2008/11/17 Rene Ladan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Rene Ladan schreef:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a patch[1] ready for the astro/boinc-setiathome-enhanced port to
>> update it to 6.03 (which is the same as 5.27 but with the science and
>> graphics code separated), and to add astropulse 4.28 (same as 4.35, bu
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:59:47AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> When you update your ports via csup (not sure about portsnap), the INDEX
> file **is not** updated.
portsnap does update the index.
--
Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-por
Hi!
QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64.
here is the report:
http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log
I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it looks
like and AMD64 problem.
Could someone with some amd64 hardware help me a little?
I'd
The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
Makefile:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/doc/cmucl/*
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
>
> The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not.
>
> How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
>
> Makefile:
> .if !defined(NOPOR
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
>
> The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist
> does not.
>
> How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes?
>
> Makefile:
> .i
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:04 +0100
Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64.
>
> here is the report:
>
> http://t64.tecnik93.com/logs/7-STABLE-FTP/traindirector-3.5.log
>
> I tried it on my machines but I can't see any problem on i386, it
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
[ .. ]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
> > Hi,
BTW, you got the same error in two other BotMails (at least):
From: [E
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes
>
> [ .. ]
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:57AM +0200:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:57:17PM +0200:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:05:28 -0500
> > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=y
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
>
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> > problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
> > FreeBSD-6
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:35:45 -0500
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
> > Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Cracauer wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:28:37PM +0200:
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:08:26 -0500
>> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
>>> pr
> >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
> >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
> >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/release/19e/
> >>>
> >>> The 6.3 will run everywhere. Should I just use that
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
> > >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x
> > >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/relea
Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> > > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for
> > > >>> FreeBSD-6.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> > > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this
> > > > >>> problem: i
Hi,
does anyone port Jdownloader (java app) to freebsd yet??
thanks!!
TFC
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:44:17 +0100
Gábor Kövesdán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoshihiro Ota escribió:
> > Hello, forks.
> >
> > There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following.
> >
> > % ls -d */*tomcat*
> > java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41
> > www/jakarta-tomcat4
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:13:24 -0500
"Tsu-Fan Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>does anyone port Jdownloader (java app) to freebsd yet??
Is there some specific problem with Jdownloader, which should
be platform independent, or are asking about a FreeBSD port (as
in /usr/ports)?
21 matches
Mail list logo
