Pike (lang/pike78) on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-06-29 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
Hi, Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 7.2 (from 7.1), my Pike installation has been hanging regularly. When this happens, there is always one pike process in [wait] state and one in [umtxn] (from top). Thinking I might solve it by recompiling, I tried removing it and compiling from ports. However, the

error updating lighttpd

2009-06-29 Thread Paul Macdonald
on 6.2-RELEASE Making install in src make install-am test -z "/usr/local/lib/lighttpd" || .././install-sh -c -d "/usr/local/lib/lighttpd" /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'mod_flv_streaming.la' '/usr/local/lib/lighttpd/mod_flv_streaming.la' CDPATH: not found func_opt_s

Re: Pike (lang/pike78) on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-06-29 Thread Johan van Selst
Hi Arjan, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 7.2 (from 7.1), my Pike installation has been > hanging regularly. When this happens, there is always one pike process in > [wait] state and one in [umtxn] (from top). I use Pike frequently on 7.2 systems, but haven't seen this prob

Re: Pike (lang/pike78) on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-06-29 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:25:42AM +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi, > > Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 7.2 (from 7.1), my Pike installation has been > hanging regularly. When this happens, there is always one pike process in > [wait] state and one in [umtxn] (from top). Is pike multithreaded ? I

Re: Pike (lang/pike78) on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-06-29 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
2009/6/29 Kostik Belousov > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:25:42AM +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since I upgraded to FreeBSD 7.2 (from 7.1), my Pike installation has been > > hanging regularly. When this happens, there is always one pike process in > > [wait] state and one in [umtxn

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2009-06-29 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

call for testing: print/hplip update

2009-06-29 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
Hi! Chris Petrik made an update for print/hplip port to version 3.9.6. The maintainer didn't respond, so I thought it'd be nice to test the update before committing and also decide whether it requires a repocopy to preserve current version of hplip. The port is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~a

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-06-29 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: make: don't know how to make index. Stop Committers on the hook: Most recent CVS update was: ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mai

Re: call for testing: print/hplip update

2009-06-29 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:22:36 +0400 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > Hi! > > Chris Petrik made an update for print/hplip > port to version 3.9.6. The maintainer didn't respond, so I thought > it'd be nice to test the update before committing and also decide > whether it requires a repocopy to preserve

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2009-06-29 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: error updating lighttpd

2009-06-29 Thread Paul Macdonald
libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4, but the libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from an older release. have just noticed that this was fixed after a ports tree update.. Paul. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.

devel/boost: new patch for testing update to 1.39

2009-06-29 Thread Alexander Churanov
Hi folks! I've made several changes to new set of boost ports. Please, review them and test new set of ports, if possible. The updated diff is at http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-2009-06-29-14-38.diff The updated tarball is at http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-ports-20090

Re: call for testing: print/hplip update

2009-06-29 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jerry writes: > to test this newer version. I do have one question though; what is a > 'repocopy'? My funky Webster doesn't list it. Would I be correct in > assuming that you are referring to backing up the installed version > in case it has to be reinstalled if the newer version bombs out? http

Mysq server 5.4 port

2009-06-29 Thread msdi
Hi, I would like to know if you have an eta for the mysql-server 5.4 port ? I would really like to see the port before the 10th of july... If it can help, I am willing to make a 100$ donation to you or an open source project of your choice. Let me know if you think it's possible. Regards __

Re: Mysq server 5.4 port

2009-06-29 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
m...@msdi.ca wrote: Hi, I would like to know if you have an eta for the mysql-server 5.4 port ? I would really like to see the port before the 10th of july... If it can help, I am willing to make a 100$ donation to you or an open source project of your choice. Let me know if you think it's pos

Re: Mysq server 5.4 port

2009-06-29 Thread Ian Lord
It's just that we have a software using mysql as a backend and we have a performance problem that was fixed in mysql 5.4. We compiled it by hand and we are satisfied with the stability of it. We would like to have it before the 10th of july because we are planning a maintenance window on the 17

Re: next abort of perl upgrade encountered--linux-pango security problem :-(

2009-06-29 Thread Scott Bennett
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:52:50 +0300 "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: >÷ Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:37:52 +0300 >"Sergey V. Dyatko" ÐÉÛÅÔ: > >SVD> ÷ Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:21:19 -0500 (CDT) >SVD> Scott Bennett ÐÉÛÅÔ: >SVD> >SVD> SB> The saga of failures in the perl upgrade continues with >SVD> SB> the f

Re: [REPOST] problem upgrading perl

2009-06-29 Thread Scott Bennett
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:48:45 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:11 -0700 Doug Barton >> wrote: >> There ought to be an automated way to deal with the package issue that >> causes the failure of the entire update run just because it wants a h

Re: net-im/ayttm: I'd like to take the maintainership

2009-06-29 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: [...] > Please, send a new patch changing MAINTAINER line to your email address as a > Follow-up to the PR and the port will be assigned to you. Ok, please close PR 136117. I just submitted PR 136174, which does the following: * Upgrade port