Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the li

Re: firefox-3.5.7,1 crashing

2010-01-28 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:21:13 +0200 Peter Badenhorst wrote: > I have found a reproducible bug that causes Firefox to crash whenever I go > to this web page: http://www.myspace.com/forsupernaturalfans > Just a data point - this page works fine with firefox 3.6 from the ports tree. --- Gary Jenne

port security/openssh-portable fails to build

2010-01-28 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Hi, I see on http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=security&portname=openssh-portable that openssh-portable doesn't build anywhere, not just on my ia64 and sparc. cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat-sec

Re: firefox-3.5.7,1 crashing

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Badenhorst
I compiled and installed 3.6 in www/firefox3-devel and it crashed again. This is the output near the end, I compiled it with debug info: nsStringStats => mAllocCount: 26879 => mReallocCount: 6803 => mFreeCount: 16552 -- LEAKED 10327 !!! => mShareCount: 284

Re: Need help with new port math/ggobi

2010-01-28 Thread b. f.
Rainer Hurling wrote: >There are some obscurities I am struggling with: >1. The port needs libraries gtk2 and libxml2. >Is it ok how the port ensures they are installed? Just use USE_GNOME= gtk20 libxml2, rather than the LIB_DEPENDS line. > >2. A second make target has to create 'ggobirc'. >

Re: firefox-3.5.7,1 crashing

2010-01-28 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:27:07 +0200 Peter Badenhorst wrote: > I compiled and installed 3.6 in www/firefox3-devel and it crashed again. > This is the output near the end, I compiled it with debug info: > > nsStringStats > => mAllocCount: 26879 > => mReallocCount: 6803 > => mFre

Re: Need help with new port math/ggobi

2010-01-28 Thread b. f.
On 1/28/10, b. f. wrote: > Rainer Hurling wrote: > Don't write into /etc, except in special cases. Use ${PREFIX}/etc > instead. Also, do something like: > > post-install: > ${MKDIR} /etc/xdg/ggobi Obviously, I should have written the above line as: ${MKDIR} ${PREFIX}/etc/xdg/ggobi b.

Re: firefox-3.5.7,1 crashing

2010-01-28 Thread Peter Badenhorst
I installed the add-ons you mentioned but all they did was prevent me from using the flash plugin (although it didn't crash anymore). Flash is supposed to be enabled, it says so in its plugins page but none of the flash sites work, some cause Firefox to crash. I am using Opera now instead. The Free

Re: Need help with new port math/ggobi

2010-01-28 Thread Eitan Adler
> > 1. The port needs libraries gtk2 and libxml2. > Is it ok how the port ensures they are installed? > Ports has a predefined method of doing this: USE_GNOME= gtk20 libxml2 > 3. ggobi authors suggest to create /etc/xdg/ggobi/ for resource file. > A better place would be /usr/local/etc/xdg/gg

patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
When an update to a port is committed, it is likely to contain (a) lines like "Only in : " or (b) patches that are created against empty files using the "-N" option for diff. Cannot "patch" honor these cases? As a port maintainer, I have been caught quite a few times by committers

Re: Need help with new port math/ggobi

2010-01-28 Thread Rainer Hurling
Thank you very much, b.f. and Eitan Adler, for your competent help. On 28.01.2010 17:53 (UTC+1), b. f. wrote: Rainer Hurling wrote: 1. The port needs libraries gtk2 and libxml2. Is it ok how the port ensures they are installed? Just use USE_GNOME= gtk20 libxml2, rather than the LIB_DEPEND

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:46:16 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > When an update to a port is committed, it is likely to contain > > (a) lines like "Only in : " > > or (b) patches that are created against empty files using the "-N" > option for diff. > > Cannot "patch" honor these

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/01/28 11:46, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > When an update to a port is committed, it is likely to contain > > (a) lines like "Only in : " > > or (b) patches that are created against empty files using the "-N" > option for diff. >

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/28/10 11:46, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Cannot "patch" honor these cases? As a port maintainer, I have been caught quite a few times by committers not adding or removing files from the "files" directory in a port. Any time you send someone a patch for any reason that deletes an exis

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:16:43 -0800 Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2010/01/28 11:46, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > When an update to a port is committed, it is likely to contain > > > > (a) lines like "

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Charlie Kester
On Thu 28 Jan 2010 at 13:37:06 PST Doug Barton wrote: Any time you send someone a patch for any reason that deletes an existing file it is worthwhile to call the person's attention to this fact. When you submit a port/update that ADDS a file it is definitely worthwhile to mention this as wel

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Charlie Kester wrote: On Thu 28 Jan 2010 at 13:37:06 PST Doug Barton wrote: Any time you send someone a patch for any reason that deletes an existing file it is worthwhile to call the person's attention to this fact. When you submit a port/update that ADDS a file it is

Re: Need help from someone with boost fu + RELENG_6

2010-01-28 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/27/10 05:36, Alexander Churanov wrote: Doug, I was testing boost-1.41 against net-p2p/rblibtorrent before updating. The pointyhat status for rblibtorrent on FreeBSD 7 and 8 is green. This may indicate that the issue is a bug in GCC and should be fixed by adding USE_GCC=4.2+ to all ports th

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Alberto Villa
On 1/28/10, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Thu 28 Jan 2010 at 13:37:06 PST Doug Barton wrote: >>When you submit a port/update that ADDS a file it is definitely >>worthwhile to mention this as well. > > Good advice that should be added to the porter's handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/port

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Sevan / Venture37
I was pointed to ports-mgmt/porttools by pgollucci@, that takes care of listing additions & removals in the PR when you use the port submit command. Sevan / Venture37 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: new port dns/dns-audit review

2010-01-28 Thread Sevan / Venture37
On 27/01/2010 00:45, Mark Foster wrote: Not to dissuade you but this is what the dns/scavenge port does (perhaps better?). You might want to check it out. http://conshell.net/wiki/index.php/Scavenge Thanks for the pointer Mark, will check it out, not questioning if it's better or not, but it s

Re: patch upgrade for port committers?

2010-01-28 Thread Charlie Kester
On Thu 28 Jan 2010 at 18:25:30 PST Alberto Villa wrote: On 1/28/10, Charlie Kester wrote: On Thu 28 Jan 2010 at 13:37:06 PST Doug Barton wrote: When you submit a port/update that ADDS a file it is definitely worthwhile to mention this as well. Good advice that should be added to the porter's