On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:26:34AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> dave wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:20 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >> Correct. In fact, it possibly means the LICENSE ends up in the plist
> >> twice, which is almost as bad as it not being mentioned at all.
> >
> > Ok, I t
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
OpenOffice is one of our most complex packages, and, depending on which
package node it builds on, can take nearly a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
>> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>
There are packages available at the FreeBSD porting page
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> > I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> > OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>
> OpenOffice is one of our most complex packages, a
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
> Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>>> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
>>> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>> OpenOffice is one of o
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
> > Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> >>> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> >>>
Hi,
is this really being maintained? ftree dumps core on a FBSD 7.2-stable
[i386] system with linux-base-fc-4-4_15 installed.
Any ideas? Thanks.
--
Jim Smith
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Hiya,
Could someone take a look at this PR and patch please?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140175
No response since 1 Nov. Would be nice to get it committed.
Thanks!
Regards,
Aragon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aragon Gouveia wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> Could someone take a look at this PR and patch please?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=140175
>
> No response since 1 Nov. Would be nice to get it committed.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
> Aragon
H
Jim Smith writes:
> is this really being maintained? ftree dumps core on a FBSD 7.2-stable
> [i386] system with linux-base-fc-4-4_15 installed.
I just tried it, same setup, and it worked for me.
I had no idea how to use it properly, but it started,
I created a couple of entries, saved them, qui
I am encountering the following error while trying to compile
converters/libutf-8 inside of a jail. The host machine is a freshly compiled
FreeBSD 7.2-p4 amd64 system, as with the jail, and both have an up to date
ports tree. I've been able to replicate the error on the host machine, and
second mac
The current libcanberra - "libcanberra-0.10.tar.gz" - doesn't handle
multithreaded gtk applications well (doesn't take the gdk lock when
playing sounds), which is supposedly fixed in the latest release. Are
there any plans of doing updates in the near future?
br - Nikolaj Thygesen
Hey Greg,
Greg Larkin wrote:
I will work on the PR, but there's also an upgrade to 2.62-3 that needs
to be incorporated. If you have some spare cycles and can update the PR
with a diff for both, that would help me a lot.
I made some time for this tonight. I've sent a follow up to the PR
whi
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 00:53 +0100, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote:
> The current libcanberra - "libcanberra-0.10.tar.gz" - doesn't handle
> multithreaded gtk applications well (doesn't take the gdk lock when
> playing sounds), which is supposedly fixed in the latest release. Are
> there any plans of doi
14 matches
Mail list logo
