It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
Creating the package after this is just one command and a ftp upload to the
package
On Wed, October 29, 2008 9:09 am, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
> Creating the package after t
On Wed, October 29, 2008 9:09 am, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
> Creating the package after
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
> Creating the package
On Wed, October 29, 2008 9:53 am, joeb wrote:
> On Wed, October 29, 2008 9:09 am, FBSD1 wrote:
>> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
>> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
>> source of the software to test and verify the ch
On 10/29/08, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
> real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
> source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
Port maintainers usually ver
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:02:14PM +0800, joeb wrote:
> How does kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8 or php5-gd or pdflib fit into those
> reasons you gave?
> These all have ports but no package for many releases of Freebsd.
>
For print/pdflib it is legal restrictions. (The Makefile says
"RESTRICTED= m
Hi,
I'm struggling to make kopete connect to the MSN service on a FreeBSD
7.1BETA2 system with KDE4.
The following debug log occurs when trying to issue a connect:
kopete(1370)/kopete (msn) MSNAccount::setOnlineStatus: "Online"
kopete(1370)/kopete (msn - raw protocol) MSNSocket::slotReadyWrite:
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trulsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:47 PM
To: FBSD1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ports missing their packages.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> It's my understanding that
On Wed 2008-10-29 04:42:18 UTC-0500, Scot Hetzel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So you are advocating that port maintainers have to create packages
> for all the supported FreeBSD architecture's (amd64, arm, i386, ia64,
> mips, pc98, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v). That would be 9 packages
> needing to b
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ports missing their packages.
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 4:09 AM
> It's my understanding that a port maintainer has
Hello,
AFAIK this is a known problem, and it's already reported in the kde
bugtracker.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:58:57 +0100 (CET)
"Kenneth Karoliussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm struggling to make kopete connect to the MSN service on a FreeBSD
> 7.1BETA2 system with KDE4.
>
> T
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:42:18AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> So you are advocating that port maintainers have to create packages
> for all the supported FreeBSD architecture's (amd64, arm, i386, ia64,
> mips, pc98, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v). That would be 9 packages
> needing to be created at the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
> An alternate solution to this problem is to allow users to upload missing
> packages
one word for you: "security".
What you suggest is never, ever, going to be implemented, due to the
total lack of security.
mcl
___
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:02:14PM +0800, joeb wrote:
> How does kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8 or php5-gd or pdflib fit into those
> reasons you gave?
A little research shows:
ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/php5-gd-5.2.6_2.tbz
So, there is a current package for ph
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00:50PM +1100, andrew clarke wrote:
> Presumably the 6.x series wlll be retired before 8.x is released... :)
No, there will be an overlap. See
http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html#supported-branches.
8.0 had *better* be out before 2010 :-)
> That brings up a que
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:17:22AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00:50PM +1100, andrew clarke wrote:
> > Presumably the 6.x series wlll be retired before 8.x is released... :)
>
> No, there will be an overlap. See
> http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html#supported-br
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:55:20AM -0700, mdh wrote:
> email the FreeBSD Foundation and find out how much cash it'd take for
> additional hardware to make that a reality, then send them that much cash.
We are actually set up ok on amd64 machines right now (incremental
package builds take just ov
Dear Sir(s),
I would like to bring your attention to a problem in the scripts
in the tovid package.
tovid uses mplayer to identify characteristics of a video.
mplayer uses $home/.mplayer/config as its config file.
IF $home/.mplayer/config has an entry 'loop = 0' then
tovid/makexml/idvid scripts
On 2008-Oct-29 10:22:36 -0500, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We also have some sparc64 machines that are on loan to us, which I am
>also in the process of configuration, but these are only UltraSPARC-II
>machines. There seems to be some work going on right now to get us
>running on US-I
Fixed using easy_install.
Thanks
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I have set
PYTHON_VERSION= 2.5
in my make.conf. This is the only thing that comes to mind as a
possible reason.
pkg_info -g py25-zsi-2.0,1
pkg_info:
/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI-2.0-py2.5.egg-info
doesn't exist
On 2008-Oct-29 16:09:23 +0800, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for
>real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the
>source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted.
I'm not sure wh
22 matches
Mail list logo
