Hi,
does someone has started updating the linux-js port for the new USB
interface in the kernel? I'm trying it at the moment and do not want to do
work twice.
Greetings,
Martin L.
PS: I'm not subscribed to the ports mailing list - so please also reply
directly.
__
Hey everyone,
Does anyone know of there is someone working on updating the input-wacom
driver ? The current port is broken on FreeBSD >= 8 and outdated. It
would be a shame if the driver realy dies; without the absolute
positioning the pen-tablets are not as usefull as they could be. I'm
don'
===> Building for ghostscript8-8.70
/bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/obj
/bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/bin
/bin/mkdir -p
/usr/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/freetype/include
/bin/ln -s -f /usr/local/include/ft2bu
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:38:05 +0100
Frank Staals articulated:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Does anyone know of there is someone working on updating the
> input-wacom driver ? The current port is broken on FreeBSD >= 8 and
> outdated. It would be a shame if the driver realy dies; without the
> absolute pos
This was under stable/6; it may be relevant to note that as I have 4
slices configured on my laptop's disk, each of which is bootable
(stable/6, stable/7, stable/8, & head), /usr/ports is actually a symlink
from each of those slices to a file system that is mountable regardless
of which slice is bo
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:39:48 +0100
Martin Laabs articulated:
> Hi,
>
> does someone has started updating the linux-js port for the new USB
> interface in the kernel? I'm trying it at the moment and do not want
> to do work twice.
>
> Greetings,
> Martin L.
>
> PS: I'm not subscribed to the
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 05:18:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> This was under stable/6; it may be relevant to note that as I have 4
> slices configured on my laptop's disk, each of which is bootable
> (stable/6, stable/7, stable/8, & head), /usr/ports is actually a symlink
> from each of those
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> ...
> > (Though I note that
> > /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/
> > does seem to be populated with several other files.)
>
> is this i386?
Aye
> I reported this already for sparc and ia64:
> http
Frank Staals wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Does anyone know of there is someone working on updating the input-wacom
> driver ? The current port is broken on FreeBSD >= 8 and outdated. It
> would be a shame if the driver realy dies; without the absolute
> positioning the pen-tablets are not as usefull
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:32:38 -0800
David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > ...
> > > (Though I note that
> > > /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/
> > > does seem to be populated with several other files.)
> >
> > is
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Frank Staals wrote:
Hey everyone,
Does anyone know of there is someone working on updating the input-wacom
driver ? The current port is broken on FreeBSD >= 8 and outdated. It
would be a shame if the driver realy dies; without the absolute
positioning the pen-tablets a
On 20.12.2009 14:18 (UTC+1), David Wolfskill wrote:
This was under stable/6; it may be relevant to note that as I have 4
slices configured on my laptop's disk, each of which is bootable
(stable/6, stable/7, stable/8,& head), /usr/ports is actually a symlink
from each of those slices to a file sy
Hi everyone!
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:42:43 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
> graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
> graphics/libdrm. Please see also my attached patch file. I'll
>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> OK, jylef...@freebsd.org is listed in the 'pkg-descr' file, although
> apparently he no longer maintains the port. You might try contacting
> them anyway.
Jean-Yves has not been active for over 2 years now.
(This is kind of why I don't like
Hi list,
per suggestion of the original poster, I added a desktop entry to the
Makefile of devel/argouml. Installing the port fails because the
resulting pkg-plist is incorrect. The patch seems correct according to
the Porters Handbook (
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/port
David Wolfskill wrote
in <20091220133238.gr...@bunrab.catwhisker.org>:
da> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
da> > ...
da> > > (Though I note that
/bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/ghostscript-8.70/base/
da> > > does seem to be populated with several other fi
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:14:19 -0600
Mark Linimon articulated:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:25:08AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > OK, jylef...@freebsd.org is listed in the 'pkg-descr' file, although
> > apparently he no longer maintains the port. You might try contacting
> > them anyway.
>
> Jean-Yves h
Doug Barton wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I don't know if it is well known / documented somewhere in portmaster,
but after debugging, I realized that pkg_add on FreeBSD 6.3 has no long
options
This is why all of the ports tools should be in the ports tree. :)
I just added the fix to the svn
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:34:22 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
> > graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
> > graphics/libdrm. Please see also my attached patch file. I'll
> > update these
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> David Wolfskill wrote
> in <20091220133238.gr...@bunrab.catwhisker.org>:
>
> da> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:27:31PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> da> > ...
> da> > > (Though I note that
> /bkp/ports/print/ghostscript8/work/gho
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> It is not working - pkg_add on 6.3 has no option for "Install the
> package without fetching and installing dependencies". I mean, there is
> no long nor short option for this, so this portmaster's functionality
> cannot be easily ported to 6.3. That's why I suggest to dis
Mark Linimon wrote:
> (This is kind of why I don't like the entries in pkg-descr; they
> just become stale.)
Yes, especially if the person who resets MAINTAINER does not also
update the pkg-descr. :)
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain nam
Hi!
I did try to update port from the subject and I got:
Error: /undefinedfilename in --file--
Operand stack:
(/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE
> was enabled regardless of the platform.
I'm still not able to build this. I've updated my ports tree which
hasn't helped. Is there anything else I can do to get
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:54:42AM +, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> > Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE
> > was enabled regardless of the platform.
>
> I'm still not able to build this. I've update
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:54:42AM +, Jamie Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> > Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE
> > was enabled regardless of the platform.
>
> I'm still not able to build this. I've update
Jamie Griffin wrote
in <20091221005442.ga54...@bsdbox.koderize.com>:
jg> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:06:39AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
jg>
jg> > Fixed just now. This build error occurred only when WITH_FT_BRIDGE
jg> > was enabled regardless of the platform.
jg>
jg> I'm still not able to build
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:57:50AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript8
> make distclean
> make rmconfig
> make
This did the trick. Oddly, though, I did do this about an hour ago and
it still failed but, and probably completely coincidental, I rebooted
and gave it
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:40:58PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:17:40PM +0300, Andrew Belashov wrote:
> > Hi, Anton!
> >
> > Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64
> > > port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build:
> > >
> > >
> > > Ma
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common probl
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common probl
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port, inclu
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port, inclu
35 matches
Mail list logo
