On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:30:54 -0700
Michael Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> OK, I re-checked the source files - the .bz2 file was actually
> truncated on the main server, so I regenerated it and put the
> resulting file up (which also has a different MD5 sum now...)
The problem should be solv
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Greetings again. I'm not sure if this request should be done to this
mailing list or as a PR, but here goes.
I run FreeBSD as a server, not as a desktop. Some of my users want
Emacs. If I pull down the prebuilt binary, it requires a zillon
X11-related packages that are of no use on my system.
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
On 9/7/08, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings again. I'm not sure if this request should be done to this mailing
> list or as a PR, but here goes.
>
> I run FreeBSD as a server, not as a desktop. Some of my users want Emacs.
> If I pull down the prebuilt binary, it requires a zill
At 11:36 AM -0500 9/7/08, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 9/7/08, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings again. I'm not sure if this request should be done to this mailing
list or as a PR, but here goes.
I run FreeBSD as a server, not as a desktop. Some of my users want Emacs.
If I pull d
Hello,
recently i upgraded my FreeBSD 6.2/amd64 box from samba 3.0.25a to the
latest port version (i always try to do this every few weeks).
Since 3.0.26 i discovered that after a while the system consumes approx
90% with a few samba threads.
due to this performance bottleneck i have to "killal
On Friday 05 September 2008 09:16:23 you wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 September 2008 09:38:22 you wrote:
> >> David Southwell wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 02 September 2008 08:26:26 you wrote:
> Show please an output of the command:
> pkg_info -o apache-2.2.9
> >>>
> >>>
Hi.
Please note:
=> vim-7.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/vim.
=> Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unix/.
fetch: http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/unix/vim-7.2.tar.bz2: size mismatch:
expected 7203720, actual 7203291
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
"/usr/share/mk/sys.mk", line 357: Could not find bsd.cpu.mk
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
===> x11-clocks/asclock-gtk failed
*** Erro
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
It appears to me from 7-STABLE, that there is a conflict between sitecopy
and subversion as that sitecopy insists on neon26 and subversion requires
neon28.
--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266
14 matches
Mail list logo
