2009/2/20 Li-Wen Hsu
>
> That is great and I made another patch based on your own, which fixed
> some minor problems
> (includes building on amd64):
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/boost-1.37.diff
I've examined your patch. It really adds useful things besides indentation
:-) . I've also no
I recently updated my ports and rebuilt and now any time I try to run
nedit, I get a handfull of "Cannot load font." errors followed by a
segfault. However, *if* I have xfontsel running, I only get a few
warnings, then nedit runs normally. Maybe some fonts have been
removed? I have performed
Hi,
I'd like to request that the gluster clustering/filesystem software be
ported and supported. This looks to be a very simple, straightforward
and viable clustering solution which FreeBSD has always lacked.
Thank you,
Paul Pathiakis
Paul Pathiakis
UNIX/Linux Systems Engineer
Ir
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Stephen Hurd wrote:
I recently updated my ports and rebuilt and now any time I try to run nedit,
I get a handfull of "Cannot load font." errors followed by a segfault.
However, *if* I have xfontsel running, I only get a few warnings, then nedit
runs normally. Maybe some f
On Feb 20, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Pathiakis, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to request that the gluster clustering/filesystem software be
ported and supported. This looks to be a very simple, straightforward
and viable clustering solution which FreeBSD has always lacked.
This looks like a very inter
Steven,
I'm going to start testing it in a pre-production environment. It seems
so straightforward, integrates with ZFS, it has simple configuration
files, all around, I'm hoping that it garners more
clustering/replication for FreeBSD. Many of the other solutions are
quite tedious and setup comp
2009/2/21 Pathiakis, Paul :
> Steven,
>
> I'm going to start testing it in a pre-production environment. It seems
> so straightforward, integrates with ZFS, it has simple configuration
> files, all around, I'm hoping that it garners more
> clustering/replication for FreeBSD. Many of the other sol
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:15:53PM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> This also useful. How much time is takes for you, guys, to rebuild all ports
> that depend on boost?
It takes a couple of days to run an incremental experimental ports build
such as this. However, note that we have heavy demand
> You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed
> to Lawrence Auster's Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from
> our mailing list, please let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284
Could somebody living in US please call Mr Auster and ask him to stop
sending his newsletter to thi
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos > Could
somebody living in US please call Mr Auster and ask him to stop
> sending his newsletter to this list?
>
Mark it as spam and move on.
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Eric L. Chen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:06 +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> I'm running sonata with Python 2.6, or rather I used to:
>>
>> File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/glib/__init__.py", line
>> 30, in
>> from glib._glib import *
>> ImportError: /usr/local/lib/p
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:15:53 +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> 2009/2/20 Li-Wen Hsu
>
> > That is great and I made another patch based on your own, which fixed
> > some minor problems
> > (includes building on amd64):
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/boost-1.37.diff
>
> I've examined you
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>> You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed
>> to Lawrence Auster's Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from
>> our mailing list, please let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284
>
> Could somebody living in US please call Mr Auster and ask him
Hi,
i am trying to provide libraries for FreeBSD
and Linux via a build system based on autotools.
My problem is that the .so numbers get produced
differently on both systems.
E.g.
libburn.so.31 on FreeBSD
libburn.so.4.27.0 on Linux
This has the consequence that on Linux older
applicatio
Hi
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:06:18PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Thanks for throughout message about possibilities of
> porting TexLive to FreeBSD. This work is highly
> appeciated!
Thanks
> Personally, I think we should stick with #2 of your plan,
> as going with #3 will bring too many port
With respect to Thunar's dependencies, I was wondering if
xfce4-mcs-manager and xfce4-panel are strictly required? The Debian
package of Thunar lists xfce4-panel as a recommendation and makes no
mention of xfce4-mcs-manager.
I've been using openbox and I installed the Thunar port for file
man
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:23:43 -0600, Thomas Schmitt
wrote:
Hi,
i am trying to provide libraries for FreeBSD
and Linux via a build system based on autotools.
My problem is that the .so numbers get produced
differently on both systems.
E.g.
libburn.so.31 on FreeBSD
libburn.so.4.27.0 o
On 02/20/2009 11:40, David N wrote:
2009/2/21 Pathiakis, Paul:
Steven,
I'm going to start testing it in a pre-production environment. It seems
so straightforward, integrates with ZFS, it has simple configuration
files, all around, I'm hoping that it garners more
clustering/replication for Free
Would you mind if I need to know about the possibility of sybase_ase 15.0 on
FreeBSD?
May I have a reply?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-u
Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly bump
PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such precedents?
%%%
PORTVERSION=0.0.10${SNAPSUFFIX}
PORTEPOCH= 1
SNAPSUFFIX= .${SNAPTYPE}.${SNAPREV}
SNAPTYPE= git
SNAPREV=e09f50e
%%%
Where PKGNAME would
Hi,
Sam Lawrance wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/policies-shlib.html
That description is similar to what i experience
on my Linux system but not to what i see on the
FreeBSD server where i do my tests:
everest.free-shells.com.ar
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p5 (KEVEREST-
21 matches
Mail list logo
