># mailscanner -debug
>Fatal error 'Recurse on a private mutex.' at line 986 in file
/usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_mutex.c (errno = 0)
Not the slightest clue... perl with pthread enabled? I remember some
problems with earlier versions...
___
free
Hi,
after updating exim-4.69 to 4.69_1 with portmanager -u -l
I got the following new error messages:
failed to open DB file /var/spool/exim/db/wait-remote_lmtp: Inappropriate
file type or format
IPv6 socket creation failed: Protocol not supported
Exim runs in a jail, therefore there is no suppo
Problem with Mailscanner setup on FreeBSD 6.2/6.3
After doing some updates on my ports collection (clamav, Sqlite,
P5-IO-Net, and some others), mailscanner stopped working..
# mailscanner -debug
Fatal error 'Recurse on a private mutex.' at line 986 in file
/usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/t
I updated from 6-stable to 7-stable and got the following error
when portupgrading graphics/tiff...
.
.
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -L/usr/local/lib -o libtiffxx.la -rpath
/usr/local/lib -no-undefined -version-number 4:0:0 tif_s
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:06:04 -0600, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated from 6-stable to 7-stable and got the following error
when portupgrading graphics/tiff...
.
.
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -L/usr/local/lib -o li
John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is: is this documented and/or widely known? A full
> portupgrade wouldn't help if you were up to date on libtool in 6.x
> before updating (unless portupgrade -f is used).
But you've *always* needed to rebuild *all* your ports when system
lib
Lowell Gilbert wrote at 16:35 -0500 on Nov 13, 2008:
> John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So my question is: is this documented and/or widely known? A full
> > portupgrade wouldn't help if you were up to date on libtool in 6.x
> > before updating (unless portupgrade -f is used).
>
>
John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I often don't rebuild everything right away and live with the compat
> libs for a while.
>
> That has worked fine in the past (probably had some hiccups that I've
> long since forgotten about). But I understand why the official
> position is to rebuild ever
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:55:31 -0600, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote at 16:35 -0500 on Nov 13, 2008:
> John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So my question is: is this documented and/or widely known? A full
> > portupgrade wouldn't help if you were up to date on
A plea, since there currently appears to be a worldwide epidemic of
broken timepieces.
If you (that'd be the generic you) see a port "miraculously fail",
with something like the following in the configure output:
[...]
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -
10 matches
Mail list logo