Hello maillist,
I've planned porting some software to FreeBSD and currently generate Makefile
for ports. My application required presence of some account in system.
I've see many sample from current ports like "squid, cacti, avahi, mysql,
pgsql, cups, distcc..." and many-many-many, they are us
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200:
>
>>> Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the
>>> port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX
>>> file.
>>>
>> I don't see how this is connected to my question.
Dominic Fandrey píše v pá 03. 04. 2009 v 11:46 +0200:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200:
> >
> >>> Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the
> >>> port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX
> >
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:12:18 +0400
subbsd wrote:
> My question - why do not make this facility by generic (for example
> create add/del/check-existence procedure in
> some /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.users.mk file) ?
Presumably because the same functionality has to go into package files,
and work for some
The ports freeze for the upcoming release of 7.2 will start in
one week time on April 13. Release packages will be built immediately
and have to be ready for RC2 which is scheduled for March 20. To keep
the freeze as short as possible, the date might be moved depending on
any delays in the src re
2009/4/3 Dmitry Marakasov :
> Not sure if splitting it into many small libraries is a good idea. How
> many are there, btw? Is it a port per libboost_*so, or per
> include/boost/* ?
Neither. Per the list of libraries: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0
There are 95 libraries in boost.
Those th
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:12:18 +0400
> subbsd wrote:
>
>
>> My question - why do not make this facility by generic (for example
>> create add/del/check-existence procedure in
>> some /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.users.mk file) ?
>
> Presumably because the same functi
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey píše v pá 03. 04. 2009 v 11:46 +0200:
>> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>> Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200:
>>>
> Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the
> port being upgraded, then look up this value in sec
For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk.
bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1.0.so.8.1.0.
But I have:
$ pkg_which /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/libscim-1.0.so.8.1.1
linux-scim-libs-fc7-1.4.5_2
And yes, I have OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7.
So acroread8 can't detect
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk.
> bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1.0.so.8.1.0.
> But I have:
> $ pkg_which /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/libscim-1.0.so.8.1.1
> linux-scim-libs-fc7-1.4.5_2
> And ye
on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk.
>> bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1.0.so.8.1.0.
>> But I have:
>> $ pkg_which /usr/compat/linux/usr/
Hi
I want to know if there is not more the tarball gnome2, gnome2-lite, KDE4,
etc via pkg_add -r for version current i386
Whenever I try, return package not found.
Just getting through ports, but rather takes to compile.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Live free or die - UNIX* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
-=-=-=-=-=-
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >
> >> For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk.
> >> bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote:
> There are 95 libraries in boost.
Woo, that's sure too many.
> Let me explain that:
> Boost has source-only libraries and separately-compiled libraries.
> Source-only libraries consist of header files only and do not require
> any compil
in message <20090403154943.ga51...@holstein.holy.cow>,
wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
>
> I am finally annoyed enough the message produced by pulseaudio ...
^
^
"by"
> Apr 3 05:15:12 holstein pulseaudio[91444]
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following:
>>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk.
bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this t
I am finally annoyed enough the message produced by pulseaudio ...
Apr 3 05:15:12 holstein pulseaudio[91444]: main.c: Daemon startup failed.
... whenever flash plugin (graphics/swfdec, www/swfdec-plugin) is
invoked in Firefox. I tried building the port with default options
selected, and no o
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> >>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>
> For instance: acroread8
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:04 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >> on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following:
> > >>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:0
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:04 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote:
>>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following:
>> O
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:09:26 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:04 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote:
> >>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
I have been having a terrible time trying to compile postfix-policyd-
spf.
Before I go into details, I'd like to ask whether there is an
alternative way to get a postfix SPF milter running. If I can skip
this package, I think I'll be much happier.
postfix-policyd-spf specifically depends
22 matches
Mail list logo
