Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send an

/security/logcheck-1.2.54 build failure

Greetings- The build of the logcheck port fails like this: ===> Compressing manual pages for docbook2X-0.8.8_1 ===> Registering installation for docbook2X-0.8.8_1 ===> Returning to build of logcheck-1.2.54_3 ===> logcheck-1.2.54_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 - found ===> C

Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

Yuri writes: > I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc > depend on firefox-2. > Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? This is a question you should ask of those who write the programs, who in general have no direct connection with FreeBSD.

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

Yuri writes: > I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend > on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists in the ports system, and I don't remember using a browser with any of t

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

Lowell Gilbert wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists in the ports system, and I don't remember using a browser w

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:37:13 -0500, Yuri wrote: Lowell Gilbert wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists in the ports s

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri wrote: > I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on > firefox-2. > Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko engine with WITH_GECKO, if you want to use libxul, the one firefox3 uses, just use: WITH_GECKO=libxu

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

Renato Botelho wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko engine with WITH_GECKO, if you want to use libxul, the one firefox3 uses, just us

Re: FreeBSD Port: libspf2-1.0.4_1

On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: I'm not sure if mail/postfix-policyd-spf will work with mail/libspf2. It won't work on either of my systems that way. postfix-policyd-spf won't build against libspf2. (Breaks during configure, complaining of unusable header files) -j

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 02:09:30AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend > on firefox-2. > Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? A related question is why www/firefox is still Firefox 2, and all the browser plugins like swfdec only work with

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 20:43 +0200, army.of.root wrote: > Renato Botelho wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri wrote: > >> I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on > >> firefox-2. > >> Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? > > > > You can change gecko e

Unable to build mono/mcs

` I'm on 6.4-STABLE and I've been unable to build this port for some time. I end up having to type ^C to interrupt the portupgrade process and then I see this: gmake[6]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-2.0.1/mcs' *** The compiler 'false' doesn't appear to be usable. *** Trying

[CFT] QT-4.5.1 testers wanted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Howdy, The KDE Team is happy to announce the first public Call for Testing with QT-4.5.1. Recently, we focused on the complex and very time consuming task of getting the QT4.5 ports into much better shape so we can now go on the next step: much wider

Re: [CFT] QT-4.5.1 testers wanted

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Howdy, > > The KDE Team is happy to announce the first public Call for Testing > with QT-4.5.1. Recently, we focused on the complex and very time > consuming task of getting the QT4.5 ports i

INDEX build failed for 6.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: gxneur-0.9.2: no entry for /usr/ports/russian/xneur make_index: gxneur-0.9.2: no entry for /usr/ports/russian/xneur Committers on the

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2009, 20:43 +0200 schrieb army.of.root: > Renato Botelho wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri wrote: > >> I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on > >> firefox-2. > >> Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? > > > > You can change

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid build failure

Hi, misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid is fails to build on my FreeBSD 6.4 machine: # uname -a FreeBSD blizzard.phoenix 6.4-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p1 #0: Sun Dec 21 07:56:41 UTC 2008 r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 # pwd /usr/ports/misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid #