Re: archivers/lzo2 selftest is a little much...?

2008-05-31 Thread Matthias Andree
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Chuck Swiger wrote: > I'm all for having software do a sanity check before being used, but the > recent update to archivers/lzo2 (lzo2-2.03) generates some ~28,000+ lines > of output. Please consider a change like: > > --- ports/archivers/lzo2/Makefile~Fri May 30 18:33:

FreeBSD Port: webmin-1.420_1

2008-05-31 Thread Mark
Hi, Just an FYI for a problem I ran in to with the Webmin port: I've just installed a fresh version of 7-Stable, using pretty much the default options on a fairly standard new i386 box. I installed Webmin from the ports, but the Disk & Filesystem module gives an error (this is used whenever you l

Re: CFT: adding configuration file support to pkg_install

2008-05-31 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Florent Thoumie wrote: This adds support for /etc/pkg.conf configuration file. Also, this adds support for naive multi-site package fetching. Any comment welcome (and appreciated). Patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/pkg-install-config.diff Tarball is here: http://people.

Re: Trying for a duplex printer

2008-05-31 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-May-07 05:25:04 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:43:08PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: >>1) I can't determine which (if any) of the PIPS ports support the RX680, and ... >>2) right now, none of them build because of an error you get about a >> linuxwr

Re: CFT: adding configuration file support to pkg_install

2008-05-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Florent Thoumie wrote: This adds support for /etc/pkg.conf configuration file. Also, this adds support for naive multi-site package fetching. Any comment welcome (and appreciated). Patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/pkg-install-config.diff Tar

Re: CFT: adding configuration file support to pkg_install

2008-05-31 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Kris Kennaway wrote: packages are usually built from the ports tree, but not always, and users may use packages without a ports tree present on the local system. short of doing pkg_delete -af then pkg_add /some/dir are there any ports-mgmt/* tools for upgrades that don't need the ports tree pre

Re: CFT: adding configuration file support to pkg_install

2008-05-31 Thread Sahil Tandon
Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> packages are usually built from the ports tree, but not always, and users >> may use packages without a ports tree present on the local system. > short of doing pkg_delete -af then pkg_add /some/dir > are there any ports-mgmt

[patch] ghostscript-gpl: don't link against libiconv

2008-05-31 Thread Helge Oldach
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Helge Oldach >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] ghostscript-gpl: don't link against libiconv >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 6.3-1230 i38