I would wait the 0.3 release, hoping it will fix this build error.
Currently I shall close my PR.
wen
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Andrey S. Polyakov
wrote:
> It should be not an update, but a new port, for example py-ydbf-devel or
> py-ydbf03, because of 0.0.1 and 0.3rc1 is not compatible.
On Friday 08 January 2010 22:48:50 Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:40, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > VDPAU support would also be nice.
>
> Noted, thanks. I have overlooked that one. I'll include it with the
> next iteration in a few days.
Meanwhile, I tried getting it to work myself.
David Southwell wrote:
>> Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>>> Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Martin Wilke wrote:
> Please report any functionality which was working with previous
> versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any build
> failure.
Seem like the fix from
http://w
The FreeBSD KDE team is pleased to announce public call for testing Qt-4.6.0.
Ports can be downloaded from area51 repository:
svn co http://area51.pcbsd.org/trunk/area51/QT
and integrated into portstree using 'qtmerge' script from
http://area51.pcbsd.org/trunk/area51/Tools/scripts/
Alternative
> David Southwell wrote:
> >> Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> >>> Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> Martin Wilke wrote:
> > Please report any functionality which was working with previous
> > versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any build
> > failure.
>
> Seem like the
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > >> Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> > >>> Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> > Martin Wilke wrote:
> > > Please report any functionality which was working with previous
> > > versions of VirtualBox and no longer working with 3.1.2 or any
> > > build failure.
> >
> >
Does anyone own this port? mDNSResponder source from apple is now at version
-214. The latest source doesn't seem to compile properly (working on it...),
and -108 compiles but doesn't appear to actually
work.___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi rnoland.
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:04:52 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> One additional option that I've been considering, though I haven't tried
> it yet, it to construct a patch for 2.4.17 that essentially rolls
> libdrm_nouveau back to the 2.4.12 API. If we can pull that off, then
> everything i
As Mikhail T. wrote:
> Hi, Joerg! Yes, this is why I added you to CC, and I do think, that
> the common libbfd ought to have all of the known targets
> included. Even altogether they use very little space -- less, than
> having to add just one more flavor separately (even multiplied by
> the proba
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Michael Pittelko wrote:
> Does anyone own this port? mDNSResponder source from apple is now at
> version -214. The latest source doesn't seem to compile properly (working
> on it...), and -108 compiles but doesn't appear to actually
No, nobody owns it (when thi
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 12:19:51PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2010 22:48:50 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:40, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > > VDPAU support would also be nice.
> >
> > Noted, thanks. I have overlooked that one. I'll include it with the
> > n
On Saturday 09 January 2010 21:55:21 Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 12:19:51PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Friday 08 January 2010 22:48:50 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:40, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > > > VDPAU support would also be nice.
> > >
> > > Noted,
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: wine-1.1.36,1: no entry for /usr/ports/devel/flex
Committers on the hook:
edwin gerald marcus olgeni osa pav
Most recent CVS update was:
U audio/linux-fmodapi/Makefile
U a
On 01/07/10 19:56, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Thursday 07 January 2010 10:02:36 O. Hartmann wrote:
On 01/07/10 01:41, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 14:14:28 O. Hartmann wrote:
Dear Sirs,
We use a software package for scientific imagery processing from USGS,
ISIS3 (http://i
freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
> I've spent a great deal of time getting GCC 4.4 ported to FreeBSD on
> i386 and x86_64.
Thank you for continuing the work on gnat-gcc.
--
Regards,
Karel Miklav
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug,
Curious if I can get your comments about a possible change in portmaster
to change the behavior of its fetch method.
While currently its fetch method is optimal for a environment that has a
speedy ultra-fast connection, it runs havoc on a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:07, jhell@ wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug,
Curious if I can get your comments about a possible change in portmaster
to change the behavior of its fetch method.
While currently its fetch method
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:34:13PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On Saturday 09 January 2010 21:55:21 Yuri Pankov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 12:19:51PM +0100, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 08 January 2010 22:48:50 Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:40, Stefan Ehma
On 2010-01-09 21:58:35, Karel Miklav wrote:
> freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
> > I've spent a great deal of time getting GCC 4.4 ported to FreeBSD on
> > i386 and x86_64.
>
> Thank you for continuing the work on gnat-gcc.
You're welcome!
___
fre
20 matches
Mail list logo
