Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Carlos A. M. dos
Santos wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
matt donovan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih
wrote:
I thi
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
[...]
>> Opps, now I got it: the official 7.2.041 patch can not be applied
>> cleanly so David provided a custom one. Choosing "%" to differentiate
>> it, however, was a bad idea. It would be better to use a s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 23, 2009 10:27:59 pm Eitan Adler wrote:
> > I would like for it to be a real category, so we can unclutter the misc/
> > folder, and encourage more local/internationalized stuff in the new
> > category.
>
> I would like it to be a virtual categ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category
> >becomes a catch all for both entities.
>
> If i18n is too cryptic or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 23, 2009 05:35:16 pm Tim Bishop wrote:
> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is
> > too long, why not go with "nls"?
>
> How about internationalisation? ;-)
>
> Tim.
As a Canadian who prefers en_GB, I fought
2009/6/24 Thomas Abthorpe :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On June 23, 2009 05:35:16 pm Tim Bishop wrote:
>> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is
>> > too long, why not go with "nls"?
>>
>> How about internationalisation? ;-)
>>
>> Tim.
>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
[snip]
> Though I still reserve the right to hate the inconsistent use of 'z'
> (why internationalize but surmise;
I guess "surmise" just hasn't been US-ized yet :P
> realize but enterprise, etc etc)!
Er, isn't this
2009/6/24 Peter Pentchev :
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> [snip]
>> Though I still reserve the right to hate the inconsistent use of 'z'
>> (why internationalize but surmise;
>
> I guess "surmise" just hasn't been US-ized yet :P
>
>> realize but enterprise, etc etc)
Hey
Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster.
After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on
IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the
great work!
Sincerely,
- Dan Naumov
___
fre
Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hey
>
> Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster.
> After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on
> IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the
> great work!
Thank you for the kind words, they are greatly
On Wed 24 Jun 2009 at 06:56:10 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote:
On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
>Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category
>becomes a cat
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:53:13 +0300
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> [snip]
> > Though I still reserve the right to hate the inconsistent use of 'z'
> > (why internationalize but surmise;
>
> I guess "surmise" just hasn't been US-ized yet :P
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On June 24, 2009 02:24:01 pm Charlie Kester wrote:
> >On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote:
> >> On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> >> >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category
> >> >becom
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hey
>
> Just thought I'd drop a line to thank you for creating portmaster.
> After discovering it yesterday thanks to a tip I got from somebody on
> IRC, it has now completely replaced portupgrade for me. Keep up the
> great work!
Thank you for
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:11 -0700 Doug Barton
wrote:
>Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Thank you for doing that. Unfortunately, it might have been more
>> appropriate to have simply replaced that note with another that cautions
>> anyone attempting the perl upgrade that the upgrade has not been
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:31:36 +0300 "Sergey V. Dyatko"
wrote:
>÷ Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:12:17 -0500 (CDT)
>Scott Bennett ÐÉÛÅÔ:
>
>SB> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:42:51 -0700 Doug Barton
>SB> wrote:
>SB> >Jim Trigg wrote:
>SB> >> Actually, he was suggesting changing from perl\* to perl-\* so
>S
> I'm constantly involved in a fight between my 'evil' and 'good' side;
> I can't stand the usual US spellings as a Brit, but I always end up
> admitting to myself that US spellings generally:
>
>make more sense;
Coming from an American:
$make more sense;
make: don't know how to make more. Sto
> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
> > internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
>
> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
Anyone care for "intlzn"? It's short, should still tab-complete
from "in", and it may be a bit less cryptic than
The saga of failures in the perl upgrade continues with the following:
===> linux-gtk2-2.6.10_3 depends on file:
/compat/linux/usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.1001.1 - not found
===>Verifying install for /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.1001.1 in
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-pango
=
В Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:21:19 -0500 (CDT)
Scott Bennett пишет:
SB> The saga of failures in the perl upgrade continues with the
SB> following:
SB>
SB> ===> linux-gtk2-2.6.10_3 depends on
SB> file: /compat/linux/usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0.1001.1 - not found
SB> ===>Verifying install
SB> fo
В Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:37:52 +0300
"Sergey V. Dyatko" пишет:
SVD> В Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:21:19 -0500 (CDT)
SVD> Scott Bennett пишет:
SVD>
SVD> SB> The saga of failures in the perl upgrade continues with
SVD> SB> the following:
SVD> SB>
SVD> SB> ===> linux-gtk2-2.6.10_3 depends on
SVD> SB>
21 matches
Mail list logo
