Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26

2008-06-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote: > Hello, > > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is > ther

devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Jyun-Yi Liou
Hi list! I cant build devel/gio-fam-backend while I wana upgrade irc/bitlbee from 1.0.2 to 1.2 the compile error message below: ===> Building for gio-fam-backend-2.16.3 /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"GLib-GIO\" -I../.. -I../../glib -I../../gmodule -I../../gio -D

Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Steven Hartland
You need to upgrade all your ports as gnome has been updated, caught us out too. See: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq222.html Regards Steve - Original Message - From: "Jyun-Yi Liou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 1:18 PM Subj

Re: Wine 1.0-rc3 failed build

2008-06-04 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Naram Qashat wrote: > I just updated my ports tree which included the update of Wine to > 1.0-rc3. I attempted to build it and it failed at this point: Thanks for the report. I have tried to go for the upstream fix, but that seems to depend on other changes and thus is not a

Re: [phing] Updated FreeBSD Phing Port

2008-06-04 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Fri, 30 May 2008 17:11:35 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > Normally I would say that this PR may be approaching the point where we > override the maintainer No problem from me. -- Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // S2 Factory, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc. __

Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Jyun-Yi Liou
Thanks for this hint, Steve! but I am confused why bitlbee depends on devel/gio-fam-backend I can install bitlbee from source tarbal without gio-fam-backend (juust ./configure, gmake, gmake install) because of "USE_GNOME= glib20" in irc/bitlbee/Makefile? Regards, jyuny1 2008/6/4 Steven Hartland

Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Steven Hartland
Correct, tbh it really should detect the updated requirement better than it does. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: "Jyun-Yi Liou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks for this hint, Steve! but I am confused why bitlbee depends on devel/gio-fam-backend I can install bitlbee from

Re: Wine 1.0-rc3 failed build

2008-06-04 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Thanks for the report. I have tried to go for the upstream fix, but > that seems to depend on other changes and thus is not applicable for > the current Wine snapshot (rc3) though I verified that current upstream > sources work with that. > > I am curre

portupgrade complains "Makefile possibly broken"

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Stuyts
Hi, Recently I'm having problems upgrading my ports: # portupgrade -Raisbk ---> Session started at: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:16:21 +0200 [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 210 packages found (-3 +0) (...) done] ** Makefile possibly broken: print/ghostscript-gpl-nox11: "/usr/ports/print/g

Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > Correct, tbh it really should detect the updated requirement better than it > does. Meaning what? For information, irc/bitlbee only depends on devel/gio-fam-backend due to the following line in Mk/bsd.gnome.mk: glib20_RUN_DEPEND

UIM and m17n - m17n languages won't show up

2008-06-04 Thread Dan Reinholz
Unfortunately I'm not exactly sure when the problem began, but I am imagining it has happened with the update to the latest version of uim and associated libraries. When I run uim none of the languages supplied by m17n are listed. I also cannot find anyway to turn them on using the gtk preference

Re: portmaster and restarting of upgraded daemons

2008-06-04 Thread Doug Barton
Miroslav Lachman wrote: I am almost new to portmaster, so I got a question - is there any possibility to restart installed services as in portupgrade with defined BEFOREBUILD / BEFOREDEINSTALL / AFTERINSTALL? Or is there any future plan to do so? It is annoying if I end up with some dead servic

Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Henrik Brix Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: Correct, tbh it really should detect the updated requirement better than it does. Meaning what? Meaning if it depends on a specific version of anothe

Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26

2008-06-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
(Seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote: > > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon > > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion > > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile

Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26

2008-06-04 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon > > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion > > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is > > there

Re: Seg Fault: Xchat (on run)

2008-06-04 Thread Edwin Groothuis
> Not which list to post this to so figured I would start here. The > problem I have am is xchat segfaults on me right after I start it. Did > not have the problem on 6.2 or 6.3 but doesn't seem to like 7.0-BETA4 > ... anybody have any ideas? Rebuild lang/perl5.8 with WITHOUT_PERL_MALLOC=1 in yo

Re: devel/gio-fam-backend build faild

2008-06-04 Thread Sahil Tandon
Steven Hartland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Henrik Brix Andersen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >>> Correct, tbh it really should detect the updated requirement >>> better than it does. >> >> Meaning w

Re: portmaster and restarting of upgraded daemons

2008-06-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:22:56 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Miroslav Lachman wrote: And last question - /etc/portmaster.rc - is it realy right place according to man hier? I would expect it in /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc. You're absolutely right. I copied the code for thi

Re: Seg Fault: Xchat (on run)

2008-06-04 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:10:26 -0500, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not which list to post this to so figured I would start here. The problem I have am is xchat segfaults on me right after I start it. Did not have the problem on 6.2 or 6.3 but doesn't seem to like 7.0-BETA4 ... an

Re: portupgrade complains "Makefile possibly broken"

2008-06-04 Thread Philipp Ost
Ben Stuyts wrote: [snipped] This is on 7-stable, amd64, everything updated just over an hour ago. I see this on i386 (don't know when it began, perhaps a week ago...), too. I'm also running 7-STABLE. Philipp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l

Re: portmaster and restarting of upgraded daemons

2008-06-04 Thread Doug Barton
Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:22:56 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Miroslav Lachman wrote: And last question - /etc/portmaster.rc - is it realy right place according to man hier? I would expect it in /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc. You're absolutely right. I

(no subject)

2008-06-04 Thread chathura sadaruwan
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"