As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common probl
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common probl
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port, inclu
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port, inclu
Hello,
Am I the only one unable to start wine on CURRENT?
bug ~# wine progman
Assertion failed: (heap_base != (void *)-1), function virtual_init,
file virtual.c, line 1314.
[1]2797 abort (core dumped) wine progman
It's been that way for a few months now and it's still the same with
Hi,
I recently posted here due to trouble remove some old dependency. I was
complaining that despite of mention in UPDATE saying tcl/tk 8.5 is now
the default version, some application still install tcl/tk 8.4.
I find out that it's just net-im/amsn ports
BUILD_DEPENDS= wish8.4:${PORTSDIR}/x11-
Tijl Coosemans (t...@ulyssis.org) on 09/03/2009 at 12:37 wrote:
> > It's been that way for a few months now and it's still the same with
> > wine-1.1.15 port.
>
> What patches do you have in emulators/wine/files?
One only: patch-dlls-ntdll-virtual.c
MD5 (patch-dlls-ntdll-virtual.c) = 3cc70a2f146
On Monday 09 March 2009 09:51:53 Guy Brand wrote:
> Am I the only one unable to start wine on CURRENT?
>
> bug ~# wine progman
> Assertion failed: (heap_base != (void *)-1), function virtual_init,
> file virtual.c, line 1314.
> [1]2797 abort (core dumped) wine progman
>
> It's been t
Guy Brand writes:
> Am I the only one unable to start wine on CURRENT?
>
>bug ~# wine progman
>Assertion failed: (heap_base != (void *)-1), function virtual_init,
>file virtual.c, line 1314.
>[1]2797 abort (core dumped) wine progman
>
> It's been that way for a few month
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 09:51, Guy Brand wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Am I the only one unable to start wine on CURRENT?
>
> bug ~# wine progman
> Assertion failed: (heap_base != (void *)-1), function virtual_init,
> file virtual.c, line 1314.
> [1] 2797 abort (core dumped) wine progman
>
> It's b
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:14:13 +0100
Sebastien Chassot wrote:
>
> As this port has no maintainer what's the best way to update it? I
> mean who may do this? (I'm not use with port process)
Anyone can submit a PR with a patch.
http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html
__
Le Lundi 09 mars 2009 à 12:32 +, RW a écrit :
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:14:13 +0100
> Sebastien Chassot wrote:
>
> >
> > As this port has no maintainer what's the best way to update it? I
> > mean who may do this? (I'm not use with port process)
>
> Anyone can submit a PR with a patch.
>
>
I think this was probably intended for the list rather than me:
On Mar 8, 4:04 pm, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
>
> Chuck Robey wrote:
> > Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me
> > what's causing portmanager to want to patch my bsd.port.mk, and why
>
[1]Hallmark.com [2]Shop Online [3]Hallmark Magazine [4]E-Cards & More
[5]At Gold Crown
You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.
Hello!
You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card.
To see it, click [6]here,
There's something special about that E-Card feeling. We invite you to
Hello all,
Not long after we bumped the libsndfile port to 1.0.18, it turned out
there was an undisclosed security vulnerability. The author decided to
release a new version, 1.0.19. An advantage of this version is that it
also works with a *released* version of libvorbis, so we don't need the
awf
* Ed Schouten wrote:
> Shall I commit this patch to SVN?
CVS. I've been hacking on src too much, I guess.
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpeKxGH3Ykl3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:56:51PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Not long after we bumped the libsndfile port to 1.0.18, it turned out
> there was an undisclosed security vulnerability. The author decided to
> release a new version, 1.0.19. An advantage of this version is that it
> al
Is somebody working on a new Mailscanner port, i remember reading somewhere
that there was a new port for mailscanner but i can not find it.
I also ask this because the current MailScanner port does not work with the
latest perl (5.8.9).
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
_
It seems that someone has decided to move php5-pcre back out of lang/php5.
I don't want to have to go through the pain of updating hundreds of
virtual servers yet again, just because someone can't make up their mind.
Anyone know how do I build the PHP5 port so that PCRE is included?
Cheers,
Ste
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: p5-Catalyst-Engine-HTTP-Prefork-0.50: no entry for
/usr/ports/www/p5-Cookie-XS
make_index: p5-Catalyst-Engine-HTTP-Prefork-0.50: no e
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:38 +, RW wrote:
> I think this was probably intended for the list rather than me:
>
> On Mar 8, 4:04 pm, RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
> >
> > Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me
> > > what's ca
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 08:02:14PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> With 8.0 coming up, it's time to take a look at the ports that have
> been broken by some recent changes to freebsd-current. I have put
> a list of these ports, categorized by which change, on the wiki at
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Por
Dear Foundation Representative,
My name is Jennifer Winn, Event Manager for the Center for
Nonprofit Success, and I am writing to invite you to speak on a
grantmaking panel at the Fundraising Summit that we will be
hosting again this year at New York University on June 3-4, 2009.
This year, we
Is there hope of a port of the latest OpenSC reelease? It's been
reported that there is a serious security vulnerability in the current
port.
http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-announce/2009-February/23.html
If nothing else, the 0.11.6 port needs to be marked as FORBIDDEN.
If I ge
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello,
How is the progress of the shiny new MythTV port update?
As you might have seen the port is scheduled for deletion this month:
portname: multimedia/mythtv
description:MythTV is a homebrew PVR project
maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
status: BROKEN
depreca
Guy Brand wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Am I the only one unable to start wine on CURRENT?
>
> bug ~# wine progman
> Assertion failed: (heap_base != (void *)-1), function virtual_init,
> file virtual.c, line 1314.
> [1]2797 abort (core dumped) wine progman
>
> It's been that way for a few
Hi there - found a small bug in the ports build Makefile for
dovecot-1.1.11 on Freebsd v7.0.
Simply: you need to specify v4.2+ of the Berkeley DB package.
You just want to change the 'yes' to '42+', since db-4.1 doesn't
include libdb.so. Also if 4.1 is installed in addition to any other db
libra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RW wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
>> causing portmanager to want to patch my bsd.port.mk, and why the
>> patchfile should be so far off, and
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
> > Chuck Robey wrote:
> >
> >> Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
> >> causing portmanager to want to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> RW wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey wrote:
> Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
> causing por
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:24 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Noland wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> > Here's the po
Chuck Robey wrote:
> Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from
> more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive.
> If
> it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted that as being dead, I wasn't
> trying
> to be insulting, maybe I m
36 matches
Mail list logo
