On Mar 2, 2008, at 23:50, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
package. With previous versions the created packages went into /usr/
ports/packages/All. However the packages directory was not c
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with them
without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or portconfig-recursive
from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gpl that open an ncurses dialogue between
configure and build stage very annoying. They ar
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
> them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
> portconfig-recursive from bsdadminscripts.
>
> But I find ports like ghostscript-gpl t
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
portconfig-recursive from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gp
Hi
Hi I have been out of commission for some time due to some health problems.
When to ujpgrade and received the forllowing error message
can anyone please advise?
Thanks
david
# portupgrade -a
Stale dependency: amavisd-new-2.5.3,1 --> p5-DBD-mysql-4.006 -- manually
run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:27:31 -0500
Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
> > Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
> >> them without trouble by setting BATCH, usi
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:27:31 -0500
> Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > RW wrote:
> > > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
> > > Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I don't mind ports that use the config framewor
Naram Qashat wrote:
>
> I believe a good example of what he might be talking about is the jdk
> ports.
> Because of the licensing of those ports, they will bring up an EULA that
> you
> need to read and then type "yes" afterwards. Even with BATCH set, it
> still
> stops at that EULA.
>
Wit
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:50 -0500
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
> > IIRC these ports refuse to fetch the distfiles, and ask you to
> > fetch them manually from the websites, where you have to agree to
> > the terms, they aren't act
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework. You can deal with
them without trouble by setting BATCH, using portmaster or
portconfig-recursive from bsdadminscripts.
But I find ports like ghostscript-gp
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:36:57PM +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:27:50 -0500
> Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
>
> > > IIRC these ports refuse to fetch the distfiles, and ask you to
> > > fetch them manually from the w
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote:
> With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the files, which
> is even more irritating
Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is your suggestion?
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take that as a bug report :-)
Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH. And does
BATCH apply to package install as well?
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:39:54 -0800
Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2008, at 23:50, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>
> > On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
> >> package. With previous versions the cre
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:43, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 00:39:54 -0800
Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 2, 2008, at 23:50, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
pack
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
>
>> I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
>> /etc/mail/mailer.conf.
>
> I'll take that as a bug report :-)
I didn't intend for that to be a bug report. :)
>
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:04:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:27:31 -0500
Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't mind ports that use the config framework.
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
/etc/mail/mailer.conf.
I'll take that as a bug report :-)
Though I'm not sure which way it should default, on BATCH. And does
BATCH apply to package install as wel
On Monday 03 March 2008, Mark Linimon said:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote:
> > With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the
> > files, which is even more irritating
>
> Given Sun's licensing requirements, what is your suggestion?
--
--
On Monday 03 March 2008, Beech Rintoul said:
> On Monday 03 March 2008, Mark Linimon said:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:12:37AM -0800, pjd wrote:
> > > With me the JDK ports stop and demand I manually download the
> > > files, which is even more irritating
> >
> > Given Sun's licensing requiremen
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:33:00 -0500
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >
> >> I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
> >> /etc/mail/mailer.conf.
> >
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:01:00 -0500
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Shields wrote:
>
> > I know mail/postfix asks if it should activate itself in
> > /etc/mail/mailer.conf.
>
> I'll take that as a bug report :-)
>
> Though I'm not sure which way it
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
> > Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters'
> >> Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one.
> >
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RW wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100
Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters'
Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one.
Setting BATC
On 3/3/08, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Hi I have been out of commission for some time due to some health problems.
> When to ujpgrade and received the forllowing error message
>
> can anyone please advise?
>
> Thanks
>
> david
>
> # portupgrade -a
> Stale dependency:
26 matches
Mail list logo
