current version doesn't
work on 8.0-R; however, an older version does. Rather than roll the
entire port back to an older version, I'd like to have the newer versi
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 07:36:33PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> In preparation for 7.3-RELEASE, the ports tree will be in feature freeze
> after release candidate 1 (RC1 )is released, currently planned for
> February 8.
For those wondering why the freeze hasn't taken effect yet, as the
freeze coi
On 02/14/10 03:46, hanno Krusken wrote:
Hi there,
since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD
port/finance/homebank-4.2"
see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2
Does anyone have the old distfile (the one corresponding to what's
currently in the po
hth,
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/
? work
Index: Makefile
==
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:26:39PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm working on a revision to a port where the current version doesn't
>>> work on 8.0-R; however, an older version does. Rather than roll t
Hi.
I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
==
Hi,
It is intentional, done by myself to fix a problem into the package.
Regards,
Max.
- Mail Original -
De: "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov"
À: homeb...@free.
On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi.
I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Vendor provided binaries are a fun ball of wax to deal with
because you need to have all dependencies come from the same generic
pool as the package [/ port] itself, as any
This sounds trivial, but it requires changes to pkg_add (for
fetching / installing a particula
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, b. f. wrote:
> I agree with you, and I meant to mention this to gerald@ earlier, but
> I forgot. The Ports system is not now well-equipped to deal with
> LOCALBASE != PREFIX for a lot of software, and most people don't do
> this, so the impact is limited, but it does break som
Hello Dimitry!
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * CeDeROM (tomek.ce...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I am trying to create a helper local port for testing RC1 version of a
>> program that will soon have stable port update. Unfortunately the
>> package is named "openocd-0.4.0-rc
I'm not on this mailing list but I read you message. Sorry for not replying
directly.
The problem is that a patch for libcompizconfig has been removed, but this
patch is still necessary on RELENG_7 and older RELENG_8.
I wrote to rnoland@ on Feb. 11 and he replayed that he will fix the port as
s
Hello world!
In a moments of hard testing just before a software release, releases
of a RC (Release Candidate) packages are done to alow some final
tests. I am wondering if it is convenient to create the devel port, to
allow better testing for non-freebsd-aware users. Would that be more
convenient
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, jhell wrote:
> Could this possibly be the cause of the samba3* and cups ports getting
> profiling enabled on them ? possibly others ?
I don't think the the use of ${PREFIX} versus ${LOCALBASE} can have
such an effect, and by default (and thus the vast majority of uses)
the tw
Doug,
I can't get to this tonight. Do you mind committing this for me please?
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert
FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
e**(i*pi)+1=0
In message <4b786894.7070...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME f
Hi all,
I'm currently trying to resolve an ongoing issue I have with printer-applet
refusing to run for me.
The output from running it on the command line is as follows.
% printer-applet
printer-applet(10724) KLocalePrivate::initEncoding: Cannot resolve system
encoding, defaulting to ISO 8859
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> We the FreeBSD KDE Team are happy to let you know KDE SC 4.4.0 was
> released few mins ago, and we're ready for a public test. Before
> you ask we don't want to put KDE 4.4.0 in the ports tree before
> FreeBSD 7.3 was released.
>
> What is new
On Monday 15 February 2010 16:19:51 Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > We the FreeBSD KDE Team are happy to let you know KDE SC 4.4.0 was
> > released few mins ago, and we're ready for a public test. Before
> > you ask we don't want to put KDE 4.4.0 in th
28 matches
Mail list logo
