Hi!
We're still having Boost 1.34 in the ports tree and missed version 1.35 and
waited so long for a port version 1.36!
Sadly if it (will ever) arrive the ports tree it's not up to date then. So
what's up with this port at all?
Looking forward to see Boost 1.37 in the ports tree soon.
/Flex
___
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:12:08 +0100
Flex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We're still having Boost 1.34 in the ports tree and missed version
>1.35 and waited so long for a port version 1.36!
>Sadly if it (will ever) arrive the ports tree it's not up to date
>then. So what's up with this port at all?
>
>L
its surprisingly easier to install boost directly from tarball
probably he has lost interest or not able to find time,
I reminded him to update 1.35 then 1.36, it felt my mails were redirected to
/dev/null ;-)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Flex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're still h
> Hi!
>
> We're still having Boost 1.34 in the ports tree and missed version 1.35 and
> waited so long for a port version 1.36!
> Sadly if it (will ever) arrive the ports tree it's not up to date then. So
> what's up with this port at all?
>
> Looking forward to see Boost 1.37 in the ports tree s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:05:16 -0400
> Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I've been working on PR 126343
>> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/que
Has anyone experienced the compression of /usr/bin/gzip to /usr/bin/gzip.gz
during a portupgrade? Portupgrade obviously fails. As I use the -k option I
haven't been able to pin down what port actually causes the damage.
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FreeBSD UNIX: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Emanuel,
It's also disappoints me that there is only year-old boost library in ports
tree. I've already offered my help to Simon (see
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-September/050846.html).
I have time, equipment, experience and will for assisting in porting latest
stable boo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alexander Churanov wrote:
| Emanuel,
|
| It's also disappoints me that there is only year-old boost library in
ports
| tree. I've already offered my help to Simon (see
|
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-September/050846.html).
|
> It's also disappoints me that there is only year-old boost library in ports
> tree. I've already offered my help to Simon (see
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-September/050846.html).
> I have time, equipment, experience and will for assisting in porting latest
> stable boo
Hi there!!!
First of all have to say thank you all the ppl behind the ports tree. Great
work.
I would like to ask for any developer to make a port of qparted/gparted
utility:
Is that possible? Is someone already working on it?
Is out there any other simmilar application with that easy-to-use mi
Emanuel,
Copying devel/boost to devel/boost-devel sounds reasonable.
However, I'd like to suggest moving devel/boost to devel/boost-134 and
having devel/boost updated to 1.37. For me '-devel' is always felt like
something not stable enough. Another concern is that maintaners of ports
that depend
> Emanuel,
>
> Copying devel/boost to devel/boost-devel sounds reasonable.
>
> However, I'd like to suggest moving devel/boost to devel/boost-134 and
> having devel/boost updated to 1.37. For me '-devel' is always felt like
> something not stable enough. Another concern is that maintaners of port
Dear Thierry,
I am interested in the current state of openFoam 1.4.1(_?) on FreeBSD and am
willing to assist if able.
I have examined the various port status portals but I am unclear as to
whether difficulties I am currently experiencing are consistent with these,
or are up to date with cur
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:29:42 -0600, Emanuel Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Emanuel,
Copying devel/boost to devel/boost-devel sounds reasonable.
However, I'd like to suggest moving devel/boost to devel/boost-134 and
having devel/boost updated to 1.37. For me '-devel' is always felt like
som
hello anyone,
this game is old, but I just wanted to try to work out the online feature. do
you konw?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Could you please update tokyocabinet to the latest version, which
fixed some issues?
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Friday, 31 October 2008 at 16:05:16 -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
>
> I've been working on PR 126343
> (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/126343) to get MythTV
> upgraded to 0.21 on FreeBSD.
Sorry for the slow reply. I've been busy with other things, and
currently I'm not in a posit
18 matches
Mail list logo
