On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
>
> 2008/7/22 Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Okalany Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Jul 19,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why has committing a patch gotten so complicated?
One day since the last update to the PR... The PR responsible recently
got repository privileges so he's probably getting familiar to the
procedures.
While I'm lookin
This is something the PR responsible introduced in his original patch...
On 23.7.2008, at 10:14, Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why has committing a patch gotten so complicated?
One day since the last update to the PR...
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is something the PR responsible introduced in his original patch...
It's still present in your version. Anyway, I'm not blaming anyone,
just pointing out what I think is a mistake.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is something the PR responsible introduced in his original
> > patch...
>
> It's still present in your version. Anyway, I'm n
M. L. Dodson wrote:
M. L. Dodson wrote:
I am the maintainer of biology/nab and asked that it be marked
deprecated several months ago. I just filed a PR to have it removed.
Nab has been superseded by AmberTools (also by the nab developers). I
have the current version of AmberTools building wit
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Another problem with ports is that all of them like pulling the
> original source from the author's site. I've had a few where the
> author released the code under GPL then a few years later lost
> interest, stopped paying whateve
cpghost wrote:
Why not add this to pointyhat scripts? Just upload a copy of every
*new* distfile ever encountered from the author's page to freebsd
(unless there are legal constraints not to do so, of course)?
Some might say that this already happens.
Well, it's on ftp.freebsd.org rather than
cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Another problem with ports is that all of them like pulling the
original source from the author's site. I've had a few where the
author released the code under GPL then a few years later lost
interest, stopped payi
Matthew Seaman wrote:
cpghost wrote:
Why not add this to pointyhat scripts? Just upload a copy of every
*new* distfile ever encountered from the author's page to freebsd
(unless there are legal constraints not to do so, of course)?
Some might say that this already happens.
Well, it's on ftp.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
> "Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > This is something the PR responsible introduced
Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is something the PR responsibl
Florent Thoumie wrote:
I'll do a swap on the tree for it, because I'm sure there are more
ports doing something like:
Do you have thoughts on this use of it ?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/125657
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailin
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florent Thoumie wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
>>> "Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Wed, J
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Okalany Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
>>
>>> 2008/7/22 Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Okalany Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 22, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
>>>
>
James Tanis wrote:
"cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ports would still go to the primary sites (to conserve bandwidth),
but should the original distfile disappear, it would be still available
on freebsd.
I think his problem comes from the fact that some ports don't do this, not
that it
"cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ports would still go to the primary sites (to conserve bandwidth),
> but should the original distfile disappear, it would be still available
> on freebsd.
I think his problem comes from the fact that some ports don't do this, not
that it isn't a good idea
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:51:10 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cpghost wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >> Another problem with ports is that all of them like pulling the
> >> original source from the author's site. I've had a few where
cpghost wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:51:10 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cpghost wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Another problem with ports is that all of them like pulling the
original source from the author's site. I've had a few w
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:06:36 +0200
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cpghost wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:51:10 +0200
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> cpghost wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Another problem w
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:13:58 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100
"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:3
Dear maintainer,
I have noticed that most time of 'make index' on my system takes a grep for
libssl.
The following is done while 'make index' was running.
$ ps axww | grep libssl
23119 p1 IN+0:00,00 sh -c grep -l -r "^lib/libssl.so." "/var/db/pkg" |
while read contents; do sslprefix=`gr
V.Chukharev wrote:
Dear maintainer,
I have noticed that most time of 'make index' on my system takes a grep for
libssl.
The following is done while 'make index' was running.
$ ps axww | grep libssl
23119 p1 IN+0:00,00 sh -c grep -l -r "^lib/libssl.so." "/var/db/pkg" | while read content
Hi folks,
recently a number of rubygem ports started installing dependent gems on
the pointyhat cluster. Mostly it's about rubyforge-1.0.0.
I have no idea what's going on. Could some of you look into it and point
out the change that caused this behavior?
Sample failure logs:
http://pointyhat.Fr
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi folks,
recently a number of rubygem ports started installing dependent gems on
the pointyhat cluster. Mostly it's about rubyforge-1.0.0.
I have no idea what's going on. Could some of you look into it and point
out the change that caused this behavior?
Sample failure log
I've just run into this upgrading Gnome to 2.22.3:
===> Configuring for ekiga-2.0.11_4
/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e
"s,PWLIB_REC_VERSION=.*,PWLIB_REC_VERSION=`ptlib-config --version`,"
-e "s,OPAL_REC_VERSION=.*,OPAL_REC_VERSION=`/usr/bin/awk '/define
OPAL_VERSION/ {printf $NF}'
/usr/local/incl
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I've just run into this upgrading Gnome to 2.22.3:
===> Configuring for ekiga-2.0.11_4
/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e
"s,PWLIB_REC_VERSION=.*,PWLIB_REC_VERSION=`ptlib-config --version`,"
-e "s,OPAL_REC_VERSION=.*,OPAL_REC_VERSION=`/usr/bin/awk '/define
OPAL_VERSION/ {printf
Latest upgrade of policy kit
# $FreeBSD: ports/sysutils/policykit/Makefile,v 1.14 2008/07/24 01:52:29
marcus Exp $
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src -I../../src
-DPACKAGE_LIBEXEC_DIR=\"/usr/local/libexec\"
-DPACKAGE_SYSCONF_DIR=\"/usr/local/etc\"
-DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\"/usr/local/share
David Southwell wrote:
Latest upgrade of policy kit
Remove the patch-src_kit_kit-string.c file.
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
30 matches
Mail list logo
