Re: Call for testers: MythTV 0.21 port upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 31 October 2008 at 16:05:16 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote: >> I've been working on PR 126343 >> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/126343) to get MythTV >> upgraded to 0.21 on FreeBSD. > > Sorry for th

HEADS UP: mono update

Hi all, There is version 2.0.1 of lang/mono in the bsd# repo [0], wich works on i386 and AMD64. The idea is to upgrade lang/mono and the ports that depends on it, of the FreeBSD ports. It would be greate if anyone can help test thing out so no problems come after the upgrade (next week). Any fe

Re: devel/libcheck - fails: mtree

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:07:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > > The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on > 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" > and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the

Re: HEADS UP: mono update

Hi! On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:57:37AM -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > It would be greate if anyone can help test thing out so no problems come > after the upgrade (next week). I am trying to figure out what change between 1.2.5.1 and 1.2.6 made exception handling failing for a while but with no succes

ntop exits with sig 11 on 7.1

Hello, I just compiled a fresh copy of ntop on 7.1-PRERELEASE. i can run it and view data via the web interface for about a minute, after which the programs imply dies. --- Nov 4 12:05:13 router ntop[25092]: THREADMGMT[t135274752]: NPS(1): Started thread for network packet sniffing [bce0] Nov

devel/libcheck - fails: mtree

Hi, The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the following vars set: NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_

Re: HEADS UP: mono update

El mar, 04-11-2008 a las 05:42 -0800, mdh escribió: > Howdy, > Have you guys ever considered submitting your monodevelop port to the > main ports tree? If you need any help, I'm willing to assist. > > - mdh Sure, After the update the idea is to add new ports, like monodevelop, tasque, etc, wic

Re: [Fwd: Re: OpenOCD]

Bruce, I've been playing with your makefile for openocd. Awhile back I was told that the *right* way to do this as a real port was to get the svn, make a tgz in distfiles, and then build the port from that. Looks like you did the svn->distfiles part manually in your origonal makefile, right? I w