Following error message:
===> Patching for ruby18-gems-1.2.0
===> ruby18-gems-1.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby18-gems-1.2.0
=> Patch patch-lib-rubygems-source_info_cache.rb failed to apply cleanly.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/
FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# pkg_info |grep gcc
gcc-4.1.3_20080630 GNU Compiler Collection 4.1
gcc-4.2.5_20080702 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2
gccmakedep-1.0.2Create depende
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 July 2008 02:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64
>
> Following error message:
> ===>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
> 09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> # pkg_info |grep gcc
> gcc-4.1.3_20080630 GNU Compiler Collection 4.1
> gcc-4
The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems.
Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already?
David
I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
http://twitter.com/jweiss
___
freebsd-po
Hi,
While building firefox the make process just stops and do not proceede.
The last process that does not exit (still running - after more than
30min) is actually shlibsign:
(I try to compile version 3.0.1)
---:<
[...]
cd mangle; /usr/local/bin/gm
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:24:18PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Kostik Belousov пишет:
> >Using the portupgrade 2.4.6 from stable port, I used the
> >WITH_GECKO="firefox"
> >in the MAKE_ARGS. And, below is the output of the portupgrade. Note
> >quoting.
> >
> >---> Installing the new version
A fix was commited.
Jonathan
Jonathan Weiss wrote:
The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems.
Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already?
David
I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
http://twitter.com/jweiss
_
I updated ports on one of our web servers today and discovered that
webalizer is suddenly a lot different.
A couple of days ago the port was upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.20.1.
- command line switches have changed
- configuration file options have changed
- defaults have changed
Nothing in /usr/ports
John Marshall wrote:
I updated ports on one of our web servers today and discovered that
webalizer is suddenly a lot different.
A couple of days ago the port was upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.20.1.
- command line switches have changed
- configuration file options have changed
- defaults have changed
--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states:
July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop in
replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional changes required, and
all
On Monday 21 July 2008 04:27:58 Jonathan Weiss wrote:
> > The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems.
> > Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already?
> > David
>
> I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it.
>
> Jonathan
OK just csup ports-all -- your new patch fixes the problem.
On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Eric Zimmerman wrote:
thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states:
July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop
in replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional changes
required, and all users are encouraged to upgrade when
I'm not sure if it's porttools at fault here or my own system (or even where I
have my files), but it seems like every other time I run a 'port test' on a
port, the permissions on the files being extracted are coming out wrong. For
instance, configure scripts are lacking their +x, even though t
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states:
July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a
drop in
replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional chan
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:25:52PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:06:02 -0500, Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I was trying to modify the VLC port to enable the Firefox plugin, but
> >when I added firefox3 to the list of USE_GECKO and tried to build the
Hey,
I'm running 7.0-RELEASE, i386, and KDE 3.5.8/Qt 3.3.8 from ports.
Trying to install /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt gives this error:
...
-- Creating pyqtconfig.py...
/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++|
share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX =
c
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, 11:23 -0600, Eric Zimmerman wrote:
> Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>any idea what command line options changed based on your experience? I
> >>didnt
> >>see mention of command line changes
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
>> 09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
19 matches
Mail list logo
