Hi,
I just noticed that darkbot port won't install on my FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE
because of the "GNU_CONFIGURE= yes" line in its Makefile.
After commenting the line, it works perfectly BUT the script file "Adduser"
is missing and needed in /usr/local/etc/darkbot (the configure script calls
it at
Quoting Renato Pesca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:33:06
-0300 (BRT)):
Dear Port Maintainer,
I would like to know if there is some chance of Icc Port is available
for amd64 architecture.
No port for amd64 is available and I don't know about someone working on one.
Bye,
Alexa
Steven Hartland wrote:
Seems portupgrade can easily break the perl install.
How? Well there are various modules which can be updated
but are also part of the base perl and are hence required.
A good example of this is ExtUtils::MakeMaker. If you
uninstall any version of this port your done for,
Hi,
I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
apache-2.0.63
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! www/apache20 (apache-2.0.63) (Argument must be String c
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 14:53 +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> > Seems portupgrade can easily break the perl install.
> >
> > How? Well there are various modules which can be updated
> > but are also part of the base perl and are hence required.
> >
> > A good example of this
Hi,
when trying to upgrade security/gnutls the build process just hangs:
-8<-
/bin/sh /usr/ports/security/gnutls/work/gnome-libtool --tag=CC--mode=link
cc -std=gnu99 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_REE
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I think something is not quite right in your analysis, because perl
does not depend on any external perl modules (it cannot, by definition).
I ran into something like this when I was switching from a threaded perl
to an unthreaded perl. It wasn't possible to just use a po
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think something is not quite right in your analysis, because perl does
not depend on any external perl modules (it cannot, by definition).
I know what your saying there Kris, this shouldn't happen. So I've
spent some t
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:54:04 -0600, Mark Nowiasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
when trying to upgrade security/gnutls the build process just hangs:
-8<-
/bin/sh /usr/ports/security/gnutls/work/gnome-libtoo
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 16:20 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:54:04 -0600, Mark Nowiasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > when trying to upgrade security/gnutls the build process just hangs:
> >
> > -8<--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6147: if-less endif
Not sure why I am seeing this, but I seem to get it consistently,
even after I delete the file and request a new one via cvsup.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Da
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:28:59PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6147: if-less endif
>
> Not sure why I am seeing this, but I seem to get it consistently,
> even after I delete the file and request a new
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:47:29PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:02:13AM -0700, James wrote:
>>> Sounds like an entirely reasonable course of action. The maintainers'
>>> email addresses ought to be in the Makefile for each
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:28:59PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 6147: if-less endif
Not sure why I am seeing t
Script started on Sat Mar 1 18:10:02 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp]# exitmore bsd.port.mk ls[Kcd
/usr/ports/Mkvsup -g -L2 -hcvsup4.freebsd.org
/root/ports-supfile && p
portupgrade -aDD
Parsing supfile "/root/ports-supfile"
Connecting to cvsup4.freebsd.org
On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
Since the last commit to it was in October last year, I doubt that
it is something generic. Could you please log us the full commands
you are going etc?
$ script foo
Logging to foo
$
$ exit
Logging closed
$ cat foo | mail -s "output"
Ah, i
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:02:26PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>
> >Since the last commit to it was in October last year, I doubt that
> >it is something generic. Could you please log us the full commands
> >you are going etc?
> >
> >$ script fo
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:52:54PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:02:26PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >
> > >Since the last commit to it was in October last year, I doubt that
> > >it is something generic. Could
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:02:26PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
>
> >Since the last commit to it was in October last year, I doubt that
> >it is something generic. Could you please log us the full commands
> >you are going etc?
> >
> >$ script fo
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:02:26PM -0800, paul beard wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >
> > >Since the last commit to it was in October last year, I doubt that
> > >it is something gener
20 matches
Mail list logo
