Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> >> According to PR 141131 I see exact

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Scott Bennett wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: >>> On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: > Accord

Re: Ports marked as IGNORE - (cups-pdf) & (urlview) why - how long?

2009-12-24 Thread David Southwell
> > > Looks like all the PR's were not in place before the test was run on > > > pointyhat. > > > > pointyhat doesn't have anything to do with PRs. It runs based on what > > is checked into CVS when its runs start. How would it be able to do > > otherwise? The ports PR count is currently 998. H

installing java

2009-12-24 Thread Sandra Kachelmann
Today I had the pleasure to install some java port and well it was quite frustrating. I still have to download all the distfiles manually. Isn't FreeBSD now officially supported by Sun? Is it really still necessary to manually fetch the distfiles or is this something that could be looked at again?

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling

Re: installing java

2009-12-24 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > Today I had the pleasure to install some java port and well it was > quite frustrating. I still have to download all the distfiles > manually. Isn't FreeBSD now officially supported by Sun? No, Sun does not officially support FreeBSD. Th

Re: installing java

2009-12-24 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:04:22PM +0100, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > Today I had the pleasure to install some java port and well it was > quite frustrating. I still have to download all the distfiles > manually. Isn't FreeBSD now officially supported by Sun? Is it really > still necessary to manual

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21,

Re: New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-24 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thursday 24 December 2009 06:43:02 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 10:00:18 +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tuesday 15 December 2009 09:10:47 Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> Uh -- is it actually possible to create an empty directory when >>> installing from a pkg tarball? >>> >>> I

ruby gemcutter ports - how to handle fetching?

2009-12-24 Thread Peter Schuller
Hello, I recently submitted two ports with master site set to http://gemcutter.ogr/gems/ because rubyforge did not have the .gem files. The ruby community seems to be transitioning to gemcutter, so it would be good if gemcutter gems were easily maintained in ports. I suppose gemcutter should be ad

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Beat Gaetzi wrote: > Rainer Hurling wrote: >> On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht >>> wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wro

Re: New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-24 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 24.12.2009 at 13:22:40 +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thursday 24 December 2009 06:43:02 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 10:00:18 +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Tuesday 15 December 2009 09:10:47 Matthew Seaman wrote: > >>> Uh -- is it actually possible to create an

Re: ports/141131: www/libxul does not compile any more

2009-12-24 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 24.12.2009 15:51 (UTC+1), Beat Gaetzi wrote: Beat Gaetzi wrote: Rainer Hurling wrote: On 24.12.2009 09:46 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:06 + Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 22.12.2009 10:3

CTF: sudo update

2009-12-24 Thread Wesley Shields
I'd like to update sudo to the latest version. I've done some testing locally and everything is fine but I would like further testing in other environments. If you are willing to test this out please apply the patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/sudo.diff and rebuild/reinstall sudo. If it work