FreeBSD Port: gtkyahoo-0.18.3_4

I installed the package of this port. Did a rehash from the command line and then startx. Can't find it in the gnome desktop. What should I do? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsub

Re: FreeBSD Port: gtkyahoo-0.18.3_4

> I installed the package of this port. > Did a rehash from the command line and then startx. > Can't find it in the gnome desktop. > What should I do? The sourceforge page for this project says "GTKyahoo project was closed down on February 27, 2003." http://gtkyahoo.sourceforge.net/ You may hav

Re: portupgrade fails - how to fix?

Hello, On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Chris Timmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was having the same problem with portupgrade-devel 2.4.6; removing that > and installing a package I had saved of: > >portupgrade-devel-2.4.3_1 > > resolved the issue for me. I believe ports-mgmt/portd

Re: ports/17882: New version of healthd

Synopsis: New version of healthd Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->wxs Responsible-Changed-By: wxs Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 23 20:18:35 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=17882

Re: Portupgrade -- sshguard compile failure

andrew clarke wrote: On Sat 2008-10-04 07:11:05 UTC-0700, David Southwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: cd .. && /bin/sh /usr/ports/security/sshguard/work/sshguard-1.2/missing --run autoheader aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. This was fixed in sshguard 1.3. Upda

linux-glib2 not conflicting with linux_base-f8

I noticed that linux-glib2 is being installed even though it is in conflict with linux_base-f8. Suggested changes: 1. Add a '-*' to each conflict in devel/linux-glib2/Makefile. 2. Remove devel/linux-glib2 from x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 at least for fedora-fc6 and higher. Sean -- [EMAIL PROTECTE

Concern about using pkg_delete -r

I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the proper list. I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed port, but also want to remove its orphaned dependencies along with it. After looking at the pkg_delete(1

Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r

Josh Rickmar wrote: I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the proper list. I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed port, but also want to remove its orphaned dependencies along with it. After looki

Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r

On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:05 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Josh Rickmar wrote: > >> I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual >> discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the >> proper list. >> >> I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed

Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r

On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:30 pm, Robert Noland wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 22:25 -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote: > >> On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:05 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> >>> Josh Rickmar wrote: >>> >>> I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual dis

Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r

On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 22:25 -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote: > On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:05 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > Josh Rickmar wrote: > > > >> I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual > >> discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the > >>

Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r

On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 22:41 -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote: > On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:30 pm, Robert Noland wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 22:25 -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote: > > > >> On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:05 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> > >>> Josh Rickmar wrote: > >>> > >>> > I