On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> According to PR 141131 I see exactly the same error messages when I try
> to upgrade from libxul-1.9.0.15 to libxul-1.9.0.16:
>
> ---
> [..snip..]
> cc -o FreeBSD9.0_OPT.OBJ/FreeBSD_SINGLE_SHLIB/dsa.
> David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi just curious about:
> >
> > - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
> > - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
> >
> > Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a.
>
> $ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf
> $ make
> ===> cups-pdf-2.5.0 is
On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
According to PR 141131 I see exactly the same error messages when I try
to upgrade from libxul-1.9.0.15 to libxul-1.9.0.16:
---
[..snip..]
cc -o
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:26:38AM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 04:58 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:34:22 +0900
> > Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > > > I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base,
> > > > graphics/dri,
> > > >
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> >> According to PR 141131 I see exactly the same error messages when I try
> >> to upgrade from libxul-1.9.0
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > Hi just curious about:
> > >
> > > - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
> > > - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
> > >
> > > Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgr
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 11:23 +, David Southwell wrote:
> > David Southwell wrote:
> > > Hi just curious about:
> > >
> > > - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
> > > - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
> > >
> > > Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a.
Selon David Southwell le Mar 22 déc 12:23:58 2009 :
[Cc: trimmed]
I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a
functioning
port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled
OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0 installed which appears to
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
> > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > Hi just curious about:
> > > >
> > > > - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
> > > > - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
> > > >
> > > > Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNO
Thierry added his wisdom on 22nd Dec:
> Selon David Southwell le Mar 22 déc 12:23:58 2009 :
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
>> > > >David Southwell wrote:
> > > >> Hi just curious about:
> > > >>
> > > >> - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
> > > >> - tex
David Southwell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat:
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html
Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not fail on
> David Southwell wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
> >>
> >> Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat:
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html
> >
> > Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but c
Hi,
I've just discovered that the port mail/x-face-e21 depends upon
both gtk12 and gtk20:
-
% make -C /usr/ports/mail/x-face-e21 all-depends-list | grep 'gtk[12]'
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12
-
Gtk12 is an inherited dependency of mail/faces.
Is this OK? Or
Hi,
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:02:02 +0300
> Boris Samorodov said:
bsam> I've just discovered that the port mail/x-face-e21 depends upon
bsam> both gtk12 and gtk20:
bsam> -
bsam> % make -C /usr/ports/mail/x-face-e21 all-depends-list | grep 'gtk[12]'
bsam> /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20
Hi rnoland.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600
Robert Noland wrote:
> As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
> just after 2.4.12 and the bits that broke nouveau were just before
> 2.4.13...
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 02:03 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi rnoland.
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600
> Robert Noland wrote:
> > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> > order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
> > just a
Hello,
unfortunately, I don't use FreeBSD anymore and I can no longer
maintain the port security/amavis-stats.
So I want to drop the maintainership, thanks.
---
Mantas
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
David Southwell wrote:
===> cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install.
> I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining
Why do you think the fact that it compiles is relevant? :)
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presen
> > Looks like all the PR's were not in place before the test was run on
> > pointyhat.
>
> pointyhat doesn't have anything to do with PRs. It runs based on what
> is checked into CVS when its runs start. How would it be able to do
> otherwise? The ports PR count is currently 998. How is a com
I am looking at updating a port that now lives on launchpad.net, but
I don't see anything for launchpad.net in bsd.sites.mk
Does anyone know anything about how launchpad.net and its mirrors (if
any) support downloads? Or can suggest a way to support that site
in bsd.sites.mk.
Here are some examp
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland wrote:
> > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> > order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
> > just after 2.4.12
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland
> > wrote:
> > > As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
> > > order to keep nouveau wor
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:38:50PM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland
> > > wrote:
> > > > As much as I don't want to, I
23 matches
Mail list logo
