on 22/04/2008 22:41 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ.
>
> Is there a tool for purely package-based management of third-party software?
> That is, something that meets the following criteria:
> 1. doesn't require ports tree
> 2. works similarly to packa
Quoting Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:46:38 +0300):
on 24/04/2008 09:02 Alexander Leidinger said the following:
Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 23 Apr 2008
15:39:17 +0200):
Andriy Gapon píše v st 23. 04. 2008 v 16:35 +0300:
BTW, strange thi
Andriy Gapon píše v čt 24. 04. 2008 v 09:43 +0300:
> on 23/04/2008 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > but I still want to keep ports for things that I'd rather customize myself.
> > But for the sake of experiment I will try mv-ing ports of the way and
> > see what happens.
>
> For the reco
do I just need to update my sources and build a kernel or do I need to
buildworld?
I hope it is just a build kernel because I get stuck on merge master
after build world, I don't understand the questions it asks
Thank you for your help
Sam Fourman Jr.
___
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:57:14AM +0800, Ching Hsien Ho wrote:
> Why don't you update this port for long time?
Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand
that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be
updating asap.
--
Lars Balker Rasmussen
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 22/04/2008 22:41 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ.
> >
> > Is there a tool for purely package-based management of third-party
> software?
> > That is, something that me
Shaun Amott wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0)
version? Latest release was about 1 month ago:
http://www.process-one.net/en/news/article/ejabberd_200_has_been_released/
Otherw
on 24/04/2008 12:14 Andy Kosela said the following:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> on 22/04/2008 22:41 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> > Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ.
>> >
>> > Is there a tool for purely package-based management o
On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't
understand
that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be
Is this script something you can share? I maintain about 10 perl
modules for ports and i
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:33:27AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>
>> Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand
>> that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be
>
> Is this script some
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
It may be overkill but in the past I have run ports-mgmt/portscout to
check for updated versions of ports. I have not run it looking for
perl
That does seem overkill! Thanks for the pointer.
_
Vivek Khera (Thu 04/24/08 10:33):
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
>
>> Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand
>> that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be
>
> Is this script something you can share? I mai
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:06:57PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
>
>> It may be overkill but in the past I have run ports-mgmt/portscout to
>> check for updated versions of ports. I have not run it looking for perl
>
> That does seem overkill!
Hello, I've been using pound for quite a while, first thank you for maintaining
this port.
After portupgrading to the latest version, it seems to be sending a 302 to all
requests I expect it to proxy https://mail.guardianchem.ca/owa to my BE server
at http://10.0.0.2/owa, in IE I just get a Int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:02:51AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:33:27AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
> >
> >> Because my check-updated-modules script was reta
Hi,
I just started using ports, did a `make package-recursive' on
shells/bash and got this:
(...)
===> Compressing manual pages for bash-3.2.33
===> Registering installation for bash-3.2.33
===> Building package for bash-3.2.33
Creating package /var/tm
16 matches
Mail list logo
