Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES
Kris Kennaway wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOC
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Kris Kennaway said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > The build which triggered this email is done under
> > tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with
> > tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" and ccache support,
> > with the "official" up-to-date Po
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:00:13 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> The build which triggered this email is done under
> >> tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs
> >> -plistcheck -onceo
Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008, Kris Kennaway said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under
tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with
tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" and ccache support,
with the "official" up-to-date Ports
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:29:52 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:00:13 +0200
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > These ports are unmaintained are the mails just spam the list.
> >
> > ^
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:30:50 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 August 2008, Kris Kennaway said:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The build which triggered this email is done under
> >>> tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on am
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
* Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> These ports are unmaintained are the mails just spam the list.
>> I think the general idea is that someone will take notice and step up
>> and fix it.
> Sounds more like a hope to me :) We don't even consistently get people
> fixing the unmaintai
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi Mike,
It seems that this port is outdated and doesn't allow to be build
anymore since the current version is 5.1. See:
http://go6.net/4105/download.asp
Regards,
Tames.
Tames van der Does
Systems Engineer
CCIE Security #9652
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile :+31 6 22408224
Cisco Syst
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Tames van der Does (tdoes) writes:
> It seems that this port is outdated and doesn't allow to be build
> anymore since the current version is 5.1. See:
> http://go6.net/4105/download.asp
By which I take it you mean "is no longer available from the
vendor", because 5.0.2 copiled succe
Hi Robert,
Yes, correct. I should have given you the error message I received:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/ports/net/gateway6# make
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=> gw6c-5_0-RELEASE-src.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/di
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:18:35 +0200
"Pav Lucistnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:03:21 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote
>
> > Is anyone experimenting problems building sysutils/lsof in 8.0-
> > CURRENT ? It seems for me that this port is currently broken, but I
> > wanted to
Etienne Robillard píše v ne 24. 08. 2008 v 16:03 -0400:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:18:35 +0200
> "Pav Lucistnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:03:21 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote
> >
> > > Is anyone experimenting problems building sysutils/lsof in 8.0-
> > > CURRENT ? It
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 05:05:41PM +0200, Tames van der Does (tdoes) wrote:
> It seems that this port is outdated and doesn't allow to be build
> anymore since the current version is 5.1. See:
> http://go6.net/4105/download.asp
Why does this port exist? It's available as net/freenet6 since 2001.
This game does not properly install the audio files, resulting in an
error when the game is launched.
Manually copying the audio files from sounds to the path it expects
these files to be allows the game to be played.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m
37 matches
Mail list logo