I have to agree with you that this latest update was most problematic for me. I
keep my system very up-to-date, usually every 3-5 days. FreeBSD 7.1 RELENG
(Which is stable at the moment) on Toshiba X200-AX1
Two major problems both noted in UPDATING but still cause of a huge number of
problems w
Hello all
I am in the process of updating my system.
I have several entry’s in UPDATING
20090123:
AFFECTS: users of x11/libxcb
AUTHOR: f...@freebsd.org
Libxcb shared library version was bumped from 1 to 2. You need to
rebuild any consumer of libxcb.so.1 or some applicati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy Guys,
KDE 4.2 is more or less ready for testing, but we have some
open tasks before we will officially call for testing. We would
like to know how many people are still using KDE4 on FreeBSD 6.4?
We are considering dropping support for 6.x.
Let
I don't understand: instead of "dropping support" for 6.x, why don't
you just USE_GCC=4.x for 6.x if the problems are primarily due to
the older compiler?
Regards,
b.
P.S. Aren't you supposed to be on a long vacation? ;)
___
freebs
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Howdy Guys,
>
> KDE 4.2 is more or less ready for testing, but we have some
> open tasks before we will officially call for testing. We would
> like to know how many people are still using
Martin Wilke wrote:
> Howdy Guys,
>
> KDE 4.2 is more or less ready for testing, but we have some
> open tasks before we will officially call for testing. We would
> like to know how many people are still using KDE4 on FreeBSD 6.4?
> We are considering dropping support for 6.x.
>
> Let me explain
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:19:41 +, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
> making kde4 depend on gcc4.x an option for 6.4 ?
Then at least Qt4 should be build with gcc4 and may be all others kde deps.
Max
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:19:41 +
Masoom Shaikh wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Martin Wilke
> wrote:
> > Howdy Guys,
> >
> > KDE 4.2 is more or less ready for testing, but we have some
> > open tasks before we will officially call for testing. We would
> > like to know how many peopl
Hello,
I`ve got the problem with installing firefox3:
checking for DRIGL... gnome-config: not found
gnome-config: not found
configure: error: Package requirements (x11 xext xxf86vm xdamage xfixes
x11-xcb xcb-glx) were not met:
No package 'x11-xcb' found
No package 'xcb-glx' found
Consider ad
On Jan 21, 2009, at 8:34 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I committed this fix and a couple of other small ones for this port
tonight. Please let me know if you have any problems with it.
Why that, and not upgrade to 3.8.2?
Here's a patch to upgrade to 3.8.2, and optionally disables the
graphviz
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:35:02 -0600, Boris Samorodov wrote:
"Jeremy Messenger" writes:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:08 -0600, Boris Samorodov wrote:
"Jeremy Messenger" writes:
2. Create slave ports to build (non-default so far) packages for
those
who want to use packages and were unfort
Honestly, you can build graphviz without *any* X11 support. Right now
there's 90-something dependancies and it completely overrides
WITHOUT_X11. I'd like to see the maintainer pay attention to
WITHOUT_X11 and use the right configure flags with graphviz.
On Jan 23, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Domini
As a general note, this is the second time in a row that an X.org
upgrade broke X for a significant number of people. IMO, this
suggests that our approach to X.org upgrades needs significant changes
(see below). X11 is a critical component for anyone who is using
FreeBSD as a desktop and having u
Dnia piątek, 30 stycznia 2009, Maxx napisał:
> Hello,
>
> I`ve got the problem with installing firefox3:
>
> checking for DRIGL... gnome-config: not found
> gnome-config: not found
> configure: error: Package requirements (x11 xext xxf86vm xdamage
> xfixes x11-xcb xcb-glx) were not met:
>
> No pack
On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:
Here's a patch to upgrade to 3.8.2, and optionally disables the
graphviz requirement (90+ ports used only for a single graph).
FYI, this is PR131167
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131167
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> * Florent Thoumie (f...@xbsd.org) wrote:
>>
>>> > You are lucky guys you have not lived in USSR. otherwise you'd surely like
>>> > alternative ways :)
>>>
>>> In soviet russia, a
On Friday 26 December 2008 21:07:20 Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2008 20:06:37 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>>> It's because of this:
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-December/001264.html
>>
>> does someone have a patch handy that we can use to get around this
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 06:53:11AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> As a general note, this is the second time in a row that an X.org
> upgrade broke X for a significant number of people. IMO, this
> suggests that our approach to X.org upgrades needs significant changes
> (see below). X11 is a critic
,--- You/Peter (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:53:11 +1100) *
| X11 is a critical component for anyone who is using FreeBSD as a
| desktop and having upgrades fail or come with significant POLA
| violations and regressions for significant numbers of people is not
| acceptable.
Fully agree with this.
| I
Hello!
I think there are error in libXmu port(i think in Makefile or in list of
depends but not shure). comand
#cd /usr/ports/graphics/php5-gd && make
makes only error, that point to error of configuring libXmu.
#cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libXmu && make
makes error too. in error message were
,--- You/O. (Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:19:41 +0100) *
| After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4
| and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now
| firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this
| error message:
|
| Xlib
Hello,
I live in a place where the internet connection is
very, very slow, and i feel very enthusiastic about
freeBSD (i'm currently using Linux), therefore i
had a friend download about 16 GB of ports from
the official ports site, and i have them now in my
local network.
We are working on proj
On a fresh ports tree updated minutes ago with portsnap and a clean
workdir:
% cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/tinderbox
% make
===> Found saved configuration for tinderbox-3.1.2_2
===> Extracting for tinderbox-3.1.2_2
=> MD5 Checksum OK for tinderbox/tinderbox-3.1.2.tar.gz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for t
Maxx wrote at 20:53 +0300 on Jan 30, 2009:
> I`ve got the problem with installing firefox3:
>
> checking for DRIGL... gnome-config: not found
> gnome-config: not found
> configure: error: Package requirements (x11 xext xxf86vm xdamage xfixes
> x11-xcb xcb-glx) were not met:
>
> No packag
24 matches
Mail list logo
