Re: Xorg disaster

2009-02-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Diego Depaoli wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>I updated nvidia-driver to the latest version, and submitted a >> patch, but ran into issues with graphics/mesa-demos (until recently >> when someone fixed the build CFLAGS -- rn

[ports/127368: audio/last.fm: add a .desktop file for Xfce/GNOME/KDE] Maintainer timeout?

2009-02-15 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
Hi, Could some committer please take a look at the PR transcribed below? It was taken by amdmi3 on Sep 14 2008, but was never committed. Thanks in advance. -- My preferred quotation of Robert Louis Stevenson is "You cannot make an omelette without breaking eggs". Not because I like the omelette

Re: FreeBSD Port: ktorrent-3.1.6_1

2009-02-15 Thread Jonathan
Chuck Robey wrote: > I finally found an odd fix, not sure why it worked this way, but I thought to > pass it along on the hope that maybe it will work for you as well as it did > for > me. My max upload is about 38KBPS, my max download is about 160KBPS. I'd > set > for to -1, so that the u/d r

Re: FreeBSD Port: ktorrent-3.1.6_1

2009-02-15 Thread Nikolay Tychina
2009/2/13 Max Brazhnikov > > Do you mean 'Check data' for downloaded files? It gives me about 20Mb/s > I mean downloaded data checking, right. Download/upload speed is fine. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li

Re: FreeBSD Port: ktorrent-3.1.6_1

2009-02-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:21:32 +0300 Nikolay Tychina wrote: > Hello, > > i installed ktorrent3 and it seems to be very slow while checking > pieces. (~2mb per second) > (Deluge do it much more faster, i didn't try any other clients though) > Do you have the same problem? Do you have any particula

Re: FreeBSD Port: ktorrent-3.1.6_1

2009-02-15 Thread Jonathan
RW wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:21:32 +0300 > Nikolay Tychina wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> i installed ktorrent3 and it seems to be very slow while checking >> pieces. (~2mb per second) >> (Deluge do it much more faster, i didn't try any other clients though) >> Do you have the same problem? > >

lang/perl5.8 installation failure

2009-02-15 Thread bf
It seems that the latest changes to the lang/perl5.8 port (resulting in CVS revision 1.100 of the Makefile, in response to PR ports/131434: lang/perl5.8: suid fails) have broken the install target. I had to change lines 145 and 146 from: BSDPAN_VERSION=${PORTVERSION}_1 BSDPAN_WRKSRC= ${WR

FreeBSD Port: lang/perl5.8

2009-02-15 Thread Hilko Meyer
Hi, the installation of perl 5.8.9_1 fails here with the following error message: | /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN/. | install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.9/BSDPAN.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN/BSDPAN.pm | install: /usr/ports/lang/per

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

2009-02-15 Thread Dylan Leigh
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:32:13PM -0500, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > At any given time, approximately 20 - 25% of all ports are > unmaintained. Not all unmaintained ports need updating, but some do. > That is where you folks come in. > > There are a bunch of you out there who are subscribers to thi

Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/perl5.8

2009-02-15 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:15:49 +0100 Hilko Meyer wrote: > Hi, > > the installation of perl 5.8.9_1 fails here with the following error > message: > | /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN/. > | install -o root -g wheel -m > 444 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/BSDPAN-5.8.9/BSDPAN.pm > /us

Re: lang/perl5.8 installation failure

2009-02-15 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:13:43 -0800 (PST) bf wrote: > It seems that the latest changes to the lang/perl5.8 port (resulting > in CVS revision 1.100 of the Makefile, in response to PR ports/131434: > lang/perl5.8: suid fails) have broken the install target. > > I had to change lines 145 and 146 fro

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

2009-02-15 Thread chifeng
# cd /usr/ports/mail/ # grep -R 'po...@freebsd.org' * try this way. :) On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Dylan Leigh wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:32:13PM -0500, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > > At any given time, approximately 20 - 25% of all ports are > > unmaintained. Not all unmaintained por